First Episode Schizophrenia and Cannabis-Related Disorder Study

July 9, 2019 updated by: Alan Green, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Clozapine Vs. Risperidone for People With First Episode Schizophrenia and Co-Occurring Substance Use Disorder

Many individuals with schizophrenia abuse cannabis at the onset of their illness, portending a poorer course of illness and poorer treatment response. Preliminary evidence suggests that clozapine may uniquely reduce substance use in patients with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study is to establish an effective methodology for studying early treatment with clozapine in patients with co-occurring schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder, while generating pilot data comparing clozapine vs. risperidone on substance use, psychiatric symptoms, side effects, and treatment discontinuation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Schizophrenia is a relapsing disorder that produces profound effects on those afflicted once it becomes chronic, often leading to a severe and long-term disability. However, during the initial years of illness many patients are more treatment responsive and may achieve substantial periods of remission. Comorbid substance use disorder, a common concomitant of schizophrenia, is associated with increases in morbidity and mortality. Within the early phases of schizophrenia, comorbid cannabis use disorder (CUD), the most common comorbid disorder (approximately 50%), appears to be linked to a poor outcome in these patients, and may be a factor in their long-term deterioration. While data indicate that first episode patients presenting with comorbid CUD have an earlier onset of illness and a poorer outcome than those without CUD, continued cannabis use after antipsychotic treatment, which occurs in approximately 50% of these patients in the initial months after hospitalization, is associated with an even worse outcome. The apparent "toxicity" of cannabis use in first episode patients is paralleled by data from chronic patients, in whom CUD is associated with clinical exacerbations, non-compliance with treatment, poor global functioning, and increased relapse. A growing body of data suggests that a critical period exists in patients with schizophrenia during the early phases of psychosis in which symptoms and functioning continue to worsen, and that treatment with antipsychotic medications during this period may improve the natural course of the disorder. While the availability of novel antipsychotic medications has sparked further research in the early phases of schizophrenia, there have been few studies including clozapine (CLOZ). We hypothesize that CLOZ may be more effective than other novel agents in controlling cannabis use in patients with first episode schizophrenia who are comorbid for CUD. We postulate that standard antipsychotic medications do not decrease substance use in this population largely because they do not restore normal functioning of the dysfunctional dopamine (DA) pathways. CLOZ, by contrast, through its varied actions on dopaminergic, serotonergic and, particularly, noradrenergic neurons, coupled with its weak D2 and potent noradrenergic alpha2 blocking ability, may tend to have a "normalizing" effect on the signal detection capability of these dysfunctional DA systems. CLOZ is rarely used in first episode patients even though it is generally considered a highly effective medication, and more likely to prevent relapses than typical antipsychotics in both treatment refractory and non-refractory populations. While side effects of CLOZ are a clinical concern and need to be taken seriously, experience over the past 2 decades has increased the comfort level for its use. For example, agranulocytosis has actually occurred in 0.37% with implementation of the required white count monitoring system, and granulocyte stimulating therapy has provided an effective treatment for those few patients who do develop agranulocytosis. Gradual dose titration schedules appear to reduce risk for seizure and myocarditis, and experience in first episode patients suggesting that the clinically effective dose of CLOZ is lower than in chronic patients indicates that these risk should be even lower. If our hypothesis is correct, CLOZ, despite its side effect profile, may have a key therapeutic role in these patients, a role with important public health implications. Yet without a clear demonstration of the benefit/risk and benefit/burden profiles of its use, the naturalistic experiment of assessing the overall effectiveness of CLOZ in first episode patients who are comorbid for CUD is unlikely to be undertaken.

This study is enrolling individuals who are in their first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and who are currently using cannabis. Study participants undergo a screening visit including the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) for diagnostic evaluation, and a physical examination, blood tests, and review of medical, psychiatric, and substance use history. Following the screening visit, eligible participants are randomly assigned to single-blind treatment with clozapine or risperidone for 24 weeks. Participants assigned to clozapine initially receive a daily dose of 12.5 mg, which is carefully titrated to the lowest dose necessary to manage psychotic symptoms and well tolerated. Participants assigned to risperidone initially receive 0.5 mg daily and are carefully titrated in the same fashion. Cross titration off of the previous antipsychotic (if any) and onto study medication is completed within 2-4 weeks. Participants on clozapine have weekly blood tests. Concomitant medications are minimized and kept stable throughout the protocol except as needed to manage side effects or urgent clinical symptoms. Study medication, psychiatric visits, assessments and labwork are all provided without charge to participants. Study visits take place once a week. At study visits, medication side effects, physical and psychiatric symptoms, substance use, and treatment services received are assessed. A Lifestyle Intervention is also provided to help prevent metabolic side-effects in this vulnerable population, and assist with recovery. The investigators meet weekly to review clinical care and manage any variations in study protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Concord, New Hampshire, United States, 03301
        • New Hampshire Hospital
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
        • West Central Behavioral Health
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03101
        • Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester
      • Nashua, New Hampshire, United States, 03060
        • Center for Psychiatric Advancement & Community Council of Nashua

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 45 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 17 - 45
  • Meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • Currently within the first episode of schizophrenia ("First Episode" is defined as having onset with the first evidence of psychotic symptoms by history, and the first episode will have ended if the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) has been < 2 and there has been no rating > 2 on any one of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) psychotic items for 6 weeks or longer)
  • Meets DSM-IV criteria for cannabis use disorder
  • Cannabis use within the five weeks prior to recruitment (screening visit or hospital admission) by self-report (TLFB), collateral report, or drug screen.
  • Requires treatment with an antipsychotic medication
  • Patients (or guardians) must provide informed consent prior to entry into the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindications to treatment with clozapine or risperidone, including previous paralytic ileus.
  • Cumulative treatment with antipsychotic medication in excess of 16 weeks prior to hospital admission (or case identification if an outpatient), unless waived by the Medication Adjustment Group (MAG)
  • History of allergic reaction to clozapine or risperidone
  • History of seizure disorder or blood dyscrasia. Note: If patients have a history of seizures, but not a diagnosed seizure disorder, they may be admitted to the study if approved by the MAG.
  • Current treatment with clozapine
  • Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or unwilling to use an acceptable form of birth control.
  • Currently residing in a residential program designed to treat substance use disorders.
  • Treatment at baseline with a psychotropic agent proposed to curtail substance use (e.g. disulfiram, naltrexone, valproic acid, topiramate, acamprosate or benzodiazepines) will require a review by the medication adjustment group before entering the client into the study
  • Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are judged unsuitable to participate in the study (For example, patients who are actively homicidal or have a pending incarceration that would prevent them from participating in the study)
  • History of, or current breast cancer
  • People who are doing well on current therapy
  • Lack of an identifiable primary family/support person, and unable to come to a study site for weekly visits
  • Treatment with serotonin re-uptake inhibitors will not be excluded but requires a review by the MAG prior to randomization.
  • Patients with current cocaine dependence will require review by the MAG to determine stability for the study.
  • Treatment with multiple antipsychotics or long acting injectable antipsychotic at baseline is not excluded, but will be reviewed by the MAG to assess appropriateness for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Clozapine
clozapine: clozapine--tablets, 12.5-100 mg, daily for 24 weeks
clozapine--tabs, 450mg. max, daily, 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • Clozaril
Active Comparator: Risperidone
risperidone: risperidone--tablets, 0.5-5.0mg daily for 24 weeks
risperidone--tabs, 6mg max, daily, 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • Risperdal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Demonstrating Improvement in Substance Use
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Based on the small sample size, it was not possible to test the differences between the two groups for statistical significance. Data on cannabis use were gathered weekly using the Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method. At the end of the study, graphs were plotted showing days of cannabis use per week and rated as "Improved," "Unchanged," or "Worse" by a pair of expert judges. Raters were instructed to rate the graph "Improved" or "Worsened" if it appeared to be >20% better or worse and to rate it "Unchanged" if there was little or no change (less than ~20%).
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Demonstrating Improvement in Psychiatric Symptoms Using the BPRS, CGIS, and SANS at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Based on the small sample size, it was not possible to test the differences between the two groups for statistical significance. Data on psychiatric symptoms were gathered using Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS; weekly), Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGIS; weekly) and Schedule for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS; bi-weekly). At the end of the study, graphs were plotted showing severity of symptoms and rated as "Improved," "Unchanged," or "Worse" by a pair of expert judges. Raters were instructed to rate the graph "Improved" or "Worsened" if it appeared to be >20% better or worse and to rate it "Unchanged" if there was little or no change (less than ~20%).
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alan I. Green, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Study Director: Doug Noordsy, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance-Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on clozapine

3
Subscribe