Wide-Bandwidth Open Canal Hearing Aid For Better Multitalker Speech Understanding

September 30, 2016 updated by: Suzy Levy, Ph.D., EarLens Corporation
Our goal is to design and build a new hearing aid system, which mitigates the most common complaints that hearing aid users have. These include hearing in multi-talker situations, poor sound quality, unwanted whistling resulting from feedback, and a dislike of the sound of their own voice. Current efforts, with limited success, use signal processing methods rather than restoring more closely the normal auditory function. We plan to achieve our goal by reducing to practice three key enabling concepts. The first is to replace the current acoustic transducer with a non-acoustic mechanical output transducer that directly actuates the tympanic membrane (TM). This transducer, called the EarLens, floats on the tympanic membrane in a manner similar to the way a contract lens floats on the eye. The second is to increase the output bandwidth of the hearing aid. The third key concept is to place a wide-bandwidth microphone in the ear canal to capture the pinna diffraction cues similarly to the way the normal ear functions. Our central hypothesis is that a hearing aid that delivers amplified wide-bandwidth mechanical stimuli, directionally dependent cues, in an open canal configuration will perform better than conventional hearing aids when there are competing talkers in the background. First phase includes verification the capability of the system to deliver sufficient maximum equivalent pressure output (MEPO) to treat the degree of hearing loss in the target fitting range.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94063
        • Ear Lens Corporation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing loss less than 60 dB at any frequency, no conductive hearing loss

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Collapsed ear canal, damaged or repaired middle ear, too much sensory hearing loss

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Magnetic Contact Hearing Aid
Subjects were treated with a hearing aid which provided amplification intended to treat mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Acute performance and safety assessed at 4 months compared to unaided baseline pre-treatment, followed by longer-term assessment of safety up to 10 months.
Subjects were treated with a hearing aid which provided amplification intended to treat mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Effective Sound Pressure Level (MEPO)
Time Frame: 1 month
A primary outcome measure of interest is an estimate of the insitu maximum equivalent pressure output (MEPO) of the EarLens system, which represents the sound pressure level that would have to be applied at the eardrum (or tympanic membrane) to produce the same degree of tympanic membrane (TM) vibration that the EarLens system produces with the coil current set to its maximum value, and given the anatomical constraints on the coupling between the coil and magnet for a given subject. The target fitting range included hearing loss up to 60 decibels (dB) Hearing Level (HL). In order for the device to be an effective hearing aid for this target population, the maximum output of the device needs to be able to provide output and gain to treat this maximum hearing loss.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sunil Puria, Ear Lens Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R43DC008499-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R44DC008499 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Please see publication for summary results.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe