Central Venous Catheter Replacement Strategies in Patients With Acute Burn Injury

December 26, 2007 updated by: Shriners Hospitals for Children

A Prospective, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Risks Related to Central Venous Catheter Replacement Strategies in Patients With Acute Burn Injury

This project proposes to answer the following questions:

To determine the incidence of infection with three primary schedules of central venous catheter exchange in pediatric burn patients and to determine the regimen that will minimize infectious risk in children with burns.

The scientific knowledge to be acquired through this project is of likely benefit to the care of children with orthopaedic problems, spinal cord injuries or burns as follows:

The intention is to improve the outcomes in burned children by minimizing one of the most frequent causes of infection in the burn intensive care unit, those from central venous catheters. Decreasing infections will decrease morbidity, decrease length of stay, decrease costs, and decrease mortality in burned children

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim: To determine the incidence of infection with three primary schedules of central venous catheter exchange in pediatric burn patients and to create a system that will minimize infectious risk in this patient population.

Hypothesis: A strategy of routine catheter changes without guidewire exchange will result in no more infections and a decreased risk of mechanical complications over frequent guidewire exchange or frequent new-site replacement.

Background: Reviews of burned children have implied that it is safe to change CVCs on a weekly basis, either by new site insertion or by wire exchange. In non-burn populations the routine use of wire exchange may increase infectious risk. Laboratory investigations have shown that the longer catheters are in place, the more often they are colonized with bacteria; this translates to an increase in catheter infection and patient sepsis. Centers for Disease Control recommendations note that catheters should not be routinely changed. The burn literature has disagreed with this concept, proffering that the change in microbial milieu from the burn wound increases infection risk, and national data indicates that burn units have three to four times higher rates of catheter related bloodstream infections than do other intensive care units. There is a trend in the existent retrospective data that using wires to change central venous catheters increases the risk of infection: CVCs changed to a new site have an infection rate of 16.6 per 1000 catheter days, whereas those changed by means of a wire have a rate of 25.2 per 1000 catheter days.

Methods: Patients will be randomized to three intervention groups: a frequent (6 days) moving of catheters to new sites; an alternating schedule of wire exchanges and new sites (every 6 and 12 days); and a less frequent moving of catheters to new sites (12 days) without wire exchange. This project requires enough patients to show a difference between three intervention groups. A significant decrease in infection rate would be from the current 20 infections per 1000 catheter days to approximately 15 per 1000 catheter days. This would require a minimum of 1000 catheter days per group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Recruiting
        • Shriners Hospital for Children Northern California
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Burn patient with central venous catheter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1
Change every 6 days, rewire every 6 days
Changeing CVCs on a regular basis to decrease infection rate.
Other: 2
New site every 6 days
Changeing CVCs on a regular basis to decrease infection rate.
Other: 3
New site every 12 days
Changeing CVCs on a regular basis to decrease infection rate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CVC related blood stream infections.
Time Frame: patient discharge/CVC removal
patient discharge/CVC removal

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CVC mechanical complications
Time Frame: patient discharge/CVC removal
patient discharge/CVC removal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2007

Last Verified

December 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 200614292-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe