Narrow Band Imaging Colon Polyp Study

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial for the Detection of Colon Polyps and Predicting Histology

In this study the investigators hypothesize that High Definition White Light colonoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) will detect a higher number of adenomas compared to standard definition white light colonoscopy. NBI will have a higher accuracy in predicting polyp histology compared to high definition colonoscopy and standard colonoscopy.

Specific Aim 1 - To compare the prevalence of adenomas detected by standard colonoscopy, high-definition white light colonoscopy and NBI.

Specific Aim 2 - To compare the number of adenoma detected per subject by standard colonoscopy, high-definition white light colonoscopy and NBI.

Specific Aim 3 - To compare the accuracy of predicting polyp histology between standard colonoscopy, high-definition white light colonoscopy and NBI by evaluating the surface mucosal and vascular patterns during the procedure.

Specific Aim 4 - To determine the inter-observer agreement between investigators for the recognition of various polyp patterns

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a multi-center randomized controlled trial that will be conducted at the Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO and The Barnes Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO. Patients referred for screening and surveillance colonoscopy will be enrolled. They will be randomized to one of the following three groups: standard white light colonoscopy, high-definition white light colonoscopy or NBI.

All colonoscopies will be performed at the Kansas City VA Medical Center and The Barnes Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO. Moderate sedation will be administered for the procedure with intravenous midazolam, demerol or fentanyl and Propofol. In patients randomized to the NBI arm, the colonoscope will be inserted to the cecum under white light and will switch to NBI mode at the time of withdrawal. After cecal intubation, the colonic mucosa will be carefully visualized during withdrawal of the scope with one of the three imaging modalities to which the patient has been randomized. No effort will be made to look for polyps during the insertion of the colonoscope. All polyps detected will be documented for their size, morphology (Polypoid: sessile, pedunculated or Non polypoid: superficially elevated, completely flat, depressed), and location. The surface of the polyp will be assessed during the procedure and the histology will be predicted real time by evaluating the surface mucosal and vascular patterns. The patterns would be classified into one of the four patterns described in our pilot study (tubular and gyrus patterns will be combined to tubulogyrus pattern). Any other patterns detected would be described and kept in the miscellaneous category. If a pattern is not identified on a polyp with either white light or NBI, it will be recorded as such and no attempts will be made to predict histology. Photo documentation of the surface patterns of the polyps will be performed. Polyps will then be removed either with a biopsy forcep or snare and sent for histopathological evaluation. Each polyp removed will have one or more corresponding picture of its surface patterns and these will be labeled accordingly. The total time spent in inspecting the colonic mucosa (excluding the time spent in removal of polyps or clearing the colon of liquid and solid debris) will be measured with a stop watch. Representative images of the various polyp patterns will be reviewed, discussed and standardized amongst all the investigators at both sites. In addition, images of all the polyp patterns will be printed and posted in the endoscopy suites at both hospitals.

The bowel preparation will be evaluated and graded as follow:

Excellent (score=1) - >90% mucosa seen, mostly liquid colonic contents, minimal suctioning needed for adequate visualization.

Good (score=2) - >90% of mucosa seen, mostly liquid colonic contents, significant suctioning needed for adequate visualization Fair (score=3) - > 90% mucosa seen, mixture of liquid and semisolid colonic contents, could be suctioned and/or washed Inadequate (score=4) - <90% mucosa seen, mixture of semisolid ands solid colonic contents, which could not be suctioned or washed

Patients with "Inadequate" (score = 4) bowel prep will be excluded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

630

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64128
        • Kansas City VA Medical Center
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Barnes Jewish Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • referral for screening or surveillance colonoscopy
  • the ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • prior surgical resection of any portion of colon
  • prior history of colon cancer
  • history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • use of anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants that precludes removal of polyps during the procedure
  • poor general condition or any other reason to avoid prolonged procedure time
  • history of polyposis syndrome or HNPCC
  • inability to give informed consent.
  • Inadequate bowel preparation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Standard White Light Colonoscopy

Standard White Light Colonoscopy

one exam per patient

High Definition White Light Colonoscopy

one exam per patient

Experimental: 2
High Definition White Light Colonoscopy

Standard White Light Colonoscopy

one exam per patient

High Definition White Light Colonoscopy

one exam per patient

Experimental: 3
Narrow Band Imaging Colonoscopy

Narrow Band Imaging Colonoscopy

one exam per patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The prevalence of adenomas in the three arms of the study.
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of subjects with adenomas in the three arms of the study
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Secondary outcome will be number of adenomas detected per subject in the three arms, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of predicting polyp histology real time by the three imaging modalities.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amit Rastogi, MD, Kansas City VA Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2010

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenomatous Polyp

Clinical Trials on standard of care colonoscopy

Subscribe