Evaluation of EverLift in the Performance of Polypectomy for Polyps 4-9mm

August 12, 2022 updated by: Shai Friedland, Stanford University

Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Use of Submucosal Injection of EverLift in Rates of Complete Resection of Nonpedunculated Polyps 4-9mm

The focus of the study is to evaluate impact of submucosal injection of EverLift in achieving complete resection during polypectomy of polyps 4-9mm during colonoscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The details of the proposed study are as follows:

  1. Experimental group: using EverLift submucosal injection for polyps 4-9mm of the colon
  2. Control group: not using EverLift submucosal injection for polyps 4-9mm of the colon
  3. Methods:

    1. Colonoscopy will be performed in the same standard of care manner as if no study was taking place.
    2. If polyps 4-9mm are identified, the endoscopist is randomized to performing polypectomy with or without submucosal injection of EverLift.
    3. After removal of the polypectomy, two biopsies are performed at the margin of the polypectomy site to identify residual lesion.
    4. The polyp as well as well as the two biopsies are reviewed by a pathologist.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years or older
  • Polyps 4-9mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Polyposis syndromes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: With EverLift
Polypectomy performed for polyps 4-9mm with submucosal injection of EverLift.
Use of EverLift for submucosal injection prior to polypectomy
Experimental: Without EverLift
Polypectomy performed for polyps 4-9mm without submucosal injection of EverLift.
Without use of EverLift for submucosal injection prior to polypectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Polyps With Complete Resection
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The primary outcome measured is comparison of completeness of resection between the with EverLift and without EverLift groups.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Resection
Time Frame: During the procedure
The time between the snare is introduced till the polyp is removed and retrieved will be compared between the with and without EverLift groups.
During the procedure
Number of Polyps Requiring Multiple Snare Attempts to Achieve Complete Endoscopic Polypectomy.
Time Frame: During the procedure (up to 10 minutes)
During the procedure (up to 10 minutes)
Number of Patients With Procedural Complications
Time Frame: 4 weeks (from procedure through 30 day follow-up)
Procedural complications include perforation and immediate post-polypectomy bleeding, early post-polypectomy bleed (within 24 hours) and delayed post polypectomy bleed (between 24 hours and 30 days). Early post-polypectomy bleed and delayed post-polypectomy bleed is evaluated based on emergency room (ER) visit, inpatient stay, transfusion needed, repeat colonoscopy required, surgical intervention required, and mortality.
4 weeks (from procedure through 30 day follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shai Friedland, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyp of Colon

Clinical Trials on Use of EverLift

3
Subscribe