Bisphosphonates and Impaction Grafting in Hip Revision

August 11, 2017 updated by: Region Skane

Bisphosphonates and Impaction Grafting in Hip Revision Evaluated With Radiostereophotogrametri. A Randomized, Double-blind Study in Patients Operated for Aseptic Loosening and Osteolysis.

The primary focus of this study is to investigate whether increased bone density of the graft in revision arthroplasty of the hip can cause a decreased micromotion of the implant relative to the femur.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Morsellized compacted bone allograft can be used for revision arthroplasty of the hip. Treating the graft locally with an antiresorptive substance such as a bisphosphonate has decreased the graft resorption in animal studies and led to a remained bone density in a human series of 16 patients. In the present study we investigate if this increased bone density of the graft also causes a decreased micromotion of the implant relative the femur. 36 patients are planned to participate in a 1:1 randomized and prospective study comparing the bisphosphonate Clodronate to saline. Primary outcome will be micromotion over the first year but also secondary parameters such as late micromotion (between 12 and 24 months), re-loosening subjective outcome and safety.

We hypothesize that rinsing the graft in a bisphosphonate solution prevents its resorption and therefore may reduce the risk of mechanical failure. Patients are followed with radiograms, RSA (radiostereography) preop, postop, at 6 weeks, at 12 and 24 months and subjective months and subjective parameters including Womac and SF 12. The treatment is simple, cheap and appears virtually risk-free.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lund, Sweden, SE-22185
        • Lund University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with aseptic loosening and osteolysis scheduled for hip revision using allograft and impaction technique
  • Obtained informed consent
  • Pregnancy excluded in women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known renal disease or S-creatinine >175 mcmol/L
  • Patients with S-calcium 2.75 mmol/L
  • Patients with diagnosed Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Patients with active primary hyperparathyroidism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 2
10 ml, single dose mixed in bone graft at operation
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
60 mg/ml, 10 ml, single dose mixed in bone graft at operation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease of prosthetic micromotion from 2.7 mm to 1.7 mm as measured by RSA (0-24 months)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease of prosthetic micromotion from 2.7 mm to 1.7 mm as measured by RSA (late micromotion)
Time Frame: 12-24 months
12-24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Magnus Tagil, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University Hospital,Lund, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NKOISR10001
  • EudraCT2006-006439-39

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aseptic Loosening of the Hip Prosthesis

Clinical Trials on Clodronate

3
Subscribe