Evaluating Renal Masses Using Ultrasound Intravenous Microbubble Contrast

December 23, 2015 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Evaluation of Renal Masses Using Ultrasound Intravenous Microbubble Contrast

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in kidney masses by using ultrasound microbubble contrast material, and to see if results from ultrasound contrast studies can predict if a kidney mass is benign or malignant. Patterns of blood flow in the kidney mass will be examined to see if:

  1. benign kidney masses can be distinguished from kidney cancers and
  2. if slow growing, lower risk cancers have different blood flow compared to clear cell cancer which is the most common type of kidney cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any adult patient who is planned or scheduled for surgical excision or biopsy of a solid or complex cystic renal mass would be eligible for the study
  • Histology of the renal mass must be unknown at the time of enrollment
  • Patients who have renal masses that are evident on conventional US imaging
  • Patients will have a correlative abdominal CT and/or MRI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any history of cardiac shunts.
  • Patients with history of pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, including patients on mechanical ventilation.
  • Patients without peripheral IV access
  • Pregnant patients and children
  • Patients with any known contrast allergies, allergy to perflutren, or any components of Definity or microbubble contrast
  • Patients who have renal masses that are not evident on conventional US imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Patients entering into this protocol will also have a preoperative renal contrast enhanced US for this research study. Renal mass US contrast enhancement results will be compared with surgical pathological findings to determine if contrast enhancement patterns of the renal masses correlate with benign and malignant histopathology, and/or malignant histologic subtype.
Intravenous line will be inserted. After the ultrasound microbubble contrast has been suspended into solution, contrast will be injected intrav via hand bolus with a total activated suspension of 0.2 mL (30 uL octaflouropropane),followed by 10 mL saline flush, with option to rebolus 4 addit time's for tot dose of 150 uL. Post contrast cine images of renal mass will be obtained on commercially available US units primarily using low mechanical index settings & Contrast Pulsed Sequence (CPS®) technique. Images will be acquired at predetermined intervals, for up to 8 min post contrast admin. Manufacturer's guidelines incl immediate post flush image capture, as well as post admin image capture at intervals as 1 min, 2 , 4 & 8 mins. Additional, temporary higher mechanical index imaging of kidney for the purpose of "flash" bubble destruction may be optionally triggered using manufacturer's preset settings & energy w/i FDA guidelines. This will only be performed while imaging the kidney.
Other Names:
  • Conventional and contrast enhanced US images will be saved to the hard drive
  • and /or digitally archived, without any unique identifiers, and reviewed at a
  • later date. Images will be reviewed by three radiologists who are blinded to
  • the clinical, pathologic, and non ultrasound imaging findings. Grayscale
  • characteristics, qualitative and quantitative enhancement characteristics will
  • be recorded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses to predict benign vs. malignant histology
Time Frame: conclusion of study
conclusion of study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine if clear cell renal malignancies can be predicted, or differentiated, from other less aggressive malignant subtypes, based on analysis of the data.
Time Frame: conclusion of study
conclusion of study
To determine if contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses provides added value in predicting benign vs. malignant histology, when compared to the current routine evaluation of CT or MRI, and standard grey scale and Doppler US
Time Frame: conclusion of the study
conclusion of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott Gerst, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe