A Comparison of the Effects of Intraoperative Administration of Metoprolol or Esmolol on General Anesthetic Requirement

June 29, 2017 updated by: University of Oklahoma

A Comparison of the Effect of Intraoperative Administration of Metoprolol or Esmolol on General Anesthetic Requirement

We will compare three study groups receiving metoprolol, esmolol, or placebo. Level of anesthesia will be titrated to achieve the same range of BIS value in all groups. Our hypothesis is that the metoprolol and esmolol groups will require a lower level of anesthetic agent to achieve the targeted BIS range, compared to the placebo group.

Our objective is to clarify if metoprolol, in a dose range used for perioperative cardiac protection, decreases anesthetic requirement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Beta-receptor antagonists are commonly used in the perioperative setting. These agents have been shown to decrease the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and are recommended by a recent practice guideline in certain patient groups.1 Besides protection from ischemia, there are other situations where beta-receptor antagonists are used intraoperatively such as control of the sympathetic response to tracheal intubation and certain types of surgical stimuli.

There is new evidence suggesting that administration of esmolol, a short-acting beta-receptor antagonist, might reduce the actual anesthetic requirement. This was initially shown by studies in which esmolol decreased the amount of anesthetic required to prevent movement after skin incision.2;3 Subsequent studies used bispectral index (BIS) as an endpoint and demonstrated decreased BIS values in subjects receiving esmolol during general anesthesia. 4;5

This anesthetic-sparing effect observed with esmolol has not been prospectively studied with other beta-receptor antagonists. Since perioperative beta-blockade is commonly achieved using longer acting agents such as metoprolol or atenolol, it is clinically relevant to understand the effects of these medications on anesthetic requirement. We aim to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study to compare the anesthetic-sparing effect of metoprolol and esmolol administered intraoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Dept. Anesthesiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being older than 18 but, not older than 75
  • Scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia
  • Duration of surgery scheduled as 2 hours or longer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intracranial or intrathoracic surgery (due to difficulty using a BIS monitor or frequent need for beta-receptor antagonism)
  • Indication for perioperative beta-receptor antagonism
  • Current use of calcium-channel antagonists
  • History of coronary artery disease
  • History of reactive airway disease
  • History of diabetes or other disorders of glucose metabolism
  • Reported allergy to any of the study drugs
  • Reported substance abuse (except nicotine and caffeine)
  • Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor drugs
  • Hypersensitivity to metoprolol, esmolol and related derivatives, or to any of the excipients of either.
  • Hypersensitivity to other beta-blockers (cross-sensitivity between beta-blockers can occur).
  • Sick-sinus Syndrome.
  • Heart block greater than first degree, cardiogenic shock, and overt cardiac failure.
  • Significant first-degree heart block (P-R interval greater than or equal to 0.24 sec; systolic pressure < 100mmHg; or moderate- to-severe cardiac failure).
  • Severe peripheral arterial circulatory disorders.
  • Pheochromocytoma.
  • Baseline heart rate of < 60
  • Systolic pressure less than 100 mm Hg
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: M-Group
Patients were randomly assigned to Metoprolol Group. The drug was dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl and 1mg/ml Metoprolol. Investigators and patients were blinded to the group assignment.
60ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl, 5ml syringes of metoprolol at 1mg/ml concentration
Other Names:
  • M-Group
Experimental: E-Group
Patients were randomly assigned to Esmolol Group. The drug was dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl and 10mg/ml Esmolol. Investigators and patients were blinded to the group assignment.
60ml syringes of esmolol at 10 mg/ml concentration, 5ml syringes of 0.9% of NaCl
Other Names:
  • E-Group
Placebo Comparator: P-Group
Patients were randomly assigned to this group. Patients received 0.9% NaCl only. To maintain the blind, 0.9% NaCl was also dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes.
0.9%NaCl dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes
Other Names:
  • Placebo Comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Curve of etSEV Over the First Hour
Time Frame: Every 5 minutes for 2 hours
We will measure the amount of Sevoflurane used to achieve the same level Bispectral Index. Each patient will have their percentage of sevoflurane in expired breath measured every 5 minutes for 2 hours, resulting in 24 data points per person. The primary endpoint will be area under the curve (AUC) for each subject for the first hour.
Every 5 minutes for 2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pramod Chetty, MD, Faculty, Anesthesiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe