Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (NIS) To Investigate The Safety And Effectiveness Of MACUGEN In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice

November 6, 2018 updated by: Pfizer
To define what procedures were used for the diagnosis and monitoring of the treatment age-related macular degeneration (AMD). What is the effect of the Macugen, compliance with Macugen treatment, safety profile of Macugen, final physician assessment of treatment with Macugen.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

no sampling

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Czechia
      • Brno, Czechia, 625 00
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Brno, Czechia, 62500
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 775 20
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 77520
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Ostrava - Poruba, Czechia, 70852
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Plzen, Czechia, 304 60
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 08
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 12808
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Praha 6, Czechia, 169 00
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Praha 6, Czechia, 169 02
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Usti nad Labem, Czechia, 40113
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

outpatients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age over 18 years old
  • patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
  • enrollment to study is fully on physician decision in compliance with current SPC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who did not meet indication according to SPC Macugen.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
AMD
Other: no intervention
Outpatients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
Other Names:
  • observation only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Final Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET])
Visual acuity (VA) measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET])

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Each Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102
VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as logMAR, logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102
Number of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity (VA) as Compared to Previous Examination
Time Frame: Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102
VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss,negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts(85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results based on study eye for which medication was given. Number of participants with VA improved, unchanged or worsened as compared to previous examination reported.
Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102
Physician's Assessment of Efficacy
Time Frame: Week 104 or End of study (EOS)
Efficacy was based on the study eye for which pegaptanib treatment was given. Number of participants with each grade of efficacy of treatment, as assessed by the physician was reported on the 5 point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
Week 104 or End of study (EOS)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Procedures for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Diagnosis and Monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102
Procedures used for diagnosis of AMD and monitoring of the course of treatment included fluorescein angiography (FA), optical coherent tomography (OCT), or other (Ot) procedure apart from FA and OCT. OCT, FA, and other are not mutually exclusive, hence same participant may be included in more than 1 procedure for AMD diagnosis and monitoring at a particular time point.
Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
Duration of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
Duration of treatment (in weeks) was calculated as: (date of the last injection of study medication minus date of the first injection of study medication plus 1) divided by 7.
Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
Mean Number of Doses of Study Medication Received
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
Physician's Assessment of Tolerability
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)
Number of participants with each grade of tolerability of treatment as assessed by physician was evaluated on the five point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A5751032

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe