Two Anesthetic Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

September 17, 2020 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

A Qualitative Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques in Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The goal of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between the investigators' two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI. Quality of care will be measured by time spent in the MRI room as well as parental satisfaction, frequency of interruptions of the MRI scan, incidence-severity of respiratory complications, post anesthesia agitation, and time spent in the induction room, MRI room, and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 7 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects presenting as out-patients, scheduled to receive an anesthetic for MRI of body (spine, chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis) and/or extremity (arm and/or leg).
  2. The subject must be a candidate for both anesthetic techniques. This decision will be made by a staff member of the Department of Anesthesiology. This staff member will not be a member of the study team and will obtain the consent for Anesthesia.
  3. The subjects must be 12 months to 7 years (inclusive of the seventh year).
  4. The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is residing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, or Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
  2. Anxiolytic medication is ordered before the MRI (e.g., midazolam or ketamine).
  3. The subject has a history or a family (parent or sibling) history of malignant hyperthermia.
  4. The subject has life-threatening, medical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 4, 5 or 6).

    • The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scale is a measure of physical status or how healthy the patient is.
    • For our study, we will focus on children which are defined as ASA I, II or III which means a healthy child (ASA I), a child with a systemic disease that is mild and well controlled (ASA II) or a child with systemic disease that is severe and controlled (ASA III).
  5. The subject is allergic to or has a contraindication to any of the drugs used in the study.
  6. The subject has previously been treated under this protocol.
  7. The subject has a tracheostomy or other mechanical airway device.
  8. The subject has received within the past 12 hours an oral or intravenous alpha-adrenergic, beta-adrenergic agonist, or antagonist drugs (e.g., clonidine, propranolol, albuterol).
  9. The subject is not scheduled to receive anesthesia-sedation care for the MRI.
  10. The subject received one of the anesthetic regimens for the same MRI during the past six months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: dexmedetomidine
Determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between our two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI.
dexmedetomidine general anesthesia for MRI
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: propofol
Determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between our two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI.
propofol general anesthesia for MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome variable will be the time spent in the MRI room
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Secondary outcome variables include incidence-severity of respiratory complications
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 7, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe