Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Buttock Lipoatrophy Treatment With Macrolane

September 26, 2022 updated by: Galderma R&D

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Buttock Lipoatrophy Treatment With Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid of Non-animal Origin (Macrolane); a Baseline-controlled Single-centre Study.

The study is being undertaken to establish the effectiveness and safety of Macrolane volume restoration factor 30 (VRF30) when used for treatment of HIV-infected subjects with buttocks lipoatrophy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France
        • HEnri Mondor Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have buttocks lipoatrophy and is unable to remain seated for more than 30 minutes due to pain.
  • Have undergone HIV treatment for more than 2 years.
  • Have RNA copies less than 50/ml.
  • Have CD4 more than 200 cell/mm3.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infections.
  • Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions.
  • Perineal pathology.
  • Condition that may affect pain assessment.
  • Skin with underlying fibrous tissue.
  • BMI less than 19.
  • Insufficient tissue cover in the area to be treated.
  • Concomitant anticoagulant therapy and therapy with inhibitors of platelet aggregation within 14 days prior to treatment, or a history of bleeding disorders.
  • Permanent implant placed in the treatment area.
  • Other injectable implant, liposuction or other surgical therapy in the treatment area.
  • Presence or history of connective tissue diseases.
  • Tumors or pre-malign tissue disorder near or on the area to be treated.
  • Contraindications for MRI
  • Previous hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid, or to the local anesthetic or antibiotic used in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Macrolane VRF 30
Open label, baseline-controlled, one treatment session with injection of Macrolane VRF30 to each buttock, not exceeding 400 ml per subject.
One administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment compared to baseline
Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = "no pain" to the left and 100 = "worst possible pain" to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The VAS pain at 6 months was compared to baseline and the change was calculated.
6 months after treatment compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 18 months after treatment
Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = "no pain" to the left and 100 = "worst possible pain" to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The change in VAS pain was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.
Baseline and up to 18 months after treatment
Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6 months after treatment
A physical health summary score and a mental health summary score was generated on a rating scale of 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better health. The change in health summary scores were assessed at the time points 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.
Baseline and at 6 months after treatment
Number of Participants With Global Esthetic Improvement
Time Frame: One month and up to 18 months after treatment
Number of participants maintaining an improvement compared to baseline using the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) consisting of 5 grades (worse/no change/improved/much improved/very much improved), where the three latter indicates improvement. GEIS was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to pre-treatment photos.
One month and up to 18 months after treatment
Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
MRI was performed at baseline and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months to determine the implant volume, thickness, localization and the possible local displacement of the implant. At the 6, 9 and 12 month visits any displacement was evaluated with MRI by comparison to the 1-month position of the gel. The number of participants with gel displacement are shown below.
12 months after treatment
Adverse Event Recording
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after treatment
Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, investigator findings, spontaneous reports and by direct questioning in the Case Report Form (CRF).
Up to 18 months after treatment
Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay Sitting
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6 months after treatment
Evaluation of when (in minutes) it became impossible for the subject to stay in the sitting position on a standardized chair, at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline. In this analysis "more than 60 minutes" was handled as 60 minutes.
Baseline and at 6 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Head of Medical Affairs, Galderma R&D

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 31GC0804
  • AFFSAPS: 2008-A01252-53

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe