Effectiveness of Dance on Patients With Fibromyalgia

August 19, 2009 updated by: Federal University of São Paulo

The aim of the present study is to assess the effectiveness of belly dance as a treatment for pain and improving the quality of life of patients with fibromyalgia.

Eighty female patients with fibromyalgia between 18 to 65 years were randomly allocated to a dance group (n=40) and control group (n=40). Patients in the dance group underwent 16 weeks of belly dance twice a week, while the patients in the control group remained on a waiting list. Patients were evaluated with regard to pain (Visual Analogue Scale), function (6 minute walk test), quality of life (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and SF-36), depression (Beck Inventory), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and self-image (Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination) questionnaire. Evaluations were carried out at baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023-090
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • classification of fibromyalgia based on the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology
  • female gender
  • aged between 18 and 65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not having altered treatment in previous three years
  • having signed a term of informed consent
  • patients with other rheumatic diseases, painful osteoarticular conditions, uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, diseases of the lower limbs or uncontrolled diabetes were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dance Group
Belly dance
Belly dance classes twice a week for 16 weeks. Each class had a maximum of eight students. The classes were administered by a physiotherapist with eight years of experience in belly dance. Classes began with a warm-up exercise, followed by the predetermined movements for the day, choreography and a cool-down exercise. The participants received a compact disc with music and an exercise book with the history and movements proposed for the program. Beginning in the fourth week, a set sequence of movements in the form of choreography was established for memorization and training at home.
No Intervention: Control Group
Waiting list
The control group did not receive any intervention. They attended all assessments and remained on the waiting lis (after the end of the study was offered to this group the same treatment in the intervention group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale for Pain
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 and 100 where 0 is no pain and 100 in unbearable pain
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Function - 6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
meters traveled on a 20-meter course over a six-minute period
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 10 with 0 indicating no impairment and 10 indicating maximum impairment
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - SF-36 -Functional Capacity
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - SF-36 - Physical Limitation
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - Sf-36 - Pain
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - Sf-36 - General Health State
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - SF-36 - Vitality
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - SF-36 - Social Aspects
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - SF-36 - Emotional Aspects
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Quality of Life - SF-36 - Mental Health
Time Frame: baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life
baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Depression - Beck Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
score between 0 from 63, with higher score indicating greater depression
Baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
Self-image - Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks
scored between 0 from 168, with higher scores indicating greater level of dissatisfaction with self-image
Baseline, after 16 weeks and after 32 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreia S Baptista, PT, Federal University of São Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2009

Last Verified

August 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe