Study Evaluating A Novel Ibuprofen Formulation In The Treatment Of Dental Pain

July 12, 2012 updated by: Pfizer

Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of A Novel Ibuprofen Formulation In The Treatment Of Post-Surgical Dental Pain: Study I

This study will compare the pain relieving effect of a single-dose of a novel ibuprofen formulation to placebo and two formulations of standard ibuprofen in the treatment of post-surgical dental pain following "wisdom" tooth (third molar) removal.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

335

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Normal, healthy males and females 16 to 40 years of age
  • Outpatients who have moderate to severe post-operative pain (confirmed by a Visual Analog Scale-Pain Severity Rating [VAS-PSR] score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS-PSR) following surgical extraction of two or more third molars, at least one of which must be a partial or complete bony mandibular impaction
  • Use of only the following pre-operative medication(s)/anesthetic(s): topical benzocaine, a short acting parenteral (local) anesthetic (mepivacaine or lidocaine) with or without vasoconstrictor and/or nitrous oxide

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Alcohol or substance abuse
  • Any serious medical or psychiatric disorder
  • History of stomach ulcers, stomach bleed, or other bleeding disorders
  • Use of a prescription or over-the-counter drug with which administration of ibuprofen or any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, acetaminophen, or hydrocodone is contraindicated (including: opioids, antipsychotics, antianxiety agents, or other central nervous system depressants[including alcohol])

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment A
Single-dose of novel ibuprofen (equal to 400 mg ibuprofen)
Active Comparator: Treatment B
Single-dose of standard ibuprofen (400mg)
Active Comparator: Treatment C
Single-dose of standard ibuprofen (400mg)
Placebo Comparator: Treatment D
Single-dose of placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference From 0-8 Hours (SPRID 0-8)
Time Frame: 0 to 8 hours
SPRID: time-weighted sum of pain relief rating combined with pain intensity difference (PRID) over 8 hours. SPRID 0-8 score range: -8 (worst) to 56 (best). PRID: sum of Pain intensity differences (PID) and pain relief rating (PRR) at each time point. PRID score range: -1=worst to 7=best. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (pain severity score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderate to 3=severe). PID score range: -1(worst) to 3 (best). PRR: assessed on 5-point pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief).
0 to 8 hours
Time to Onset of Meaningful Relief
Time Frame: 0 to 8 hours
Participants evaluated the time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment they first began to experience meaningful relief. Stopwatch was active up to 8 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered.
0 to 8 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief
Time Frame: 0 to 8 hours
Participants evaluated the time to first perceptible relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible relief' at the moment they first began to experience any relief. Stopwatch was active up to 8 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. The first perceptible relief was considered confirmed if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief.
0 to 8 hours
Pain Relief Rating (PRR)
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
PRR was evaluated at different time points during the study up to 8 hours after taking the study medication, and immediately before rescue medication was taken (if necessary). PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale where 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief.
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Pain Intensity Difference (PID)
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time point (pain severity score range 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) from the baseline score (Baseline pain severity score range 2 [moderate] to 3 [severe]). Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best).
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference (PRID)
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
PRID was sum of PID and PRR at each post-dosing time point. The overall possible score range, for PRID was -1 (worst) to 7 (best). PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time point (pain severity score range 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) from the baseline score (Baseline pain severity score range 2 [moderate] to 3 [severe]). Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). PRR was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief).
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)
Time Frame: 0-2, 0-3, 0-6, 0-8 hours
SPID: time-weighted sum of PID over 2, 3, 6 and 8 hours. SPID scores range was -2 (worst) to 6 (best) for SPID 0-2, -3 (worst) to 9 (best) for SPID 0-3, -6 (worst) to 18 (best) for SPID 0-6, -8 (worst) to 24 (best) for SPID 0-8. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (pain severity score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderate to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1(worst) to 3 (best).
0-2, 0-3, 0-6, 0-8 hours
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating (TOTPAR)
Time Frame: 0-2, 0-3, 0-6, 0-8 hours
TOTPAR: time-weighted sum of PRR scores over 2, 3, 6 and 8 hours. TOTPAR score range was 0 (worst) to 8 (best) for TOTPAR 0-2, 0 (worst) to 12 (best) for TOTPAR 0-3, 0 (worst) to 24 (best) for TOTPAR 0-6, 0 (worst) to 32 (best) for TOTPAR 0-8. PRR was evaluated at different time points during the study up to 8 hours, and immediately after taking rescue medication (if necessary). PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief.
0-2, 0-3, 0-6, 0-8 hours
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID)
Time Frame: 0-2, 0-3, 0-6, 0-8 hours
SPRID: time-weighted sum of PRID over 2, 3, 6 and 8 hours. SPRID score range:-2 (worst) to 14(best) for SPRID 0-2, -3(worst) to 21(best) for SPRID 0-3, -6(worst) to 42(best) for SPRID 0-6, -8(worst) to 56(best) for SPRID 0-8. PRID:sum of PID and PRR at each time point. Total score range for PRID: -1=worst to 7=best. PID:baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at given time(score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderate to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1(worst) to 3(best), PRR: scored on 5-point pain relief rating scale(0=No relief to 4=Complete relief).
0-2, 0-3, 0-6, 0-8 hours
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Relief
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Percentage of participants with meaningful relief evaluated by stopping the stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience meaningful relief. Stopwatch was active up to 8 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered.
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed First Perceptible Relief
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Percentage of participants with first perceptible relief was evaluated by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience any relief. Stopwatch was active up to 8 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. The first perceptible relief was considered confirmed if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief.
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Time to Treatment Failure
Time Frame: 0 to 8 hours
Median time of dropping out of the participants from the study due to lack of efficacy or rescue medication, whichever came first.
0 to 8 hours
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Percentage of participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy or received rescue medication.
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Complete Relief
Time Frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Complete relief was defined as a PRR of 4. PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale where 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief.
0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 hours
Participant Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Time Frame: 8 hours
Participant global evaluation of study medication was performed at the 8-hour time point or immediately before taking the rescue medication. It was scored on a 6-point categorical scale where 0 = Very poor, 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, and 5 = Excellent.
8 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe