Study to Evaluate Efficacy of CO-1.01 as Second Line Therapy for Gemcitabine-Refractory Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

March 5, 2019 updated by: Clovis Oncology, Inc.

A Phase II, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Antitumor Efficacy of CO-1.01 for Infusion as Second-Line Therapy for Gemcitabine- Refractory Patients With Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and No Tumor hENT1 Expression

The purpose of this study is to determine whether CO-1.01 is safe and effective for treating metastatic pancreatic cancer that did not respond to gemcitabine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pancreatic tumors with low hENT1 expression may show less benefit from gemcitabine compared with those with higher expression of this nucleoside transporter. Nonclinical studies indicate that CO-1.01, a gemcitabine derivative, is effective independent of such transporters. Thus patients with low or no meaningful expression of hENT1 who failed to respond to gemcitabine might derive benefit from CO1.01 before needing alternative (combination) chemotherapy. Furthermore, the PK profiles of CO-1.01 and gemcitabine are dissimilar and this may confer additional clinical benefit on CO1.01.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • Arizona Cancer Center at University of Arizona
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • Rocky Mountain Cancer Center
    • Florida
      • Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33425
        • Palm Beach Institute / Collaborative Research Group
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Piedmont Healthcare Research Institute (PHRI)
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Norton Cancer Institute Research Program
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center, Milstein Hospital
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232-1305
        • University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Gemcitabine-refractory metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

    • At least 1 measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
    • Computerized tomography (CT) scan ≤ 28 days prior to CO-1.01
    • First-line treatment included at least 3 doses of gemcitabine (as monotherapy or combination therapy) with the last dose administered at least 2 weeks prior to CO 1.01
    • Radiological best response of disease progression after 1st-line treatment (no radiological stable disease or better allowed at any time)
    • Patients who experienced progressive disease during (neo)-adjuvant gemcitabine-based therapy are also eligible
    • Patients who have completed previous adjuvant therapy without progression, then subsequently have a radiological best response of disease progression on 1st line gemcitabine for metastatic disease are eligible
  2. No hENT1 expression in primary or metastatic tumor sample, confirmed with IHC by a core pathology laboratory prior to study entry also eligible
  3. Performance Status (ECOG) 0 or 1
  4. Age ≥18 years
  5. Palliative radiotherapy (if administered) ≥2 weeks prior to CO-1.01
  6. Adequate hematological and biological function, with no residual gemcitabine-related toxicity
  7. Written consent on an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved IC Form prior to any study-specific evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have had stable disease, partial response or complete response to first line gemcitabine-based therapy
  2. First-line chemotherapy regimen that does not contain gemcitabine
  3. First-line treatment discontinued due to intolerable gemcitabine-induced toxicity
  4. Second or subsequent line therapy for advanced disease. Prior exposure to CO-1.01 or prior randomization in a protocol studying CO-1.01 (e.g.,Protocol CO-101-001)
  5. Tumor that cannot be evaluated for hENT1 expression or that has hENT1 staining in >50% of cells
  6. Symptomatic brain metastases
  7. Concomitant treatment with prohibited medications (e.g., concurrent anticancer therapy including other chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal treatment [except corticosteroids and megestrol acetate], or immunotherapy) ≤14 days prior to CO-1.01
  8. Exploratory laparotomy, palliative (e.g., bypass) surgery, or other procedures are not allowed <14 days prior to CO-1.01 administration; stenting procedures are permissible at any time prior to dosing; in all cases, the patient must be sufficiently recovered and stable
  9. History of allergy to gemcitabine or eggs
  10. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  11. Refusal to use adequate contraception for fertile patients (females and males during the study and for 6 months after the last dose of CO-1.01)
  12. Presence of any serious or unstable concomitant systemic disorder incompatible with the clinical study (e.g., substance abuse, psychiatric disturbance, uncontrolled intercurrent illness including active infection, arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic pulmonary embolism)
  13. Any other reason for which the investigator considers the patient should not participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CO-1.01

1250 mg/m2/day administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in 4-week treatment cycles.

Patients who have SD or better at the Week 8 assessment and who adequately tolerated the first 2 cycles of treatment may continue CO-1.01 at the same or an increased dose (1400 mg/m2) for Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease Control Rate (CR, PR, or SD) using RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks until disease progression
Every 8 weeks until disease progression

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks
Every 8 weeks
CA 19-9 response rate
Time Frame: Every 4 weeks
Every 4 weeks
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks
Every 8 weeks
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: Every week
Every week
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Median progression-free survival
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Median overall survival
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Duration of response
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks
Every 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eileen O'Reilly, M.D., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on CO-1.01

Subscribe