Living With Multimorbidity: CO-ORDINATE Program

January 2, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Living With Multimorbidity: Symptom Management Across the Illness Trajectory

Multimorbidity is common and is the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions in the same individual. People with multimorbidity suffer from a high symptom burden, directly affecting quality of life (QOL). Hospitalization can be a window of opportunity to initiate interventions to promote recovery and resilience and enhance QOL. However, interventions targeting the symptom trajectory and burden of patients with multimorbidity are lacking. Thus, the investigators envisage a nurse-led pre-discharge intervention augmented by telephone support, focusing on care coordination and symptom management. This approach is anticipated to help reduce symptom burden and improve QOL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Describe the symptom trajectory and burden from the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and health professionals and collectively develop a symptom management toolkit; and

Aim 2: Refine and pilot test the nurse-driven symptom management toolkit/intervention to decrease the symptom burden and increase the QOL of critically ill adults with multimorbidity.

Interventional study (Aim 2):

The study aims to test the feasibility of the Care cOORDInatioN and sympTom managEment (COORDINATE) intervention developed from Aim 1 using an experienced-based co-design methodology. A single-arm feasibility study will be implemented with assumptions on the effectiveness of the COORDINATE intervention on outcomes such as symptom burden and quality of life will be evaluated.

Sample and Setting:

Individuals aged 55 years and older, living with two or more chronic health conditions, and willing to provide informed consent will be included in the study. The exclusion criteria include if participants cannot speak English or have a documented cognitive impairment that would prevent participation. Patients will be approached in the Intermediate Care Unit (IMCU) of an academic teaching hospital while the participants are in-patient before discharge.

Intervention Components and Timing:

The intervention consists of four components- i) needs assessment; ii) question prompt list; iii) goals discussion and; iv) symptom assessment and tracking. The intervention will start with the enrolment of a patient living with multimorbidity. The intervention consists of one in-person pre-discharge visit by the study team and four follow-up telephone calls (at 48 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks post-discharge).

Primary Outcomes

  1. Symptom Burden
  2. Quality of Life

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speakers who are planned for discharge from Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) IMCU
  • Who meet the criteria for being admitted to IMCU and planned discharge with multimorbidity as defined by two or more chronic conditions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Who can not provide informed consent or have documented cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
A patient-centered Care cO-ORDInatioN And sympTom managEment (CO-ORDINATE) intervention
The intervention consists of the following four components: i) needs assessment; ii) question prompt list; iii) goals discussion and; iv) symptom assessment and tracking. The intervention will start with the enrolment of a patient living with multimorbidity. The intervention consists of one in-person pre-discharge visit by the study team and four follow-up telephone calls (at 48 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks post-discharge).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Tiredness
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Drowsiness
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Nausea
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Lack of Appetite
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Shortness of Breath
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Symptom Burden Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Score - Well-being
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The ESAS questionnaire is used to rate the intensity of common symptoms including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath; with ratings ranging from 0 (none, best) to 10 (worst).
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Physical Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Role Physical
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Role Emotional
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Vitality
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Mental Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Social Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - Bodily Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF-36) Score - General Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention
Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-reported quality of life that covers 8 domains; score range 0 to 100. Higher score is better quality of life.
Baseline, 6-weeks post intervention, 3 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-care Utilization - Total Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: 3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care utilization data will be retrieved from electronic medical records. The study team is defining healthcare utilization by identifying no. of total healthcare utilization, hospitalizations, emergency visits, and critical care admissions. Higher the numbers higher the healthcare utilization.
3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care Utilization - Emergency Department (ED) Visit s
Time Frame: 3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care utilization data will be retrieved from electronic medical records. The study team is defining healthcare utilization by identifying no. of total healthcare utilization, hospitalizations, emergency visits, and critical care admissions. Higher the numbers higher the healthcare utilization.
3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care Utilization - Hospitalization
Time Frame: 3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care utilization data will be retrieved from electronic medical records. The study team is defining healthcare utilization by identifying no. of total healthcare utilization, hospitalizations, emergency visits, and critical care admissions.. Higher the numbers higher the healthcare utilization.
3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care Utilization - Critical Care Admission
Time Frame: 3 months before and after entering the program
Health-care utilization data will be retrieved from electronic medical records. The study team is defining healthcare utilization by identifying no. of total healthcare utilization, hospitalizations, emergency visits, and critical care admissions. Higher the numbers higher the healthcare utilization.
3 months before and after entering the program

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Binu Koirala, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00244792
  • P30NR018093 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Care cO-ORDInatioN And sympTom managEment (CO-ORDINATE) Intervention

Subscribe