Impact of Nutritional Intervention in Women With Breast Cancer Under Adjuvant Chemotherapy (PASAPAS)

October 29, 2014 updated by: Centre Leon Berard

Randomized Controlled Study Assessing the Feasibility and the Medico-economic Impact of Nutritional Intervention in Women With Breast Cancer Under Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Weight gain in adulthood, overweight or obesity, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption are risk factors commonly associated with risk of breast cancer (mainly for post-menopausal for overweight and obesity). Reduced physical activity is one factor likely to weight gain in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for localized breast cancer. Furthermore, physical activity appropriately could improve many prognostic factors and survival of women after breast cancer. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) could improve fitness, quality of life, body image, treatment compliance and reduce fatigue.

After diagnosis of breast cancer, there is many possible risk factors of mortality or morbidity related to nutritional factors available to management. These risks prevention through management of these patients appears indispensable through an APA program.

Thus, the investigators propose to test the feasibility of implementing a program of dietary intervention and APA to prevent the risk of weight gain (which affects more than half of patients) and maintain and/or increase their level of physical activity during and after adjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With approximately 52,600 new cases diagnosed in France in 2010, breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, according to national projections of the incidence and cancer mortality for 2010.

Weight gain in adulthood, overweight or obesity, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption are risk factors commonly associated with risk of breast cancer (mainly for post-menopausal for overweight and obesity).

Several hypotheses explain the association between obesity and breast cancer: obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes participate to changes in hormone levels (estrogen, leptin, insulin) that promotes mammary carcinogenesis and tumor progression.

The association between obesity and development of breast cancer is partly due to increased serum levels of estradiol produced by adipocytes, but the role of insulin resistance and inflammation associated with obesity is widely discussed.

Reduced physical activity is one factor likely to weight gain in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for localized breast cancer. Furthermore, physical activity appropriately could improve many prognostic factors and survival of women after breast cancer. Thus, several large cohort studies of women with breast cancer showed an average mortality reduction of 45% associated with moderate physical activity compared with inactivity. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) could also improve fitness, quality of life, body image, treatment compliance and reduce fatigue.

A rich fruits and vegetables diet combined with regular physical activity appears to offer the best protection from breast cancer. The nature, frequency, duration, intensity and arrangement of physical training program meetings are key elements to consider, metabolic responses differ according to these factors.

The optimal management for an improved level of physical activity appear to be an individual of at least three sessions per week, 30 to 60 minutes each with a moderate intensity, allowing a physiological response to chronic exercise and an adequate recovery.

After diagnosis of breast cancer, there is thus many possible risk factors of mortality or morbidity related to nutritional factors available to management. These risks prevention through management of these patients appears indispensable through an APA program.

Thus, the investigators propose to test the feasibility of implementing a program of dietary intervention and APA to prevent the risk of weight gain (which affects more than half of patients) and maintain and/or increase their level of physical activity during and after adjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon Cedex 08, France, 69373
        • Centre Leon Berard

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, 18 years ≤ age < 75 years
  • With an invasive, non-metastatic, histologically confirmed, first breast carcinoma
  • Requiring the prescription of a first line of adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Followed in the research center
  • Whose ability to participate in the APA intervention has been certified by a medical certificate issued by physician, the referring physician or the physician investigator
  • Residing within a radius of 60 km around the center investigator or agreeing to bear the travel costs beyond proposed reimbursement
  • Availability and willingness to invest in the PASAPAS study during the program (6 months) and during the post-program follow-up (6 months)
  • Able to understand, read and write French
  • Covered by a medical insurance
  • Written, signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female with metastatic or inflammatory breast cancer,
  • History or concomitant primary cancer (except for carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix and/or skin basal cell carcinoma and or colon carcinoma in situ and/or not a breast cancer in complete response for at least 5 years)
  • Cons-indication to physical activity practice, at discretion of the investigator,
  • In a state of severe malnutrition according to the criteria of the High Authority for Health (HAS) 2010, namely:

    • Among women ≤ 70 years: weight loss ≥ 15% in 6 months or ≥ 10% in 1 month
    • Among women > 70 years: weight loss ≥ 15% in 6 months or ≥ 10% in 1 month, body mass index < 18 kg / m²
  • History of eating disorders,
  • Not possible follow-up for medical, social, familial, geographical or psychological reasons, during the program (6 months) and during the post-program follow-up (6 months),
  • Deprived of their liberty by court or administrative decision,
  • Pregnant or nursing, of childbearing age without effective contraception during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control arm
Dietetic follow-up only
Dietetic follow-up only
Experimental: Intervention arm
Dietetic + adapted physical activity
Dietetic follow up + adapted physical activity
Other Names:
  • APA arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment in a cohort of adult patients with a 1st breast cancer non-metastatic, the feasibility of implementing an APA intervention during 6 months, in addition to a dietary management, concomitant to prescription of a first-line adjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients who participate in at least two mandatory APA sessions by week during all the APA program, except during the 1st week of each course of CT
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of patients compliance to the implementation of the APA program and analyze of the reasons for noncompliance
Time Frame: 6 months
Rate of patients who completed the full program and analysis of non-compliance grounds during the program
6 months
Assessment of acceptability of the intervention and randomization / recruiting capabilities
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of patients contacted by the investigator to participate in the study and rate of patients randomized
6 months
Verification of adequacy between the conduct procedures of program (APA and dietetic) and the constraints of program implementing in real conditions
Time Frame: 12 months
Formalization of a program used in real conditions
12 months
Description of patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Month 12
Calculation of overall satisfaction score of patients on the treatment received, evaluated by a scale of satisfaction
Month 12
Medico-economic impact of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
Settlement expenses costs, incurred costs and costs avoided by the intervention
12 months
Biological study
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Analyses of metabolomic profiles and adipokines expression linked to breast cancer at initial diagnosis (before surgery) and description of metabolism changes during nutritional interventions and therapeutic care
Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Description of dietary
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Collection of patient nutritional intake during 3 days by self-administered questionnaire
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Description of level and pattern physical activity
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, Week 9, Week 24, Month 12
Evaluation of level and pattern physical evaluation (PAQAP and IPAQ questionnaire)
Day 1 CT, Week 9, Week 24, Month 12
Description of anthropometry
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Measurement of weight, height, waist and hip circumference
Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Description of lipid profiles
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Measurement of total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides
Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Assessment of life quality
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Life quality scores calculation (QLQ-C30, BR-23, MOS SF-36)
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Description of anxiety
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
score calculation of anxiety (STAI questionnaire)
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Assessment of patients compliance to the implementation of diet and analyze of the reasons for noncompliance
Time Frame: 6 months
Rate of patients who completed the full program and analysis of non-compliance grounds during the program
6 months
Description of body satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
score calculation of QSCPGS questionnaire
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Description of body composition
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Measurement of body composition by impedancemetry
Day 1 CT, week 9, week 24, month 12
Description of self-perception
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
score calculation of self-perception (QSCPGS questionnaire)
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Description of self esteem
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
score calculation of self-esteem (Rosenzweig scale)
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
Description of depression
Time Frame: Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12
score calculation of depression (BDI questionnaire)
Day 1 CT, week 24, month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PASAPAS
  • 2011-A00064-37 (Other Identifier: AFSSAPS)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Control arm

Subscribe