- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03342183
Reducing Hemodialysis Induced Recurrent Brain Injury to Improve Patients' Lives
October 17, 2022 updated by: Chris McIntyre, Lawson Health Research Institute
Patients who receive dialysis for kidney failure suffer severe cognitive impairment.
Hemodialysis causes circulatory stress and ischemia, which causes severe brain injury.
It has been demonstrated that a procedure known as Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC), which involves wrapping a blood pressure cuff around a patient's leg and inflating has the potential of protecting many organs, such as the heart from the effects of dialysis.
Our study aims to investigate this phenomenon to determine the extent to which it provides protection to a dialysis patient's brain.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hemodialysis patients suffer severe cognitive impairment: Abnormalities of cognitive impairment (predominately sub-cortical defects in executive decision making) are almost universal in hemodialysis (HD) patients and appear early after starting dialysis.
Around 75% of patients exhibit mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a high proportion (˜15%) have dementia.
Mechanisms of injury: It has been demonstrated that HD associated circulatory stress and recurrent regional ischemia drives brain injury.
The extent of injury is determined by the degree of BP instability during HD.
Peritoneal dialysis patients are not subject to the same stress and retain cognitive abilities.
The injury is multifactorial, and amenable to HD based intervention.
Optimizing dialysis to minimize harm requires understanding the wide range of potential of pathophysiological processes contributing to this injury.
Putative components of pathophysiology that might be amenable to intervention include: a) Direct reduction in tissue perfusion is the characteristic consequence of HD driven multi-organ injury.
The investigators have directly visualized this in multiple organ beds during dialysis (heart, gut and kidney), and have inferred it in the brain from the development of ischemic based white matter (WM) injury.
b) Inflammation drives WM injury.Endotoxin (derived from gut bacteria) is profoundly pro- inflammatory and translocates from intestinal lumen into the circulation during HD treatment directly causing WM inflammation.
Daily HD (gentler fluid removal) normalizes endotoxemia and markers of inflammation.
c) Release of the excitotoxic neurotransmitter, glutamate, produces injury in ischemia.
Plasma levels are lower in HD patients with less ongoing brain injury.
Removal of glutamate by dialysis significantly reduces ischemic injury severity and functional consequences.
Previous success in protecting the brain during dialysis: The Investigator recently completed a successful multi- centre RCT of cooled dialysis fluid to abrogate WM progressive injury- strongly supporting the integral role that the HD process plays in brain injury.
Hemodialysis patients have specific patterns of progressive brain injury: Currently the problem of dialysis induced functionally significant brain injury is typically not well recognized or a focus of care.
Leukoaraiosis describes rarefaction of brain WM, typically associated with vascular cognitive impairment.
It is universally present in HD patients (even when correcting for BP).
Severity of reduction in cognitive function is proportional to the amount of WM injury, with a predominant loss of subcortical functions (executive functioning).
The Investigators have previously demonstrated that the signature of the change in fractional anisotropy in dialysis patients was entirely explained by changes in radial diffusivity, rather than axial diffusivity- pathognomonic of a vascular etiology.
Urgent need to develop additional interventions: Although dialysis fluid cooling appears to be effective in helping to protect against WM injury, there are limitations.
The degree of cooling that can be applied is limited in some patients by cold symptom tolerability and effectiveness has only been tested in patients new to HD. Patients with more established injury may require additional therapies.
These need to be suitable for combination with other emerging dialysis based therapies.
Ideally they will be universally applicable, independent of dialysis machine type, low-cost, safe, well tolerated, and simple-requiring few healthcare resources to apply.
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC): Ischemic conditioning occurs when a transient non-lethal episode of ischemia reduces the effect of a subsequent larger insult.
Similar levels of protection can be achieved by applying brief episodes of ischemia (with a BP cuff on a limb) remote from a target organ.
Successful clinical studies using RIPC have been performed to provide protection against ischemia in many organs, including acute stroke, and can prevent leukoaraiosis in animal models.
RIPC provides protection against HD-induced acute myocardial injury: The investigators have recently completed a pilot RCT demonstrating a RIPC intervention reduced HD-induced acute cardiac injury by 50%, after only a single application.
This effect was maintained over a period of 28 days.
RIPC was effective, safe and well tolerated.
The investigators are currently engaged in a larger Canadian based study to refine the optimum RIPC regime to provide protection against HD-induced cardiac injury.
Interim analysis of this study has confirmed similar levels of efficacy in a Canadian population and allowed us to select the maximally effective RIPC regime, for use in the current proposed study.
Clear translational pathway: This project is conceived in an integrated framework of new therapeutic target discovery, intervention development and sequential testing of safety and efficacy.
The investigators will use clinically relevant surrogate imaging endpoints for rapid evaluation and refinement of candidate intervention, prior to large-scale testing with survival-based endpoints.
The Investigators have already developed a prototype phase III equivalent study.
MY-TEMP is an Ontario based cluster randomized study of individualized dialysate cooling (trials registration NCT 02628366), funded in partnership by the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Ontario Ministry of Health and US based large dialysis provider organizations.
All 7000 patients will be randomized in Q3 2016.
Impact: HD patients characteristically suffer from cognitive impairment.
Understanding the mechanisms behind this will allow the development of therapies integrated into dialysis treatment delivery (anti-ischemic, but potentially also directed at issues such as inflammation and dialyzable injury factors), helping patients maintain cognitive vitality, independence and maximize quality of life.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
25
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
- London Health Sciences Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or Female
- Having hemodialysis treatment at least three times per week
- Must be 18 years old or older.
- Ability to speak and understand English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exposure to hemodialysis for less than 90 days prior to recruitment
- Established severe cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) of less than 18 or with a formal diagnosis of dementia)
- Previous clinical stroke
- Taking drugs to blunt response to RIPC (e.g. ciclosporin, ATP-sensitive potassium channel directed drugs)
- Dialysing using lower limb vascular access
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intending pregnancy
- Unable to give consent or understand written information
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Arm
RIPC stimulus will be applied prior to the first intervention visit, using a previously validated (for cardiac protection in HD patients) standard dose (four cycles of cuff inflation to the lower limb of the patient and inflating at 200mmHg for five minutes, with five minutes' deflation).
To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.
|
RIPC stimulus will be applied prior to the first intervention visit, using a previously validated (for cardiac protection in HD patients) standard dose (four cycles of cuff inflation to the lower limb of the patient and inflating at 200mmHg for five minutes, with five minutes' deflation).
|
|
Sham Comparator: Control Arm
Sham procedure in which the blood pressure cuff will be applied to the lower limb and inflated to 40mmHg for five minutes and deflated for five minutes with the cycle repeated a total of four times prior to dialysis.
To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.
|
Sham procedure in which the blood pressure cuff will be applied to the lower limb and inflated to 40mmHg for five minutes and deflated for five minutes with the cycle repeated a total of four times prior to dialysis.
To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neuro-protection against functionally significant new brain injury
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Change from baseline in brain damage as observed by progressive ultrastructural white matter changes on MRI imaging.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brain Perfusion
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Change of brain perfusion from baseline MRI.
|
1 year
|
|
Excitotoxic neurotransmitter release
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Change in Exitotoxic neurotransmitter release from baseline as seen on the combined MRI.
|
1 year
|
|
Microglial Inflammation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Change in microglial Inflammation from baseline as seen on the combined MRI.
|
1 year
|
|
Neurological impact
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on neurocognitive test.
|
1 year
|
|
Depression scoring
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on depression scoring test.We will be utilizing the PHQ-9(Patient Health Questionnaire) which is used for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression.
This test consists of 9 questions regarding symptoms which factor into the scoring severity index.
Each question is given a score from 0-3, which represents responses such as: not at all(0), several days(1), more than half the days (2), and nearly everyday(3).
The scores can be interpreted as follows: 5-9 (minimal symptoms), 10-14 (Minor depression, mild), 15-19 (major depression, moderately severe), and >20 (major depression, severe).
|
1 year
|
|
Daily activities
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on evaluation of activities of daily living survey.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work- blood count
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work-urea
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work-microparticles
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work-Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin T, nTproBNP)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work-CRP (C-Reactive Protein)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work-glucose
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work- lactate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Blood work- electrolytes
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year results will be compared to baseline.
|
1 year
|
|
Echocardiogram
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Correlated to brain perfusion as well as circulatory stress outputs obtained by the CVInsight devices.
|
1 year
|
|
CVInsight
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Help us to understand if the CVInsight® Patient Monitoring & Informatics System can be a predictor of organ perfusion
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher McIntyre, MD, London Health Sciences Centre
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 8, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 3, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
October 12, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 9, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
November 14, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 18, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 17, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 109413
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease
-
3-C Institute for Social DevelopmentUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedChronic Kidney Diseases | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Pediatric Kidney Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage V | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage IV (Severe) | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2 | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage IUnited States
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaRecruitingChronic Kidney Diseases | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisMalaysia
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedChronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1Taiwan
-
Centre Hospitalier le MansLe Mans UniversiteWithdrawnFatigue | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Failure | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4 (Severe)
-
Centre Hospitalier le MansLe Mans UniversiteRecruitingFatigue | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3BFrance
-
American Academy of Family PhysiciansUniversity of Colorado, Denver; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Kidney Disease | Chronic Renal Insufficiency | Chronic Kidney Insufficiency | Chronic Renal Diseases | Kidney Insufficiency, ChronicUnited States
-
Lund UniversityBaxter Healthcare Corporation; Universidad de CórdobaCompletedEnd Stage Kidney Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisArgentina
-
Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc de LyonNot yet recruitingKidney Failure, Chronic | Diet Habit | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3 (Moderate) | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A (Disorder)France
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalActive, not recruitingMetabolic Syndrome | Chronic Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1Taiwan
-
A.C. AbrahamsCompletedEnd Stage Renal Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease | End Stage Kidney Disease | Chronic Kidney FailureNetherlands
Clinical Trials on Intervention Arm
-
Ohio State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedHypothetical Cannabis PurchaseUnited States
-
UConn HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Centre Leon BerardNational Cancer Institute, France; Fondation de France; Cancéropôle Lyon Auvergne... and other collaboratorsCompletedImpact of Nutritional Intervention in Women With Breast Cancer Under Adjuvant Chemotherapy (PASAPAS)Breast Cancer | Adequate Physical ConditionFrance
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.Completed
-
Zhejiang UniversityShandong UniversityNot yet recruitingDementia | Cognitive FunctionChina
-
Heart of England NHS TrustAstraZenecaUnknown
-
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Africa Academy for Public HealthNot yet recruiting
-
Gia MuddNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); National Institutes of Health...CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Risk Reduction BehaviorUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); University... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per AnzianiRecruitingStroke | Aging Problems | Innovative Rehabilitation Treatment Based on RoboticsItaly