Movement Pattern in Patients With Hip Dysplasia

April 4, 2013 updated by: Aarhus University Hospital

Movement Pattern in Patients With Hip Dysplasia Operated With Minimally Invasive Approach in Peri-acetabular Osteotomy (PAO)

The purpose of this study is to examine the movement pattern in patients with hip dysplasia preoperative, six and 12 month after minimally invasive approach for Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Secondary to examine the movement pattern in patients compared to healthy controls and historical data.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Congenital hip dysplasia is a disease characterised by pathological changes in the hip joint. Hip dysplasia is a normal disease with a prevalence of 4.3% in men and 3.6 in woman. Untreated hip dysplasia is a known cause of developing osteoarthritis early in life and symptoms as pain, hip instability together with a changed gait pattern are normal. Symptomatic hip dysplasia is seen in patients between 15 and 55 years and can be unilateral as well as bilateral. Causes of hip dysplasia are described as genetic, mechanic or hormonal.

Today patients with hip dysplasia are offered a hip conserving surgery before the osteoarthritis has developed. In 2003 a minimally invasive approach for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was introduced at Aarhus University Hospital. An advantage of minimally invasive approach compared to the classical Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is minimal impact of the soft tissues in the hip region.

Hip pain and activity limitations highly affect quality of life and physical function. The gait distance is reduced and patients have to compensate to relieve the pressure on the hip joint. Knowledge about the dynamics of the gait and running pattern in patients with dysplasia is important to understand the consequences of the dysplastic hip joint. Furthermore knowledge about gait compensations is relevant for the clinicians in the management and treatment of patients with hip dysplasia.

Today, gait and running compensation is unknown after minimally invasive approach The purpose of this study is, therefore, to examine the movement pattern in patients with hip dysplasia preoperative, six and 12 month after minimally invasive approach for Peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO). Secondary to examine the movement pattern in patients compared to healthy controls and historical data.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with hip dysplasia and waiting for surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with hip dysplasia
  • Patients in the age of 18-60 years
  • Patients, who can speak, understand and read Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons with hip dysplasia secondary to other hip conditions such as Calvé Perthes and epiphysiolysis.
  • Persons who have had alloplastic surgery in the hip, knee or ankle.
  • Persons with diseases that affect the gait pattern.
  • Persons with serious hip, knee, ankle or back pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
hip dysplasia
Patients with hip dysplasia
A peri-acetabular osteotomy is a surgery performed to correct the dysplastic acetabulum and reduce joint contact pressures and early osteoarthritis.
Other Names:
  • PAO (periacetabular osteotomy)
Healthy people
Enrolled from the patients acquaintance circle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip flexion's muscle moment in stance evaluated in gait, run and jump test
Time Frame: Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Examined using 3D Movement Capture System
Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip extension angle evaluated in gait, run and jump test
Time Frame: Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Examined using 3D Movement Capture Systen
Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
On-set of the hip muscles evaluated in gait, run and jump test
Time Frame: Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Examined using skin electromyography (EMG)
Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Function, sports and recreational activities
Time Frame: Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Evaluated with Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)
Preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Quality of life
Time Frame: preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative
Evaluated with Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)
preoperative (baseline), 6 and 12 month postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie S Jacobsen, MSc, Aarhus University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Inger Mechlenburg, MSc, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Kjeld Søballe, Prof. Dr.med, Aarhus University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Henrik Sørensen, PhD, University of Aarhus
  • Study Chair: Dennis Nielsen, MSc, University of Aarhus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe