Radiochemotherapy With and Without Dose Escalation in Patients Presenting Locally Advanced or Inoperable Carcinoma of the Oesophagus (CONCORDE)

January 24, 2020 updated by: Centre Georges Francois Leclerc

Prodige 26: Radiochemotherapy With and Without Dose Escalation in Patients Presenting Locally Advanced or Inoperable Carcinoma of the Oesophagus

Exclusive concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) at a dose of 50 Gy delivered over 5 weeks, according to the RTOG 85-01 protocol, has led to improved 5-year survival in 25% of patients, whereas no patients survived for 5 years using radiotherapy alone for patients with esophageal cancer. Surgery, even when combined with preoperative RCT, also gives disappointing results for locally advanced tumors, which casts serious doubts on the usefulness of preoperative radiotherapy. By varying the fractionation schedule, the length of treatment or the radiotherapy volumes, it has become possible to obtain levels of loco-regional relapse of around 35 to 45%. After reviewing the results for loco-regional relapse according to the dose of radiation and the recommended radiotherapy volumes, we aimed to investigate why increasing the dose of radiation has no impact in esophageal cancers. Although INT-0123 phase III trial showed no benefit of dose escalation in esophageal cancer, some issues remain unclear as most of the patients who died in the experimental arm were treated above 50Gy. Moreover, only the tumor was treated up to 64Gy while involved nodes were not considered for dose escalation in this trial. In the RTOG 85-01phase III trial, an elective nodal irradiation from subclavicular fossa up to the esophagogastric junction was performed with a 2D technique, delivering 30Gy which could be considered as not appropriate.

In this randomized phase II/III trial, we aim to test an exclusive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for patients with non resectable esophageal cancer with a dose escalation up to 66Gy on the primary tumor as well as the involved nodes using a 3D conformal technique combined with a 40 Gy elective nodal irradiation on lymph node stations (as defined by the RTOG) with a risk of microscopic involvement ≥ 20%.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Centre Georges François Leclerc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age> or = 18 and < 75 ans
  2. WHO Status 0, 1 and 2
  3. Enteral or parenteral feeding (> or = 1500 KCal) planned before the start of treatment
  4. Histologically proven carcinoma of the oesophagus
  5. Histological Types: adenocarcinomas and epidermoid carcinomas
  6. T3, N0-N1-N2-N3, M0 (TNM version 7)
  7. T1-T2, N0-N1-N2-N3, M0 with a contra-indication for surgery (TNM version 7)
  8. Absence of trachea-oesophageal fistula
  9. Written informed consent
  10. Woman under appropriate contraception
  11. Patient able to understand and complete, with help if necessary, a quality of life questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evolutive heart failure or myocardial necrosis for less than 6 months
  2. Myocardial infarction of more than 6 months with ischemic sequelae on myocardial scintigraphy.
  3. Patient cannot absorb at least 1500kcal/j before and/or during treatment
  4. Left heart failure.
  5. Stage II to IV arteriopathy in the Leriche and Fontaine classification
  6. Creatinine > or = 1.25x N
  7. PNN < 1,5.109 /l
  8. Platelets < 100. 109 /l
  9. Albumin < 30g/l
  10. TP < 60% without anticoagulant
  11. VEMS < 1l
  12. History of cancer (except baso-cellular cutaneous epithelioma or in situ epithelioma of the cervix) that has relapsed in the 5 years preceding recruitment for the trial
  13. Patient already enrolled in another therapeutic trial with an experimental molecule
  14. Women who are pregnant or likely to be so, or who are breastfeeding
  15. People who are in custody or under guardianship
  16. Impossibility to adhere to the medical follow up for the trial for geographical,social or psychiatric reasons.
  17. Presence of a history of radiotherapy to the chest or upper abdomen for another tumour
  18. Peripheral neuropathy > or = grade 1 (CTC v3.0)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ARM A

Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodes:

  1. Radiotherapy 40 Gy, in 20 fractions / 4 weeks: PTV (1cm in every direction)
  2. Boost 10 Gy in 5 fr: PTV = +1cm.
  3. Chemotherapy FOLFOX 4: 6 treatments in 3 courses concomitant to the radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29)
40 Gy in 20 fractions / 5 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction)
Boost 10 Gy in 5 fr, PTV = +1cm.
Boost 26 Gy in 13 fr, PTV = +1cm.
6 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43) arm B or 3 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29) arm A.
Experimental: ARM B

Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodes:

  1. 40 Gy in 20 fractions / 4 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction)
  2. Boost 26 Gy in 13 fr: PTV = +1cm.
  3. Chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4: 6 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43).
40 Gy in 20 fractions / 5 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction)
Boost 10 Gy in 5 fr, PTV = +1cm.
Boost 26 Gy in 13 fr, PTV = +1cm.
6 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43) arm B or 3 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29) arm A.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate the rate of acute toxicity leading to cessation or temporary interruption of treatment of more than a total of 14 days or of 7 consecutive days during the whole treatment.
Time Frame: end of phase II (january 2014)
end of phase II (january 2014)
Evaluate the rate of completes endoscopic response at 3 months
Time Frame: for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
Survival without locoregional relapse at 2 years (time elapsed between date of randomisation and onset of local relapse and/or lymph node involvement)
Time Frame: after the end of phase III in january 2015 (anticipated)
after the end of phase III in january 2015 (anticipated)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate adherence
Time Frame: every 3 months until the end of phase II (january 2014)
every 3 months until the end of phase II (january 2014)
Evaluate acute toxicity at 3 months
Time Frame: for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
Evaluate death due to toxicity
Time Frame: each month during all the study
each month during all the study
Evaluate quality of life (QLQ-C30 [annex n° 2] + OG25 [annex n° 3])
Time Frame: after the completion of phase II (january 2014)
after the completion of phase II (january 2014)
Compare according to treatment arm :Quality of life (QLQ-C30 [annex n° 2] + OG 25 [annex n° 3])
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Overall survival
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Disease-free survival
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Acute and late toxicity according to the CTCAE version 3.0 scale
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :The number of palliative interventions, the time to the first palliative intervention
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :The rate of dysphagia according to Atkinson's criteria
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Survival without local recurrence in responders
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Progression-free survival in non-responding patients
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Evaluation of the post-operative morbi-mortalities
Time Frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Evaluation of the post-operative morbi-mortalities (in 30 days) of the group of patients which will benefit from of a surgery of the tumoral residue.
after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gilles Créhange, MD, Centre Georges François Leclerc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 7, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node

3
Subscribe