The Effects of Glycemic Optimization Before Gastric Bypass Surgery (GLUCOSURG2)

January 11, 2022 updated by: Carel Le Roux, Imperial College London

Investigation of the Effects of Glycaemic Optimisation Before Gastric Bypass Surgery on the Glycaemic Remission and Microvascular Complication Rates of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Metabolic surgery such as gastric bypass, gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy operations can cause rapid and uncontrolled reductions in blood glucose. There is limited information on whether:

  • metabolic surgery is superior to modern medical care for glycaemic control and type 2 diabetes remission.
  • metabolic surgery is safe for microvascular complications of Type 2 diabetes
  • good glycaemic control pre surgery has any effects on the long term glycaemia and complications of type 2 diabetes.

This study aims to assess:

  1. whether metabolic surgery is better for diabetes control compared to medical treatment.
  2. whether metabolic surgery is safe for eye, nerve and kidney complications.
  3. whether good sugar control before metabolic surgery improves the long term effects of sugar control and microvascular complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective study involving 150 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. One hundred patients will undergo gastric bypass surgery whilst 50 will be treated with best medical care. The surgical patient group will be randomised to either immediate surgery or 3 months of medical glycaemic optimisation followed by surgery (n=50 group).

Intervention Group A: Patients will undergo gastric bypass surgery within 3 months after randomisation without any pre operative optimisation of glycaemic control.

Group B: Patients will undergo gastric bypass 3-6 months after randomisation. During this period the group will receive modern best medical care based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines. Glycaemic optimisation will be achieved with particular attention to the avoidance of hypoglycaemia.

Group C: Obese patients with T2DM (who choose not to have surgery) will be treated with best medical care based on the ADA/EASD guidelines including anti-diabetes/obesity pharmacotherapy, access to a trained dietician and exercise programme.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, W6 8RF
        • Charing Cross Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, W6 8FR
        • Imperial Weight Centre, Charing Cross Hospital,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients with T2DM and BMI above 35kg/m2
  2. HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and/or the presence of at least one microvascular complication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End stage retinopathy, nephropathy or neuropathy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: gastric bypass
Group A: Patients will undergo gastric bypass surgery within 3 months after randomisation without any pre operative optimisation of glycaemic control.
Active Comparator: Gastric bypass 2
Gastric bypass 2 (Group B):Patients will undergo gastric bypass 3-6 months after randomisation. During this period the group will receive modern best medical care based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines. Glycaemic optimisation will be achieved in a gradual manner with particular attention to the avoidance of hypoglycaemia
Optimise glucose control within 3 months before operation
Other Names:
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • glucose optimisation
  • microvascular complications
  • retinopathy
  • neuropathy
  • nephropathy
  • Gastric bypass with

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of Fasting Glucose, Glycosylated Haemoglobin c and Rates of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission.
Time Frame: 1 year

A patient is considered to have achieved remission of T2F according to the American Diabetes Association criteria if they have fasting glucose below 6mmol/L AND HbA1c below 6% AND no medication for diabetes. Thus, a patient needs to achieve all of the three criteria (fasting glucose, HbA1C, and no medication) before being considered to be in remission. If a patient only achieves 2 of the criteria (fasting glucose and no medication) but the HbA1C is above 6% then they are not considered to be in remission.

The outcome measure is calculated as the count of participants achiving the above criteria

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A Composite of Microvascular Complications
Time Frame: 1 year

A composite of microvascular complications. Microvascular events will be defined as new or worsening nephropathy, retinopathy or neuropathy.

The outcome measure is calculated as the count of participants developing any of the microvascular events.

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carel le Roux, MBChB, PhD, Imperial College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on gastric bypass

Subscribe