The Effects of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass on the Remission of Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DIABAR)

November 8, 2017 updated by: Slotervaart Hospital

The Effects of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and the Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass on the Remission of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and the Pathophysiological Mechanisms That Drive the Conversion of Malign to Benign Obesity

It is estimated that there will be 439-552 million people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) globally in 2030. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is present in one quarter of patients at the bariatric outpatient clinic. It is undecided which metabolic surgery grants best results in the remission of T2DM and which procedure does that at the lowest rate of surgical complications, long term difficulties and side effects. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in 80% of all morbidly obese subjects and is a major risk factor for development of insulin resistance and non alcoholic steatohepatis (NASH). It is increasingly recognized that the immune system, possibly driven by innate lymphoid cells (ILC's), and the intestinal microbiome are major players in this obesity related disease and the switch from benign to malign (insulin resistance and T2DM) obesity. However, the exact mechanisms of action behind the surgery-driven switch back from malign to benign obesity are unknown.Primary objective is to evaluate and compare the glycaemic control in T2DM within the first year of LRYGB and LMBG. Secondary aim is to gain insight in the pathophysiological mechanisms that drive the conversion of malign to benign obesity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Metabolic surgery has proven to be a viable long-term solution in the treatment of morbid obesity and its comorbidities. It induces rapid remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is present in one quarter of patients at the bariatric outpatient clinic. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in 80% of all morbidly obese subjects and is a major risk factor for development of insulin resistance and non alcoholic steatohepatis (NASH), with the latter becoming the major indication for liver transplantation in the USA. It is increasingly recognized that the immune system, possibly driven by innate lymphoid cells (ILC's), and the intestinal microbiome are major players in this obesity related disease and the switch from benign to malign (insulin resistance and T2DM) obesity. However, the exact mechanisms of action behind the surgery-driven switch back from malign to benign obesity are unknown. Also, it is undecided which metabolic surgery grants best results in the remission of T2DM and which procedure does that at the lowest rate of surgical complications, long term difficulties and side effects. The Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB), an efficient but complex procedure, is the golden standard in the Netherlands. The Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass (LMGB) is technically less challenging and has been introduced to overcome some of the limitations of LRYGB. It has been hypothesized that the LMGB has a more rapid and durable glycaemic control, possibly due to the altered constitution and the augmented length of the biliary limb. There is reason to believe that the improved glycaemic control might become apparent within the first year of surgery and that it might remain thereafter. However, it is unknown what order of magnitude is to be expected and whether subgroups of T2DM patients will benefit the LMGB more. Also, it is unknown whether and to what extent intestinal microbiota and immunological tone can predict the metabolic response (improvement in insulin sensitivity) and NAFLD/NASH reduction and whether differences are expected between these two surgeries. Increased understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms as well as their relationship to metabolic disturbances are thought to be of crucial importance to discover new diagnostic and therapeutical targets in obesity associated insulin resistance/T2DM and NAFLD/NASH. Primary objective is to evaluate and compare the glycaemic control in T2DM within the first year of LRYGB and LMBG. Secondary aim is to gain insight in the pathophysiological mechanisms that drive the conversion of malign to benign obesity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI ≥35 and ≤50 kg/m2
  • Diagnosis and treatment of T2DM at intake at bariatric ward with use of anti-diabetic medication.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) ≤3
  • All patients are required to lose 6 kilograms of weight prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known genetic basis for insulin resistance or glucose intolerance
  • Type 1 DM
  • Prior Bariatric surgery
  • Patients requiring a concomitant intervention (such as cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair)
  • Auto-immune gastritis
  • Known presence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease
  • Known presence of large hiatal hernia requiring concomitant surgical repair
  • Coagulation disorders (PT time > 14 seconds, aPTT ((dependent on laboratory methods) or known presence of bleeding disorders (anamnestic))
  • Known presence of hemoglobinopathy
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (RR > 150/95 mmHg)
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 150 umol/L)
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding
  • Alcohol or drug dependency
  • Primary lipid disorder
  • Participation in any other (therapeutic) study that may influence primary or secondary outcomes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a 50 cm biliary limb and a 150 cm alimentary limb
Other Names:
  • gastric bypass
Experimental: Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass
laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass
laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass with a gastrojejunostomy at 200 centimeters measured from the ligament of Treitz
Other Names:
  • One anastomosis gastric bypass, omega loop gastric bypass

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glycaemic control
Time Frame: 12 months FU
as measured by the difference in HBa1C
12 months FU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glycaemic control
Time Frame: 6 and 24 months FU
as measured by the difference in HBa1C
6 and 24 months FU
glycaemic control
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months FU
as measured by the difference in HBa1C and anti-diabetic medication
6, 12 and 24 months FU
Insulin sensitivity
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Mixed meal tolerance test for level of insulin sensitivity
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
NAFLD/NASH
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
NAFLD/NASH parameters in liver biopsy measured with the Steatosis, Activity and Fibrosis (SAF) score according to Bedossa et al (2012).For each patient a SAF score summarizing the main histological lesions will be defined. The steatosis score (S) will assess the quantities of larger or median-sized lipid droplets but not foamy microvesicules from 0 to 3 (S0 <5%; S1 5-33%; S2 34-66% and S3>67%). Activity grade (A) from 0-4 is the unweighted addition of hepatocyte ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-2). Stage of fibrosis will be assessed using the score described by NASH-CRN as follows; stage 0 (F0) no fibrosis; stage 1 (F1) 1a or 1b perisinusoidal zone 3 or 1c portal fibrosis; stage 2 (F2) persinusoidal and periportal fibrosis without bridging; stage 3 (F3) bridging fibrosis and stage 4 (F4) cirrhosis. A diagnostic algorithm which will be used during this study can be found in the original paper published by Bedossa et al.
day of surgery, reoperation
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - portal vein
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in portal vein blood
day of surgery, reoperation
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - liver
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in liver
day of surgery, reoperation
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - abdominal adipose tissue
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in abdominal adipose tissue depots
day of surgery, reoperation
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - GALT
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in GALT
day of surgery, reoperation
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - abdominal adipose tissue
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in abdominal adipose tissue depots
day of surgery, reoperation
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - liver
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in liver
day of surgery, reoperation
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - peripheral blood
Time Frame: day of surgery, reoperation
in peripheral blood
day of surgery, reoperation
Expression and differentiation of immunological cells
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months FU
ILC's, macrophages
12 and 24 months FU
Expression and differentiation of inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months FU
IL6, IRX3 and 5
12 and 24 months FU
Small intestinal and fecal microbiota composition
Time Frame: 2, and 6 weeks, 6 months, as well as 12 and 24 months after surgery
feces
2, and 6 weeks, 6 months, as well as 12 and 24 months after surgery
Peripheral blood inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 2, and 6 weeks, 6 months, as well as 12 and 24 months after surgery
ILC's, macrophages, T/B-cells and dendritic cells
2, and 6 weeks, 6 months, as well as 12 and 24 months after surgery
Eating habits
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
G-food craving questionnaire (FCQ-T) 21 item questionaire scale 0 (never) - 6 (always)
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Eating habits
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
10 questions, scale 0-10 for instance 0 not hungry -10 very hungry / satiety / craving salty food / craving sweet food / craving fat food
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Excreted metabolites
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
urine
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Bio electric impedance
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
body composition as assesed by bioelectical impedance analysis (BIA): the measurement of body fat in relation to lean body mass.
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Quality of life
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Quality of life (IWQOL lite) 5 domain questionaire, 31 items: 1 never true - 5 always true
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Cardiac / ventricular hypertrophy
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
baseline, 12, 24 months FU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maurits de Brauw, MD PhD, Head of department of Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

3
Subscribe