Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) With Mixed Features - Flexible Dose (RESOLVE 1)

July 13, 2016 updated by: Sunovion

A Randomized, 6-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose, Parallel-Group Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Mixed Features

Lurasidone HCl is a compound that is a candidate for the treatment of major depressive with mixed features.This clinical study is designed to test how well Lurasidone works to treat major depressive disorder with mixed features.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

211

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saratov, Russian Federation, 410028
        • Municipal Healthcare Institution"City Clinical Hospital #2, n.a. V.I. Razumovsky" of Healthcare Committee of Administration of Municipal Entity "City of Saratov"
      • Saratov, Russian Federation, 410060
        • State Healthcare Institution, Saratov Regional Psychiatric Hospital of St.Sophia,
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190121
        • Saint Nicholas Psychiatric Hospital.
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191119
        • City Psychiatry Hospital 4 (Saint Petersburg Psychiatric Admitting Unit)
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 193167
        • Federal State Institution "Saint-Petersburg Research psychoneurogical Institute named after V.M. Bekhtereva"
      • Stavropol, Russian Federation, 355000
        • Limited Liability Company "Research-And-Educational Centre of Psychotherapy "Podderzhka"
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
        • Institute of Mental Health
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
        • Psychiatric Clinic, Clinical Hospital Center"Dr. Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje"
      • Cacak, Serbia, 32000
        • Health Centre Cacak Department of Psychiatry
      • Gornja Toponica, Serbia, 18201
        • Clinical Center Nis, Psychiatric Clinic
      • Kragujevac, Serbia, 34000
        • Clinical Center Kragujevac, Psychiatric Clinic
      • Nis, Serbia, 18000
        • Clinic for Mental Health, Clinical Center Nis
      • Vojvodina, Serbia, 23330
        • Special Hospital for Psychiatric Diseases "SVeti Vracevi"
      • Vrsac, Serbia, 26300
        • Special Hospital for Psychiatric Diseases "Dr Slavoljub Bakalovic"
      • Zrenjanin, Serbia, 23000
        • General Hospital "Djordje Joanovic" Psychiatric Dept.
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49005
        • Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital named Mechnikov
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61068
        • State Institution "Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology NAMS of Ukraine", Dep. of Clinical, Social and Child Psychiatry
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 08631
        • Communal Institution of Kyiv Regional Council "Regional Psychiatric and Narcological Medical Association "Psychiatric Dept. #10 and Psychiatric Dept. #2
      • Lugansk, Ukraine, 91045
        • "Lugansk State Medical University"Chair of Psychiatry, Narcology and Medical Psychology; Lugansk Regional Clinical Psychoneurological Hospital, Dispensary Dept. for adults
      • Lviv, Ukraine, 79021
        • Municipal Institution "Lviv Regional State Clinical Psychiatric Hospital, Department #20
      • Odesa, Ukraine, 65014
        • Odesa Regional Psychoneurological Dispensary, Outpatient Dept.
      • Vinnytsya, Ukraine, 21018
        • Vinnytsya National Medical University n.a. M.I. Pyrogov, Dept. of Psychiatry and Narcology, Vinnytsya Regional Psychoneurological Hospital n.a. O.I. Yushchenko, Dept. no. 14, Dept. no 15
      • Cannock, United Kingdom, WS11 0BN
        • MAC Clinical Research Limited
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M32 0UT
        • MAC Clinical Research Limited
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35226
        • Birmingham Psychiatry Pharmaceutical Studies, Inc.
    • California
      • Escondido, California, United States, 92025
        • Synergy Clinical Research Center
      • Garden Grove, California, United States, 92845
        • Collaborative Neuroscience Network Inc.
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford -VA Palo Alto Health Care System
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92506
        • Clinical Innovations Inc.
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34201
        • Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital - Center for Anxiety and Traumatic Stress Disorders
    • Missouri
      • St. Charles, Missouri, United States, 63301
        • St. Charles Psychiatric Associates/Midwest Research Group
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11235
        • Social Psychiatric Research Inst. (SPRI) Clinical Trials
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • Village Clinical Research Inc.
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Finger Lakes Clinical Research
      • Staten Island, New York, United States, 10305
        • Behavioral Medical Research Of Staten Island
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45417
        • Midwest Clinical Research Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19139
        • CRI Worldwide - Kirkbride
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • FutureSearch Trials of Dallas, LP
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-8849
        • Dept. of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center
      • Wichita Falls, Texas, United States, 76309
        • Grayline Clinical Drug Trials

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject provides written informed consent and is willing and able to comply with the protocol in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Subject is 18 to 75 years of age, inclusive.
  • Subject has MDD (diagnosed by DSM-IV-TR, and confirmed by the Structured - Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders - Clinical Trial version [SCID-CT]).
  • Subject is currently experiencing a major depressive episode (diagnosed by DSM IV TR; at least 2 weeks in duration) AND two or three of the following manic symptoms occurring on most days over at least the last 2 weeks (confirmed by the SCID-CT modified for Study D1050304):

    • Elevated, expansive mood
    • Inflated self-esteem or grandiosity
    • More talkative than usual or pressure to keep talking
    • Flight of ideas or subjective experience that thoughts are racing
    • Increase in energy or goal-directed activity (either socially, at work or school, or sexually)
    • Increased or excessive involvement in activities that have a high potential for painful consequences (e.g., engaging in unrestrained buying sprees, sexual indiscretions, or foolish business investments)
    • Decreased need for sleep (feeling rested despite sleeping less than usual; to be contrasted from insomnia)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has Axis I or Axis II diagnosis other than MDD that has been the primary focus of treatment within the 3 months prior to screening.
  • Subject answers "yes" to "Suicidal Ideation" Item 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS (at time of evaluation) at screening or baseline visit.
  • Subject has attempted suicide within the past 3 months.
  • Subject has a lifetime history of any bipolar I manic or mixed manic episode.
  • Subject has any abnormal laboratory parameter at screening that indicates a clinically significant medical condition as determined by the Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo
Experimental: Lurasidone
Lurasidone 20, 40 or 60 mg
20, 40, 60 mg, flexible dose, once daily PM 6 weeks
Other Names:
  • Latuda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline to the 6-week Study Endpoint in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Scores
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0="Normal" to 6="Most Severe". The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity.
Baseline to Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline to the 6-week Study Endpoint in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
The CGI-S score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of illness severity and ranges from 1= 'Normal, not at all ill' to 7= 'Among the most extremely ill patients'. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Baseline to Week 6
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the severity of mania. Seven items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, and four items are rated on a 9-point scale, ranging from 0 to 8. The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 individual items and ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of mania.
Baseline to Week 6
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
The SDS is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors (work/school, social life/leisure, and family life/home responsibility) in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. These three items are responded to on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging through 0 (no impairment), 1-3 (mild), 4-6 (moderate), 7-9 (marked) and 10 (extreme) disability. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the three items and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).
Baseline to Week 6
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety(HAM-A) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
The HAM-A is used to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology and consists of 14 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe/disabling). The HAM-A total score is calculated as the sum of the 14 individual items and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores are associated with greater degree of anxiety.
Baseline to Week 6
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve a Response, Defined as ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF).
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
Baseline to Week 6
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve a Remission, Defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score of ≤ 12 at Week 6 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
Baseline to Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe