Sensitivity and Specificity of Nasal Provocation Test in Allergic Rhinitis to House Dust Mites

March 12, 2013 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
The diagnosis of allergic rhinitis to dust mites is difficult and based on three elements : suggestive symptoms of clinical sensitization to dust mites (rhinitis), the existence of an IgE sensitization defined by skin tests and / or specific IgE positive to mite and finally the presence of mite allergens in the environment where the patient is symptomatic. Unfortunately, the link between symptoms and exposure to dust mites is rarely found and according to in the literature, 30% of rhinitis sensitized to house dust mites did not react during a conventional nasal provocation test (TPNC) to dust mites. Thus, TPNC to dust mite has an interest in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis to dust mites when there remains a doubt due to the poly sensitization of the patient, or the lack of specific symptoms and / or the variability of the allergic symptoms during the year. However, this test has not been completely validated with a study including a significant number of patients. That's why the investigators plan a prospective single-center comparative open study with the main objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of conventional nasal provocation test (TPNC) in 120 patients of 18 to 65 years old with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites and patients with allergic rhinitis not sensitized to dust mites. The investigators secondary objective is to compare the TPNC a faster TPN-called "minute" (60 minutes) and which allow a wider use. If the investigators demonstrate the validity of TPN then it would become the gold standard needed to decide on a desensitisation to mites.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Pole de pathologie thoracique.Unité d'allergologie, d'asthmologie et de pathologie respiratoire de l'environnement

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

From the allergy clinic patients who have a rhinitis and positive skin test to mite or to other aeroallergens or negative skin test

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-smoking or smoking less than five cigarettes per day
  • Subject affiliated with a social security system
  • Informed consent signed and dated by the investigator and the subject
  • Having been informed about the results of prior medical

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe persistent asthma (FEV <70%)

  • Treatment:

    * H1 antihistamine (stop for less than 7 days) * Non-steroidal analgesics (stop for less than a week)* Central anti-hypertensive for 4 weeks- Corticosteroids: Nasal (stop for less than 7 days)Oral (if supported by more than 10 mg per day, stopping for less than a week)Intramuscular *Imipramine and other tricyclic treatment (stop for less than a week) *Ketotifen (stop for less than two weeks) *Leukotriene antagonists (stop for less than a week) * Nasal vasoconstrictors (one week)*

  • Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, systemic hypertension, myocardial infarction (<3 months), recent stroke (<3 months), known arterial aneurysm, epilepsy treatment, drug allergy
  • Inability to measure a change in flow resistance and intra nasal (nasal obstruction complete)
  • History of anaphylaxis to the allergen tested
  • Nasal surgery 6-8 weeks before the study
  • Subject exclusion period (determined by a previous study or in progress)
  • Unable to give informed about the information (subject in an emergency situation, difficulties in understanding the subject)
  • Inability to understand the maneuvers of nasal provocation test
  • Subject in safeguarding justice, under guardianship
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
A = Patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites
Other: Nasal provocation test
TPNC to dust mite has an interest in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis to dust mites when there remains a doubt due to the poly sensitization of the patient, or the lack of specific symptoms and / or the variability of the allergic symptoms during the year. However, this test has not completely validated with a study including a significant number of patients. That's why we plan a prospective single-center comparative open study with the main objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of conventional nasal provocation test (TPNC) in 120 patients of 18 to 65 years old with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites and patients with allergic rhinitis not sensitized to dust mites. Our secondary objective is to compare the TPNC a faster TPN-called "minute" (60 minutes) and which allow a wider use. If we demonstrate the validity of TPN then it would become the gold standard needed to decide on a desensitisation to mites.
Other Names:
  • A patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites
  • B control subjects with allergic rhinitis not sensitized to dust mites
  • C control subjects without allergic rhinitis
Control Subjects
B = control subjects with allergic rhinitis not sensitized to dust mites C = control subjects without allergic rhinitis
Other: Nasal provocation test
TPNC to dust mite has an interest in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis to dust mites when there remains a doubt due to the poly sensitization of the patient, or the lack of specific symptoms and / or the variability of the allergic symptoms during the year. However, this test has not completely validated with a study including a significant number of patients. That's why we plan a prospective single-center comparative open study with the main objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of conventional nasal provocation test (TPNC) in 120 patients of 18 to 65 years old with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites and patients with allergic rhinitis not sensitized to dust mites. Our secondary objective is to compare the TPNC a faster TPN-called "minute" (60 minutes) and which allow a wider use. If we demonstrate the validity of TPN then it would become the gold standard needed to decide on a desensitisation to mites.
Other Names:
  • A patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites
  • B control subjects with allergic rhinitis not sensitized to dust mites
  • C control subjects without allergic rhinitis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Jacques Braun, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
  • Study Director: Frédéric De Blay, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5103

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on Nasal provocation test

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Armenia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe