Major RF Ablations of Hepatomas Under MR Thermometry Monitoring (ARMTICH)

Pilot Study of Real Time MR Temperature Monitoring of Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of Large Hepatocellular Carcinomas (≥ 5 CM)-ARMTICH STUDY

Object of the study:

To assess the effectiveness of MR temperature monitoring of RFA of large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) (≥ 5 cm) in terms of complete tumor necrosis rate achieved and in term of reduction of the number of procedure required to obtain complete ablation of the tumors.

Experimental plan :

This pilot study consist to perform in a single center a single procedure of the multipolar RF ablation under MR temperature monitoring for the treatment of up to three HCC with diameter ranging from 5 cm and 10 cm in 20 inoperable patients. The main judgement criterion of the study will be the rate of complete ablation one month after one RFA procedure performed under MR temperature monitoring. The secondary criteria are, the 2-years local recurrence rate (after the first initial RF ablation procedure performed under MR temperature imaging ± additional RF ablation procedures under ultrasound monitoring in case of remnant viable foci of tumor), the potential reduction of the number of RF procedures required to achieve complete necrosis and the complication rate of RF ablation procedure performed under MR temperature monitoring.

In exploratory attempt, the study will include comparative assessment of these criteria with a historic leg of patients previously treated by the same operator in the same center for similar large tumor by multipolar RFA but using exclusively ultrasound monitoring.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

The RF procedure and results assessment:

  1. In preparing MR room, the patient will be positioned on MR bed put on dedicated MR compatible trolley. The abdominal antenna will be installed.
  2. General anesthesia with tracheal intubation will be performed.
  3. Up to six RF electrodes (up to 6 depending on the size and the location of the tumor) will be inserted under ultrasound guidance.
  4. The patient will be translated without any direct manipulation in the magnet.
  5. With usual T1 and T2 weighted MR morphologic sequences the poisoning of electrode will be checked and if necessary adjusted
  6. Adjustment or MR temperature imaging (before RF energy deposition)
  7. Starting of RF procedure under MR temperature monitoring
  8. According to thermal dose maps data repositioning of electrodes and complementary energy deposition if necessary
  9. Hot withdrawal of electrodes
  10. Immediate (T0) post procedure MR assessment of the limits of ablation zone (T2 SPIRCHOL, Diffusion B600, In out phase, THRIVE dynamic after intravenous gadolinium injection).

After the procedure patients will be monitored at least 48 h.

MR assessment of treatment response will be performed one month after the procedure (same MR protocol performed at T0).

If the ablation is complete follow up will be ensured by MR every three months. If the ablation appeared incomplete or in case of recurrence additional RF ablation will be performed if the patient stills met the criteria of the treatment. The eventual additional RF ablation will be performed under ultrasound monitoring (the response to each additional RF ablation procedure will be assessed by MR one month after).

At the end of the study patients for whom complete radiological response of the tumor(s) initially treated (not local or distance recurrences) will be never achieved, will be considered in treatment failure.

Local recurrence is defined as the reappearance of viable tumor in contact of ablation zone of a tumor considered at least on one MR post therapeutic examination as completely ablated.

All the adverse effect and complication will be recorded and reported.

Quantitative analysis of 2D and 3D parameters of tumors and their related ablation zones as observed at the end of RF procedures on temperature maps using thermal dose concept (as previously extensively investigated) and with usual morphologic MR imaging (all used sequences) before, during and after the procedure (one month after) will be recorded and compared.

Antibioprophylaxy: will be prescribed in patients with an antecedent of endoscopic sphincterotomy (according to the CLIN protocol of Jean Verdier Hospital) and will be extended in patients : 1 older than 75 years , 2 patient with vesicular lithiasis 3) patients with nodule previously treated by embolization and those with a severe diabetes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bondy, France, 93140
        • CHU Jean VERDIER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of 18 year old.
  • Up to 3 tumors unresectable suspected to be HCC according the criteria as previously defined by EASL and recently revised by AASLD among them at least one having a maximal diameter equal or larger than 5 cm.
  • Proof of underlying cirrhosis.
  • Multidisciplinary decision of RF ablation treatment
  • Informed consent of patient
  • Available healthcare insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with short term life training uncontrollable disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Follow up Impossible
  • Contra indication for general anesthesia
  • Contra indication for MR examination with gadolinium injection
  • Tumor located at less than 10 mm from colonic wall or main biliary tract
  • Tumor invisible on MR examination
  • Absence of safe percutaneous course to puncture the tumor
  • Child - Pugh B or C cirrhosis
  • Abundant ascites
  • PROTHROMBIN activity < 50 %
  • Platelet count < 40 .10 3/ml
  • Antecedent of ascitis decompensation
  • Severe portal hypertension defined by the presence of large oesophageal variceal (grade 2) , of radiological ascitis or umbilical vein repermeabilisation
  • Elevation of transaminases (>3 upper limit normal range)
  • Antecedent of biliodigestive anastomosis
  • Antecedent of endoscopic sphincterotomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: procedure
Percutaneous multipolar radiofrequency ablation.
Other Names:
  • Radiofrequency ablation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of complete ablation one month after one RFA procedure
Time Frame: One month after one RFA procedure
One month after one RFA procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
2-years local recurrence rate
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Number of procedure required to achieve complete ablation
Time Frame: One month after completion of treatment course
One month after completion of treatment course
Primary treatment effectiveness (assessed 1 month after completion of treatment course which can include up to 3 RFA procedures performed monthly)
Time Frame: 1 month after completion of treatment
1 month after completion of treatment
Complication rate per RF procedure under MR temperature monitoring
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Agreement of 2D and 3D measurements of ablations zones on IRMT° images and those measured on conventional magnitude MR images.
Time Frame: during and after the procedure (one month after)
during and after the procedure (one month after)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SEROR Olivier, MD-PHD, CHU Jean VERDIER-Radiology department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 20, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 20, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe