Safety and Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined With Laser, Bevacizumab Combined With Laser Versus Laser Alone for the Treatment of Diffuse Non-tractional Diabetic Macular Edema (ALBA)

February 11, 2021 updated by: Hospital Universitario de Canarias

Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Three Parallel Groups to Estimate the Safety and Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined With Laser, Bevacizumab Combined With Laser Versus Laser Alone for the Treatment of Diffuse Non-tractional Diabetic Macular Edema.

This clinical trial is designed to investigate differences in terms of efficacy (mean change in best corrected visual acuity obtained after 12 months of treatment) and safety, of 3 therapeutic estrategies for non-tractional macular edema in diabetic patients: a) laser alone; b) laser plus tiramcinolon; and c) laser plus bevacizumab.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

105

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Dr Negrin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met:

  1. Age ≥18 years from both sexes. Women of childbearing age should use adequate contraception methods and submit a negative pregnancy test.
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2 (documented by ADA or WHO guidelines) and serum HbA1c <11% at the time of randomization (determinations done in the last two months).
  3. Patient able to give informed consent.
  4. Eye with clear media, pupil dilation and patient able to cooperate to perform retinography, OCT and fluorescein angiography.
  5. Patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema; the patient must have at least one:

    5.1) retinal thickening within 500 μ from the center or 5.2) hard exudates within 500 μ from the center if associated with adjacent retinal thickening or 5.3) the size of retinal thickening at least 1 area disc, part of which is less than 1 DD of the center.

  6. Patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema.
  7. Patients with not tractional diabetic macular edema.

A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

  1. Women of childbearing age not using adequate contraceptive methods.
  2. Pregnancy and lactation. Pregnancy test was performed before starting treatment.
  3. Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation.
  4. Allergy to any of the drugs included in the study.
  5. Systemic use of steroids in the last 4 months.
  6. Patient intends to change his place of residence within 3 years after recruitment, whenever you go to an area not covered by the study.
  7. Blood pressure>180/110. If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible.
  8. HbA1c> 11% in the current analysis or done in the last 2 months.
  9. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hare exudates, nonretinal condition).
  10. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.)
  11. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more
  12. History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids or intravitreal antiangiogenic.
  13. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization.
  14. History of focal, grid or panretinal photocoagulation within 4 months prior to randomization.
  15. Need of panretinal photocoagulation in the first 4 months of treatment.
  16. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
  17. Major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, vitrectomy, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  18. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  19. Intraocular pressure >25mmHg.
  20. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion). A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous.
  21. History of cortisone-induced glaucoma that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  22. History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  23. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  24. Aphakia.
  25. Presence of pseudoexfoliation.
  26. Evidence of external ocular infection, including: conjunctivitis, chalazion and blepharitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab (1.25 mg initially, weeks 6 and 12) followed by modified grid laser therapy after3-4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Avastin
Active Comparator: Grid laser
It's a reference standard as the treatment which is currently accepted for NTDDME
Grid laser therapy acts as the standard to refer to as it is the treatment which is currently accepted by EMDDNT.
Experimental: Triamcinolone 4 mg
Triamcinolone 4 mg followed by modified grid laser therapy after 3-4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Triesence

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate the effect on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of intravitreal triamcinolone (Triesence ®) or bevacizumab (Avastin ®) in combination with grid laser therapy compared to grid laser therapy alone after 12 months of treatment, in diabetic patients with not tractional diffuse macular edema (NTDDEM)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the safety of intravitreal Triesence (r)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.
Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
To measure average change in mean central macular thickness in each group.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment was initiated.
To measure average change in mean central macular thickness (in microns) obtained by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each follow-up visits compared to the baseline visit in each of the three groups.
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment was initiated.
To assess the safety of intravitreal Avastin (r)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
To assess the safety of intravitreal grid photocoagulation
Time Frame: Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alicia Pareja, MD, Hospital Universitario de Canarias

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Grid laser

Subscribe