The Neurobiology of Expectancy and Pain Perception

September 12, 2017 updated by: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hospital

A Brain Imaging Study of the Analgesic Effect of Lidocaine and the Hyperalgesic Effect of Capsaicin

This study will use using fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to elucidate how contextual learning/expectation relieves or aggravates pain experience in the same cohort of subjects and the same study session.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a) Healthy male and female adults aged 21-50
  • b) No contraindications to fMRI scanning
  • c) Right handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a) Current or past history of major medical, neurological, or psychiatric illness
  • b) Pregnancy or breast feeding, menopause, and irregular menstrual cycles (length of cycle must be within 26 to 32 days)
  • c) Claustrophobia
  • d) History of head trauma
  • e) History of impaired elimination
  • f) Instability of responses to experimental pain (see Study Procedures Section)
  • g) Use of psychotropic drugs, hormone treatments (including hormonal birth control) within 1 year
  • h) Non-fluent speaker of English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
There is only one cohort in this study. All subjects receive the same intervention, the application of heat pain using TSA or CHEPS.
TSA-2001 Thermal Sensory Analyzer (Medoc LTD Advanced Medical Systems) or the Pathway Medoc (CHEPS model, Contact Heat-Evoked Potential Stimulator, Medoc LTD Advanced Medical Systems)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Response to Pain (0-20 Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-3
Subjects received heat pain before and after the application of a neutral cream (told one application of neutral cream was lidocaine, one was capsaicin, and one was neutral) and rated pain intensity on a 0-20 Visual Analogue Scale (0-no pain, 20-intolerable pain). We only measure this outcome measure in session 3. The pain intensity for each cream was averaged amongst all participants for both the pre and post treatment in session 3. Subjects have up to 3 weeks to complete the 3 sessions.
Weeks 1-3
fMRI Signal Changes in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Time Frame: Week 4
We used fMRI to investigate the signal changes associated with administration of identical pain stimuli before (pre) and after the treatment (post) with different creams in session 3. It is important to note that the subjects had multiple weeks to complete the study, but this measure was only taken during one session. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point (post treatment) minus the value at the earlier time point (pre treatment).
Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jian Kong, MD,eq/MS/MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011P000663

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Heat pain applied using TSA or CHEPS

Subscribe