Comparison of Different Bending Mode for Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation

The purpose of this study is to comparing the effects of different double-lumen endotracheal tube's bending type in tracheal intubation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intubation with the double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) remains a great challenge for anesthesiologists. Although new upper airway devices, such as GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope, had been developed for facilitating airway management, the larger size and the complexity of DLT than single-lumen tube (SLT) makes the difficulties for DLT intubation. Therefore, the investigators designed this study to investigate the effects of different bending type of DLT in tracheal intubation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • department of anesthesia, Kaohsiung medical university memorial hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
  2. more than 18 years of age
  3. Receiving thoracic surgery with double-lumen endobronchial tube

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration
  2. history of gastroesophageal reflux
  3. pregnancy
  4. scheduled tracheostomy and postoperative prolonged ventilation in ICU
  5. limited neck extension (< 35°)
  6. a thyromental distance less than 7 cm
  7. a sternomental distance less than 12.5 cm with the head fully extended
  8. mouth can not open

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: the DLT bending to the right
bending the bronchial lumen of DLT 60~90 degrees in the same side with the tracheal lumen
Other Names:
  • different bending mode of DLT
Active Comparator: the DLT bending to the left
bending the bronchial lumen of DLT 60~90 degree opposed to the tracheal lumen
Other Names:
  • different bending mode of DLT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Main outcome measure is the successful rate of the first intubation compared with the two bending modes of DLT
Time Frame: 12 month
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the time needed to insert the DLT during the period of intubation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
mean blood pressure (MAP) before intubation, and after intubation 1, 3,and 5 min
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the incidence of hypoxemia during the period of intubation
Time Frame: 12 months
Hypoxemia is defined as the SPO2 is below 90%.
12 months
the heart rate (HR) before intubation, and after intubation 1, 3,and 5 min
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the incidence of sore throat after extubation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the incidence of hoarseness after extubation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hung-Te Hsu, VS, Department of anesthesia, Kaoshiung medical university hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KMUH-IRB-20110172

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia Intubation Complications

Clinical Trials on the DLT bending to the right

Subscribe