Effectiveness of Patient-centered Community Health Worker Support to Help Patients Control Chronic Disease

May 2, 2017 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

Community Health Worker Support to Help Patients Control Chronic Disease

The purpose of this proposal is to compare the effectiveness of community health worker (CHW) support vs. usual primary care for helping chronically-ill, low-SES patients to improve control of chronic conditions. Upon enrollment each patient will select one of their multiple chronic conditions as a focus for the trial and work with his/her PCP to set a chronic disease management goal. Patients are then randomized to receive usual primary care vs. CHW support for moving towards that goal.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of target practices for at least 1 yr defined as having one office visit within preceding 12 month
  • Home ZIP code including ANY of the following: 1. 19104 2. 19131 3. 19139 4. 19143 5. 19146
  • 2 or more of the following conditions: 1. Obesity (BMI greater than 30), 2. HTN (ICD9 relating to HTN in EMR), 3. DM (ICD9 relating to DM in EMR), 4. Asthma/COPD and tobacco dependence (ICD9 for asthma or COPD in EMR AND documentation of tobacco use)
  • Uninsured, insured by Medicaid or dually eligible for Medicaid/Managed Medicare
  • Patients who have scheduled appointments in the future.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Will not provide informed consent for this study.
  • Does not have the capacity to provide informed consent for this study.
  • Previously enrolled in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CHW Goal Support
IMPaCT CHWs will perform the following functions, depending on the needs of the participants: 1) Deconstructing Distal Goals into Proximal Goals: IMPaCT CHWs will help patients to deconstruct collaborative distal clinical goals into patient driven proximal goals and develop strategies for achieving each proximal goal.2) Creating Roadmaps: Roadmaps are individualized strategies for achieving each proximal goal identified by patients. 3) IMPaCT CHWs conduct weekly follow-up with patients through either telephone or home visit in order to support the achievement of proximal goals. As part of these followup encounters, CHWs ask patients to measure their chronic disease control during their weekly followup calls/visits. 4) Group: CHWs and their Project Manager run a group session for patients in the IMPaCT arm. This group meets weekly and is a forum for patients to discuss common issues around chronic disease management and form a social support network.
IMPaCT CHWs will perform the following functions, depending on the needs of the participants: 1) Deconstructing Distal Goals into Proximal Goals: IMPaCT CHWs will help patients to deconstruct collaborative distal clinical goals into patient driven proximal goals and develop strategies for achieving each proximal goal.2) Creating Roadmaps: Roadmaps are individualized strategies for achieving each proximal goal identified by patients. 3) IMPaCT Partners conduct weekly follow-up with patients through either telephone or home visit in order to support the achievement of proximal goals. As part of these followup encounters, CHWs ask patients to measure their chronic disease control during their weekly followup calls/visits. 4) Group: CHWs and their Project Manager run a group session for patients in the IMPaCT arm. This group meets weekly and is a forum for patients to discuss common issues around chronic disease management and form a social support network.
Other Names:
  • IMPaCT
No Intervention: Usual Primary Care
Patients will be encouraged to make follow-up appointments as needed with their primary care clinic for support towards their health goals. During these appointments, clinicians will help patients determine progress made on existing proximal goals, adjust goals based on self-efficacy, and help patients to create new proximal goals as needed. They will also work with PCPs to adjust medications when appropriate, provide health behavior education and make referrals to community-based services based on patient need.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in standardized score
Time Frame: Six months after enrollment
Six months after enrollment, the IMPaCT arm will have a higher (more negative) mean change in standardized score for chronic disease outcome of interest compared with usual care
Six months after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Goal achievement
Time Frame: Six months after enrollment
Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT group will have higher proportion of patients who achieve their individualized chronic disease management goal compared with usual care
Six months after enrollment
SF-12
Time Frame: Six months after enrollment,
Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT group will greater improvements in their self-rated health (as measured by mean change in MCS and PCS of the SF-12) than patients receiving usual care.
Six months after enrollment,
CAHPS PCMH (Communication, Self-Management Support, Comprehensiveness of Care)
Time Frame: Six months after enrollment
Six months after enrollment, the IMPaCT arm will have higher perceived quality of patient-centered medical care (as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Patient-Centered Medical Home (CAHPS PCMH) survey) than the usual care arm. Specifically, we will measure the CAHPS PCMH domains pertaining to Self-Management Support and Comprehensiveness of Care.
Six months after enrollment
Hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
Patients in the IMpaCT arm with have a lower rate of hospitalizations than the usual care arm at 6 months after enrollment.
6 months after enrollment
Patient Activation
Time Frame: Six months after enrollment
Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT arm will have greater improvements in their activation (as measured by mean change in PAM score) compared with patients in the usual care arm.
Six months after enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalizations at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after enrollment
Patients in the IMpaCT arm with have a lower rate of hospitalizations than the usual care arm at 12 months after enrollment.
12 months after enrollment
Medical Adherence
Time Frame: Six months after enrollment
Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT arm will have higher levels of adherence to medical recommendations than the usual care arm, as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Measures of Patient Adherence.
Six months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shreya Kangovi, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on CHW Goal Support

Subscribe