A Study to Evaluate the Effect of the Combination of Pertuzumab With Carboplatin-Based Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

November 25, 2014 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of Omnitarg in Combination With Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy Versus Carboplatin-based Therapy Alone on Treatment Response in Patients With Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab in combination with carboplatin-based standard chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

149

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1000
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
      • Wilrijk, Belgium, 2610
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N2
    • British Columbia
      • Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1Y 5L3
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1122
      • Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
      • Gyor, Hungary, 9024
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 43100
    • Lombardia
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20133
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066 CX
      • Poznan, Poland, 60-535
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-781
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125284
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 105203
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 143423
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117837
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197758
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634028
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
      • Valencia, Spain, 46009
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
      • London, United Kingdom, W12 OHS
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom, PL6 8DH
      • Sutton, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
      • Yeovil, United Kingdom, BA21 4AT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically confirmed ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer;
  • only 1 previous regimen, which must be platinum-based;
  • platinum-sensitive disease which is defined by a progression-free interval of greater than 6 months after completion of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous radiotherapy;
  • previous treatment with an anti-cancer vaccine or any targeted therapy;
  • major surgery or traumatic injury within 4 weeks of study;
  • history or evidence of central nervous system metastases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Chemotherapy
175 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
1000 mg/m2 IV Day 1 and 8 of each cycle for 6 cycles
Target AUC of 5 following paclitaxel or AUC of 4 following gemcitabine IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
Experimental: Chemotherapy + Pertuzumab
Loading dose of 840 mg IV, followed by 420 mg IV every 3 weeks
175 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
1000 mg/m2 IV Day 1 and 8 of each cycle for 6 cycles
Target AUC of 5 following paclitaxel or AUC of 4 following gemcitabine IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Disease progression was assessed according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors), for participants with measurable disease, or by changes in CA 125 (Cancer Antigen 125) according to GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer Inter Group) for all participants. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored at the time of the last valid tumor assessment or valid CA 125 assessment.
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Progression-Free Survival
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from first administration of study drug (Study Day 1) to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was assessed according to RECIST, for participants with measurable disease, or by changes in CA 125 according to GCIG for all participants. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored at the time of the last valid tumor assessment or valid CA 125 assessment.
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Kaplan-Meier Probability of No Disease or Progression at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
The probability of being event free (no disease progression or death events) at 1 year in participants remaining at risk.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Confirmed Response Based on Combined CA 125 and RECIST Measurements
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Response by tumor measurement occurred if there was documented and confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). For all participants, response was assessed by both the RECIST and by CA 125 levels, according to whether the participant had measurable or non-measurable disease at baseline. Response according to CA 125 levels was defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline. The decrease had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. The confirmatory sample must have been less than or equal to the previous sample (within an assay variability of 10%). For overall response, the response categories were "response", "stable disease" and "progressive disease". Stable disease included 1) stable disease as defined by RECIST for solid tumors and 2) CA 125 levels that had not met the definition of "response" or "progressive disease".
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all Cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
For participants who achieved a response, the duration of response was defined as the interval between initial documentation of response to the first documentation of disease progression or death. Participants who responded and did not progress or die while on study or while being followed were censored at the last valid tumor or CA 125 measurement.
Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all Cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks
Kaplan-Meier Probability of Maintaining a Response to at Least 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression
Disease progression was assessed according to RECIST, for participants with measurable disease, or by changes in CA 125 according to GCIG for all participants. Participants who did not progress while being followed were censored at the time of the last valid tumor assessment or valid CA 125 assessment.
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression
Time to Progressive Disease
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression
The time to progressive disease is the interval of time from date of first dose of study medication to date of first documentation of progressive disease by either RECIST or CA 125 criteria. Participants who never progressed while being followed were censored at the last valid tumor measurement or CA 125 measurement.
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression
Kaplan-Meier Probability of Being Progression Free at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Time To Response
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment
Time to response was the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of response, according to CA 125 criteria for all participants or response according to RECIST criteria for participants with measurable disease. If response was evaluable by both criteria, then the date of response was for the earlier of the two events.
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment
Survival was the interval of time from date of first dose of study medication to date of death at any time. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact when they were known to be alive.
Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment
Kaplan-Meier Probability of Being Alive at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on pertuzumab

Subscribe