- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02031471
TOSCARA Study: A Study of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Naïve to RoActemra/Actemra Treatment
June 23, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
TOSCARA: An Open-label, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Tocilizumab (TCZ) Subcutaneous in TCZ-naïve Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
This open-label, single-arm study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of subcutaneously administered tocilizumab in monotherapy and/or in combination with methotrexate and other non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARDs) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are naïve to tocilizumab.
Participants will receive tocilizumab 162 milligram (mg) subcutaneously weekly for 24 weeks.
Participants who complete the core study achieving at least a moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response at Week 24 may enter the extension phase and receive for a further 28 weeks at the most.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
57
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalst, Belgium, 9300
-
Assebroek, Belgium, 8310
-
Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
-
Bruxelles, Belgium, 1020
-
Bruxelles, Belgium, 1050
-
Bruxelles, Belgium, 1070
-
Genk, Belgium, 3600
-
Gent, Belgium, 9000
-
Gilly (Charleroi), Belgium, 6000
-
Gosselies, Belgium, 6041
-
Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium, 7100
-
Liège, Belgium, 4000
-
Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
-
Sijsele, Belgium, 8340
-
Sint-Niklaas, Belgium, 9100
-
Wilrijk, Belgium, 2610
-
-
-
-
-
Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2763
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Active moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or EULAR/ACR (2010) criteria
- Inadequate response or intolerant to previous therapy with two or more non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), one of which is methotrexate, administered in an optimal way during at least 3 months; eligible participants may also be inadequate responders to a maximum of one biologic DMARD
- Oral corticosteroids (</= 10 milligram per day (mg/day) prednisolone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; up to the recommended dose) are permitted if on stable dose regimen for >/= 4 weeks prior to baseline
- Permitted DMARDs are allowed if at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline
- Receiving treatment on an outpatient basis, not including tocilizumab
- Females of childbearing potential and males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use reliable means of contraception as defined by protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following baseline or during long term extension (LTE) period
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA and/or RA before the age of 16
- Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- Exposure to tocilizumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) at any time prior to baseline
- Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of screening
- Intraarticular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Evidence of serious concomitant disease or disorder
- Known active current or history of recurrent infection
- Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of screening
- Active Tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within the previous 3 years
- Positive for hepatitis B or hepatitis C
- Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Neuropathies or other conditions that might interfere with pain evaluation
- Inadequate hematologic, renal or liver function
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tocilizumab
Adults with rheumatoid arthritis received a fixed dose of tocilizumab during the 24-week open-label core study and those entering the long term extension (LTE) period further received a fixed dose up to a maximum of 28 weeks or until tocilizumab was commercially available and/or reimbursed whichever came first.
A fixed dose of 162 mg tocilizumab was administered subcutaneously once weekly.
|
Fixed dose of 162 mg subcutaneously weekly
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score in the Full Analysis Set (FAS)
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 24
|
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count of 28 joints (TJC28), swollen joint count of 28 joints (SJC28), patient's global assessment of disease activity visual analog scale (PGA VAS) with 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS and acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or C-reactive protein [CRP]) for a total possible score of 0 to 10.
For this study ESR was used to calculate the DAS28 score.
The index is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56*√[TJC28]) + (0.28*√[SJC28]) + (0.70*ln[ESR]) + (0.014*VAS).
Higher scores represent higher disease activity.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From baseline to Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score in the Per Protocol Set (PPS)
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 24
|
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PGA VAS with 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-mm horizontal VAS and acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP) for a total possible score of 0 to 10.
For this study ESR was used to calculate the DAS28 score.
The index is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56*√[TJC28]) + (0.28*√[SJC28]) + (0.70*ln[ESR]) + (0.014*VAS).
Higher scores represent higher disease activity.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From baseline to Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Positive American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Scores
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24, and Week 52
|
The ACR core set of outcome measures and their definition of improvement includes a >= 20% improvement (ACR20) compared to Baseline in both SJC and TJC as well as in three out of five additional parameters: Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS, PGA VAS, patient's assessment of pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR).
VAS range for all assessments was 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-mm horizontal VAS.
Achievement of an ACR50 requires a >= 50% improvement in the same parameters and an ACR70 requires a >= 70% improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24, and Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Responses According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR ) Criteria
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24
|
EULAR response was calculated as the difference between DAS28-ESR scores at baseline and Week 24, and reported as the percentage of participants with good, moderate, or no response.
Good responders = decrease from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of <=3.2; moderate responders = decrease from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of >3.2, or decrease from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with a DAS28 score of <=5.1; non-responders = decrease from baseline <=0.6 or decrease from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with a DAS28 score of >5.1.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)/Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
SDAI is a similar index to DAS28 but has the advantage of not needing a complicated mathematical formula for its determination, but a simple arithmetical addition of TJC28 and SJC28, PGA VAS and Physician Global Assessment of disease activity VAS, and CRP concentration in mg/L.
CDAI does not incorporate an acute response, therefore it can be used to evaluate disease activity in the absence of laboratory testing of CRP and ESR.
VAS range for all assessments was 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-mm horizontal VAS.
SDAI scores ranged from 0 to 86, CDAI from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change in Total Tender/Swollen Joint Counts (TJC/SJC)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
An assessment of 66 joints for swelling and 68 joints for tenderness was made.
Joints were assessed and classified as swollen/not swollen and tender/not tender by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.
Joint prosthesis, arthrodesis or fused joints were not taken into consideration for swelling or tenderness.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Dose Reduction/Discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
|
Up to Week 52
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission, CDAI Low Disease Activity, Moderate Disease Activity and High Disease Activity
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
CDAI is calculated by simple arithmetical addition of TJC28 and SJC28, PGA VAS and Physician Global Assessment of disease activity VAS.
VAS range was 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-mm horizontal VAS.
Total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
Clinical remission = score ≤ 2.8; Low disease activity = score > 2.8 and ≤ 10.0; Moderate disease activity = score > 10.0 and ≤ 22.0; High disease activity = score > 22.0.
|
Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving SDAI Remission, SDAI LDA, Moderate Disease Activity and High Disease Activity
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
SDAI is calculated by simple arithmetical addition of TJC28 and SJC28, PGA VAS and Physician Global Assessment of disease activity VAS, and CRP concentration in mg/L.
VAS range was 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-mm horizontal VAS.
Total SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
Clinical remission = score ≤ 3.3; Low disease activity = score > 3.3 and ≤ 11.0; Moderate disease activity = score > 11.0 and ≤ 26.0; high disease activity = score > 26.0.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR Remission, DAS28-ESR LDA, Moderate Disease Activity and High Disease Activity
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGA VAS with 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS and acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or C-reactive protein [CRP]) for a total possible score of 0 to 10.
For this study ESR was used to calculate the DAS28 score.
The index is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56*√[TJC28]) + (0.28*√[SJC28]) + (0.70*ln[ESR]) + (0.014*VAS).
Higher scores represent higher disease activity.
Clinical remission = score <2.6;
Low disease activity = score ≥2.6 and ≤3.2; Moderate disease activity = score > 3.2 and ≤5.1; High disease activity = score >5.1.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGA VAS with 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity displayed on the 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS and acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or C-reactive protein [CRP]) for a total possible score of 0 to 10.
For this study ESR was used to calculate the DAS28 score.
The index is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56*√[TJC28]) + (0.28*√[SJC28]) + (0.70*ln[ESR]) + (0.014*VAS).
Higher scores represent higher disease activity.
DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement was defined as a DAS28 score reduction of at least 1.2 units from Baseline.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS represents the physician's assessment of the participant's current disease activity on a 100 mm horizontal VAS.
The extreme left end of the line represents 0= "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end 100= "maximum disease activity".
This was completed by the Treating Physician (or designee).
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
PGA VAS represents the participant's overall assessment of their current disease activity on a 100 mm horizontal VAS.
The extreme left end of the line represents 0= "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end 100="maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2 and Week 24
|
Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS represents the participant's assessment of his/her current level of pain on a 100 mm horizontal VAS.
The extreme left end of the line represents 0="no pain" and the extreme right end 100="unbearable pain".
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2 and Week 24
|
|
Acute Phase Reactants: Change From Baseline in CRP
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
A negative change from baseline in CRP level indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Acute Phase Reactants: Change From Baseline in ESR
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
A negative change from baseline in ESR indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The Stanford HAQ-DI is a patient-oriented outcome assessment questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis.
It consists of 20 questions referring to eight component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other common activities.
Each category contains multiple questions, which were answered using a 4-point scale from 0 to 3. The overall index score was an average of the individual item responses and may range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate more difficulty in daily living activities.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The symptom-specific measure FACIT-F was developed to assess chronic illness therapy with special emphasis on fatigue in the past 7 days.
In this study, only the FACIT-F short questionnaire, which is a shorter version of the initial FACIT-F questionnaire, was used.
Each of the questions is categorically answered using the scales 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much.
The figures are reversed during score calculations, so that higher score values indicate more favorable conditions.
The 13 items included in the FACIT-F short can be used to calculate the brief score for FACIT-F scale (score range: 0-52).
A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over 1-month time interval.
Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.
The participant self-rates each of these seven areas of sleep.
Scoring of answers is based on a 0 to 3 scale, whereby 3 reflects the negative extreme on the Likert Scale.
Global scores range from 0 to 21 and a global sum of "5" or greater indicates a "poor" sleeper.
Although there are several questions that request the evaluation of the participant's bed mate or roommate, these are not scored.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Quality of Sleep VAS
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The Patient Quality of Sleep VAS assessment represents the participant's assessment of his/her current quality of sleep on a 100 mm horizontal VAS.
The extreme left end of the line represents 0="no difficulty to sleep" and the extreme right end 100="extreme sleeping difficulties".
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-Short Form (AIMS-SF)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The AIMS-SF is a reduced version of the validated AIMS2 questionnaire.
The Short Form has been developed using a comprehensive expert-based approach and supported by psychometric testing.
The AIMS-SF is a self-administered questionnaire to measure changes in global health, pain, mobility and social function in adult patients with arthritis and reports scores for physical, symptoms, affect, social and work assessments.
Scores range from 0 to 10, higher scores indicating higher impact of arthritis on the assessments.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Fatigue VAS
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The Patient Fatigue VAS assessment represents the participant's assessment of his/her current level of fatigue on a 100 mm horizontal VAS.
The extreme left end of the line represents 0="no fatigue" and the extreme right end 100="extreme fatigue".
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Satisfaction VAS
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
The Patient Satisfaction VAS assessment represents the participant's assessment of his/her current satisfaction with treatment on a 100 mm horizontal VAS.
The extreme left end of the line represents 0="no satisfaction" and the extreme right end 100="extremely satisfied".
A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 2, Week 24 and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
The 23-item RA-WIS is a simple, validated screening tool for work instability, i.e., the consequences of a mismatch between an individual's functional ability and their work tasks.
This self-administered questionnaire covers a broad range of specific work-related issues and enables monitoring the risk of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
The RA-WIS is scored by summing responses from all 23 scale items.
The scale ranges from 0 to 23.
Cut points have been established to differentiate levels of work instability: low < 10, moderate 10-17 and high > 17.
A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM ) Scores
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The abbreviated 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) derived from the TSQM Version 1.4 but without the five items of the side effects domain, is a reliable and valid measure to assess participants' satisfaction with treatment.
The TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain.
Domains included are effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction.
|
Week 24
|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 52 weeks
|
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
|
Up to 52 weeks
|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tocilizumab Antibodies
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
|
Baseline, Week 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Choy E, Caporali R, Xavier R, Fautrel B, Sanmarti R, Bao M, Devenport J, Petho-Schramm A. Effects of concomitant glucocorticoids in TOZURA, a common-framework study programme of subcutaneous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Jun 1;58(6):1056-1064. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key393.
- Choy E, Caporali R, Xavier R, Fautrel B, Sanmarti R, Bao M, Bernasconi C, Petho-Schramm A. Subcutaneous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: findings from the common-framework phase 4 study programme TOZURA conducted in 22 countries. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Mar 1;57(3):499-507. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex443. Erratum In: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jun 1;57(6):1129.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 8, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
January 9, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 1, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 23, 2017
Last Verified
June 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ML28701
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
Yuanyuan ZhangRecruitingRheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease | Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid ArthritisChina
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSociete Francaise de RhumatologieRecruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisFrance
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcEuropean CommissionCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisNetherlands, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia
-
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical CenterCompleted
Clinical Trials on tocilizumab
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingGranulomatous Mastitis | Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruiting
-
University of ChicagoRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisFresenius AGNot yet recruitingCalcium Pyrophosphate Deposition DiseaseFrance
-
Hoffmann-La RocheRecruiting
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital ColoradoRecruitingAdamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma | Recurrent Adamantinomatous CraniopharyngiomaUnited States, Australia, Canada
-
Queen's Medical CenterTerminatedCOVID-19United States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompleted
-
Capital Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
Capital Medical UniversityActive, not recruiting