High Intensity Physiotherapy for Hip Fractures (HIP4hips)

December 29, 2015 updated by: Lara Kimmel, The Alfred

High Intensity Physiotherapy for Hip Fractures in the Acute Hospital Setting

Every day, more than 40 Australian break their hip, Most are over the age of sixty five. Hip fractures are a significant problem for the older people, the hospital system and community as a whole because of the increasing numbers of fractures and the cost of hospitalisation and ongoing care. After one year, less than half of all people with a hip fracture can walk as well as they did before the fracture. Physiotherapy in the acute hospital setting is an integral part of patient care, although the intensity of physiotherapy a patient receives is variable and the optimal number of treatment sessions per day remains unknown. Studies in other patient groups have shown that increased physiotherapy can improve patient outcomes by increasing muscle strength and mobility. It can also reduce the negative effects of bed rest such as muscle wasting, blood clots in the lungs or leg veins and chest infections such as pneumonia. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of an intensive physiotherapy program in hip fracture patients to further understand this and the effect it has on patient function.

In this research the investigators will randomly allocate patients into 2 groups; usual care and intensive physiotherapy. The usual care group will have physiotherapy treatment daily whereas the intensive physiotherapy group will have an additional daily treatment by a physiotherapist as well as a daily treatment by an allied health assistant. The objectives are to achieve better functional outcomes in the patient's hospital stay (ie improved mobility), reduce the time for patients to be physically ready to go home, increase the number of patients able to go directly home or to fast stream rehabilitation (rather than a slow stream option).

If increased intensity of physiotherapy is found to improve patient's mobility outcomes, this research will provide the confidence to endorse a change to current clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3181
        • The Alfred

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to The Alfred with an isolated hip fracture and treated with internal fixation, aged 65 or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fracture is in the sub-trochanteric region of the femur,
  • if it is pathological,
  • if post operative orders are for non-weight bearing on the operated hip,
  • if they were unable to mobilise independently (or with gait aid) prior to admission,
  • or if they were admitted from a nursing home.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual care
usual care physiotherapy - once daily treatment whilst inpatient in acute hospital
once daily physiotherapy whilst acute hospital inpatient
Experimental: Intensive physiotherapy
additional once daily physiotherapy and once daily allied health assistant intervention
additional once daily physiotherapy and once daily allied health assistant intervention (equals two more treatments) whilst an inpatient in acute hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
modified IOWA Level of Assistance Scale
Time Frame: 5 days
Functional score measuring 6 mobility domains
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of stay - acute and rehabilitation
Time Frame: participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay - average one month
the length of acute hospital stay and rehabilitation stay - until discharge home or to a long term facility
participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay - average one month
timed up and go
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days
Glasgow Outcomes Score -Extended
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
discharge destination
Time Frame: participants will be followed until discharge from the acute hospital - average 10 days
discharge destination from the acute hospital - options include: home, fast stream rehabilitation, slow stream rehabilitation, long term facility
participants will be followed until discharge from the acute hospital - average 10 days
physical readiness for discharge
Time Frame: average one month
when a patient is deemed physically ready go home - eg can access their house and mobilise within house and outdoors
average one month
12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lara A Kimmel, B.Physio, The Alfred

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 32/14

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

3
Subscribe