Depression Decision Aid: Feasibility Pilot

January 23, 2017 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Electronic Depression Decision Aid for Nurses in Primary Care: Development and Implementation in a Diverse Low-Income Population

The goal of this proposed pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a Depression Decision Aid (DDA) protocol integrated into the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and used by nurses with depressed ambulatory care patients. The Depression Decision Aid protocol is a streamlined adaptation of an in-person Shared Decision-Making (SDM) intervention, and its goal is to increase patient involvement in clinically appropriate treatment decision-making as a way of strengthening treatment engagement and outcomes. The protocol guides ambulatory care nurses in helping depressed patients (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] >10) develop informed treatment preferences through a process of education and values clarification. We will target patients in the general medical clinic, whether currently receiving depression treatment or not, because depression is highly prevalent but often poorly managed in this population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aims of this project are to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an electronic Depression Decision Aid protocol with nurses and patients using questionnaire and administrative data.

One to two nurses will deliver the Decision Aid protocol to 40 low-income patients (aged 21 and over) scoring >10 via routine PHQ-9 screening. Consenting nurses will be assessed regarding their satisfaction with the protocol following its use with each patient subject. Nurse fidelity to the protocol will be evaluated via their documentation of protocol use in the EHR. Consenting patient subjects will be assessed at baseline; week 1 to determine their decision about depression treatment, satisfaction with the decision-making process; and week 12 to determine treatment initiation or change, treatment adherence, and depressive status. Medical records will also be examined for documentation of medication prescription and other depression treatments.

The study will test the following hypothesis concerning the Depression Decision Aid protocol:

1. Feasibility and Acceptability: a) At least 85% of each nurse's intervention sessions will meet fidelity standards via Electronic Health Record (EHR) data; b) Nurses will report high levels of satisfaction with the Decision Aid; c) Patients will report high levels of satisfaction with the decision-making process;

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10451
        • Lincoln Hospital- the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21 years and older
  • Medical outpatient presenting to the Lincoln Hospital ambulatory care clinic or geriatric sub-specialty clinic
  • Screen positive for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score of 10 or greater)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of significant alcohol or substance abuse, psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder
  • High suicide risk
  • Cognitive impairment: Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) score less than 24.
  • Acute or severe medical illness (ie. delirium, metastatic cancer, decompensated cardiac, liver, or kidney failure, major surgery, stroke, or myocardial infarction during the three months prior to entry.
  • Inability to speak English or Spanish
  • Aphasia interfering with communication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Depression Decision Aid protocol
The Depression Decision Aid protocol, integrated into the Electronic Health Record (EHR), is a streamlined adaptation of an in-person Shared Decision-Making intervention. Shared decision-making, in contrast to traditional medical decision-making, involves a collaborative process where patients discuss personal values and preferences and clinicians provide information to arrive at an agreed upon treatment decision. The focus of the intervention is to empower the elderly depressed primary care patients and help them efficiently arrive at a treatment decision that can be successfully implemented.
The Depression Decision Aid protocol, integrated into the Electronic Health Record (EHR), is a streamlined adaptation of an in-person Shared Decision-Making intervention.
Other Names:
  • Shared Decision Making

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of Depression Decision Aid protocol
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of nurse's intervention sessions based on Electronic Health Record data
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with the Decision Aid Measure
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Nurse Satisfaction Scale includes a measure of usefulness, clarity, ease of use, and feasibility in terms of timing when using the Decision Aid.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick J Raue, Ph.D., Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1401014663
  • P30MH085943 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Depression Decision Aid

Subscribe