A Comparison of UGBRS Block and Local Infiltration

A Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block and Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Control in Children With Acute Appendicitis

In this research study, the investigators are trying to find out which of the two methods of injecting local anesthetics (at the site of the belly button cut or by ultrasound guided rectus sheath block) will provide better pain relief and less need for pain medication after surgery in children undergoing single incision laparoscopic appendectomy.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Appendicitis
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: UGBRSB; Procedure: Local Infiltration

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common procedure in pediatric surgery. For single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA), the laparoscope and other instruments are inserted with the aid of a large trocar through a single umbilical incision. Laparoscopic appendectomy via a single umbilical incision is a less invasive procedure associated with minimal or no scarring compared to the traditional laparoscopic operation. Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting are common problems encountered with laparoscopic appendectomy and other abdominal operations. As an established standard practice at Texas Children's Hospital, pain control in these patients is achieved by intravenous opioids via a patient controlled device along with ketorolac tromethamine, as well as local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) performed by surgeon or bilateral rectus sheath blocks as described below.

The umbilical area is innervated by the bilateral 9th, 10th and 11th intercostal nerves, which run between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle. At the lateral edge of the rectus muscle, the nerves perforate the rectus sheath and innervate the rectus muscle. Anterior cutaneous branches cross the muscle supplying the skin of the umbilical area. Successful blockade of the relevant intercostal nerves within the rectus sheath can provide effective pain relief for umbilical and other midline surgical incisions. Rectus sheath block has also been shown to give better pain control when compared with intra-incisional infiltration and intra-peritoneal injection in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Recently, it has been shown that there is improved efficacy and a decreased local anesthetic requirement when ultrasound is used to guide rectus sheath block in children undergoing umbilical hernia repair. However, data comparing pain after ultrasound guided bilateral rectus sheath block (UGBRSB) and peri-umbilical local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) for SILA are not available. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is high after laparoscopic surgery, with a dose-related increase noted when opioids are used in the postoperative period. Effective regional anesthesia may decrease opioids use and consequently reduce the incidence of PONV and improve patient satisfaction.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 50
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Texas
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • Texas Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 6 years to 17 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• 1) Acute appendicitis (2) Age 6 - 17 years (3) American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I - III (4) Patients undergoing SILA procedure performed by a single pediatric surgeon (Dr. Ashwin P. Pimpalwar) (5) Patients judged by parents, physicians and other caretakers as being capable of using the patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

Exclusion Criteria:

• 1) Patients who are not scheduled to undergo the procedure of SILA. (2) Patients with allergies to local anesthetics (3) Patients who do not understand or cannot use the pain rating scale because of developmental delay, language or other issues. (4) Patients with concomitant major cardio-respiratory disorders. (5) Patients judged to be incapable of using the PCA device (6) Patients who refuse to participate in the study

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Triple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: UGBRSB; Under sterile conditions,the posterior rectus sheath will be identified by ultrasound, and an insulated 22 gauge 50 mm needle inserted till the tip is seen to be directly between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Bupivacaine 0.25% (0.2 ml/kg with maximum 5 ml in each side) will be injected observing the spread on the ultrasound image.	Procedure: UGBRSB; Under sterile conditions,the posterior rectus sheath will be identified by ultrasound, and an insulated 22 gauge 50 mm needle inserted till the tip is seen to be directly between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Bupivacaine 0.25% (0.2 ml/kg with maximum 5 ml in each side) will be injected observing the spread on the ultrasound image.; Other Names: Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block
Active Comparator: Local infiltration; In those patients randomized to the LAI group, the surgeon will perform infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum, 10 ml) around the incision.	Procedure: Local Infiltration; In those patients randomized to the LAI group, the surgeon will perform infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum, 10 ml) around the incision; Other Names: Local Anesthetic Infiltration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Comparing the amount of morphine used during the first 48 hurs after surgery	48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Comparing pain scores during the first 48 hours after surgery	48 hours
Comparing time to first rescue analgesia	48 hours
Comparing rescue analgesia used in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit (PACU)	48 hours
Comparing incidence of side effects of opioids such as respiratory depression, itching, nausea, and vomiting, dysphoria	48 hours
Comparing time to achieving discharge readiness in PACU	48 hours
Comparing time to achieving discharge rediness from the hospital	48 hours
comparing patient and parental satisfaction with pain management	48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Baylor College of Medicine
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Yang Liu, M.D>, Baylor College of Medicine

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 24, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 28, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): February 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): July 21, 2015
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 20, 2015
• Last Verified: July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Infections; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastroenteritis; Intestinal Diseases; Cecal Diseases; Intraabdominal Infections; Appendicitis; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Central Nervous System Depressants; Peripheral Nervous System Agents; Sensory System Agents; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local
• Other Study ID Numbers: H28183