Decentralized Dietary UC Pilot Trial

November 5, 2015 updated by: Transparency Life Sciences

A Pilot Study Investigating a Decentralized Approach to Studying Dietary Intervention in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

This study is designed to assess differences in remote and on-site patient study participation in the State of Massachusetts, as well as the significance of dietary interventions and their impact on UC. The study will activate one site with a Principal Investigator who will utilize each subject's local care system (local Gastroenterologist) to collect study data, along with telemonitoring and video visits, to make key study assessments and decisions regarding subjects' progression in the study.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Brookline, Massachusetts, United States, 02467
        • Recruiting
        • Crohn's and Colitis Center at Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joshua Korzenik, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females between the ages of 18 and 80, inclusive, who reside in the state of Massachusetts.
  2. Ability and willingness to provide documented informed consent and to comply with the study procedures, including in-person visits for Arm 1 and video visits for Arm 2.
  3. Documented history of moderate to severe active UC
  4. Disease duration of ≥12 weeks at the time of screening (diagnosed according to American College of Gastroenterology practice guidelines)
  5. Screening fecal calprotectin>350 mg/g
  6. Diagnosis of moderately to severely active UC, including historical endoscopy sub score ≥2; a rectal bleeding sub score ≥1 and disease activity a minimum of 25 cm from the anal verge.
  7. Documented (via video or report) endoscopy performed within 2 years prior to randomization.
  8. Access to a computer or mobile device with internet connection and an active email address.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior extensive colonic resection, subtotal or total colectomy or planned surgery for UC
  2. Past or present ileostomy or colostomy
  3. Short bowel syndrome
  4. Diagnosis of indeterminate colitis, fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon
  5. Past or present fistula or abdominal abscess
  6. History or current evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia
  7. Use of tube feeding, defined formula diets or parenteral alimentation/nutrition which has not been discontinued ≥3 weeks prior to study enrollment
  8. Use of anticoagulants, herbal supplements and omega-3/fish oil supplements during the study
  9. Crohn's Disease
  10. Significant uncontrolled co-morbidity, such as neurological, cardiac (e.g., moderate to severe heart failure NYHA class III/IV), pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine or gastrointestinal disorders
  11. History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse within 6 months prior to screening
  12. Pregnant females, those intending to become pregnant, and those who are lactating
  13. Current participation in any other clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional

Subjects in Study Arm 1 will undergo a screening process, and if randomized, will follow a traditional, site-based clinical trial model and undergo a baseline visit and 3 more in-person visits with the Principal Investigator (total of 4 visits).

Subjects in each Study Arm will be randomized (2:1) to follow one of two dietary regimens during the study: the Combined Anti-Inflammatory Diet (CAID) or Control (standard nutritional advice).

The CAID requires participants to modify their diet to include certain types of foods that may have anti-inflammatory properties. Participants on the CAID will be required to abstain from red meat and alcoholic beverages.
Active Comparator: Remote

Subjects in Study Arm 2 will undergo a screening process, and if randomized, will undergo one Baseline visit at the local Gastroenterologist's office and 4 video visits with the Principal Investigator. A mobile nurse will visit subjects at a distant location (such as their home) to obtain blood samples at visits 1 and 4.

Subjects in each Study Arm will be randomized (2:1) to follow one of two dietary regimens during the study: the Combined Anti-Inflammatory Diet (CAID) or Control (standard nutritional advice).

The CAID requires participants to modify their diet to include certain types of foods that may have anti-inflammatory properties. Participants on the CAID will be required to abstain from red meat and alcoholic beverages.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endoscopy Mayo Score Comparison (proportion of endoscopies to which an independent reader can successfully assign an endoscopic Mayo Clinic sub-score)
Time Frame: Week 1
Comparison of the proportion of endoscopies to which an independent reader can successfully assign an endoscopic Mayo Clinic sub-score between Study Arms 1 and 2.
Week 1
Compliance (proportion of missing or non-evaluable records per patient and the proportion of patients who did not complete the study)
Time Frame: Week 7
Comparison of the proportion of missing or non-evaluable records per patient and the proportion of patients who did not complete the study between Study Arms 1 and 2.
Week 7
Combined Anti-inflammatory Diet (Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin/microbiome levels)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 5 and 7
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin/microbiome levels between Control (standard nutritional advice) and CAID (dietary intervention) arms.
Weeks 0, 5 and 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mayo Score and Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Difference (Difference in partial Mayo Clinic sub-Score and Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index)
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 7
Difference in partial Mayo Clinic sub-Score and Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index between Control and CAID (dietary intervention).
Weeks 1 and 7
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Weekly through week 11
Difference in incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) between Study Arms 1 and 2 and between Control and CAID (dietary intervention) arms.
Weekly through week 11
Dietary Compliance Comparison
Time Frame: Week 7
Comparison of patient non-compliance events with dietary regimen between arms 1 and 2.
Week 7
Participant Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: Week 7
Difference in reported patient satisfaction with trial participation between arms 1 and 2.
Week 7
Mayo Score Discrepancy Frequency
Time Frame: Week 7
Frequency of discrepancy between Principal Investigator-assessed and gastroenterologist-assessed Mayo Clinic Endoscopy Sub-Scores for Arm 2 patients at baseline.
Week 7
Physician's Global Assessment Discrepancy Frequency
Time Frame: Week 7
Frequency of discrepancy between Principal Investigator-assessed and gastroenterologist-assessed Mayo Clinic Physician's Global Assessment Sub-Score for Arm 2 patients at baseline.
Week 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tomasz Sablinski, MD, PhD, Transparency Life Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe