Swimming Training Repercussion on Metabolic and Structural Bone Development; Benefits of the Incorporation of Whole Body Vibration or Plyometric Training: The RENACIMIENTO Project

March 25, 2025 updated by: German Vicente-Rodríguez, Universidad de Zaragoza

Swimming Training Repercussion on Metabolic and Structural Bone Development; Benefits of the Incorporation of Whole Body Vibration or Plyometric Training. The RENACIMIENTO Project

Swimming training is associated with decreased bone mass and lower bone mass acquisition during growth periods, mainly when compared to other weight-bearing sports. Little information is available in adolescents pointing in the same direction but still controversial.

On the other hand, bone strength do not only depends on bone mass but on bone structure and microarchitecture. The cross sectional area, cortex thickness or trabecular density are important aspects of bone health. There are few studies on the effect of swimming on bone architecture of adolescents. This information is relevant for present and future health of adolescents practicing swimming and for all the organizations promoting this sport. Jumping and whole body vibration training programs seem to elicit important osteogenic effects; however, there is little information on this regard in adolescent population, even less in these adolescents with potentially decreased bone acquisition such as swimmers.

The main aims of this research project are therefore, to analyze the effect of swimming training on bone mass, metabolism, structure and architecture in adolescents analyzing possible relationships among them. Secondly, to test whether including short boots of jumping or whole body vibration may be able to palliate the possible deleterious effects of swimming and facilitate a normal or even healthier bone development. And finally to study the durability of training-related bone gains over time.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 14 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Specific for the swimmers: With a history of training at least 3 years for more than 6 hours per week and currently still training
  • Specific for the control group: Subjects that do not perform more than 3 hours of physical activity per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-caucasian
  • Smoking
  • Taking medication affecting bone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Swimmers
Swimmers that continue their normal swimming activity
Experimental: WBV swimmers
Swimmers that perform a whole-body vibration training
Swimmers will perform a 15 minute whole-body vibration training 3 times per week. This intervention will be performed with a Powerplate®. The vibration protocol will be progressive starting with 30 Hz and an amplitude op 4 mm reaching at the end of the protocol 38 Hz and 4 mm amplitude.
Experimental: Plyometric swimmers
Swimmers that perform a plyometric training
Swimmers will perform a jumping intervention, 15 minutes 3 times per week. Jumps will include drop jumps, one leg jumps, squat jumps and countermovement jumps.
No Intervention: Sedentary controls
Controls that do not perform swimming or other physical activities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in body composition during 3 years evaluated by dual energy X-ray
Time Frame: Change from baseline in body composition at 3 years
Change from baseline in body composition at 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in bone strength and structure evaluated by peripheral quantitative computed tomography
Time Frame: Change from baseline in bone strength and structure at 3 years
Change from baseline in bone strength and structure at 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: German Vicente-Rodríguez, PhD, GENUD Research Group, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DEP2011-29093

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Body Composition

Clinical Trials on Whole-body vibration (Powerplate®)

Subscribe