New Lung Ventilation Strategies Guided by Transpulmonary Pressure in VV-ECMO for Severe ARDS

June 29, 2020 updated by: Rui Wang
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been widely used in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). But how to choose mechanical ventilation strategy is still not clear for severe ARDS patients supported by ECMO. Our previous work found that, compared to the traditional "lung rest" strategy, transpulmonary pressure guide new lung ventilation strategy can better maintain lung volume reduction lung collapse, atelectasis occurs. The severe ARDS patients receiving ECMO therapy were randomized divided into a new ventilation strategy group and the conventional ventilation strategy group. The new ventilation strategy is transpulmonary pressure guide ventilator setting method, and the conventional ventilation strategy is Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guide ventilation method. Compare the difference between the two groups of patients in lung injury, and explore the lung protection mechanism of new lung ventilation strategies guided by transpulmonary pressure. Our research group considered that transpulmonary pressure guide new lung ventilation strategy can provide more effective lung protection. And it will be further used in clinical work.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100020
        • Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ARDS cause reversible;
  • Pure oxygen is given, but PaO2/FiO2<80;
  • P(A-a)O2>600mmHg;
  • Murray score≥3.0;
  • pH<7.2;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • peak inspiratory pressure>30cmH2O;
  • high FiO2>0.8;
  • ventilation>7 days;
  • contraindication to heparinization;
  • non-reversible central nervous system injury
  • chronic disease with a short life expectancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: New Strategy
New Strategy: use transpulmonary pressure guide new lung ventilation strategy in ECMO for severe ARDS patients
New ventilation strateg: pressure assist control mode; inspiratory pressure was lowered to keep Ppeak less than 25cmH2O; set the PEEP at such a level that expiratory transpulmonary pressure stays between 0 and 5 cmH2O; respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute; FiO2 less than 0.5.
Other: Conventional Strategy
Conventional Strategy: use conventional ventilation strategy (ELSO guide ventilation strategy) in ECMO for severe ARDS patients
Conventional ventilation strategy: pressure assist control mode; keep the Ppeak between 20 and 25 cmH2O; set PEEP between 10 and 15 cmH2O; respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute; FiO2 less than 0.5.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion weaned from VV-ECMO
Time Frame: After patients randomized grouping 60 days
Respiratory failure was alleviated and then ECMO withdrawal could be considered
After patients randomized grouping 60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
60-day mortality
Time Frame: After patients randomized grouping 60 days
Mortality after patients randomized grouping 60 days
After patients randomized grouping 60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bing Sun, master, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult

Clinical Trials on New lung ventilation strategy

Subscribe