Assessment of Shared Decision Making Aids in Asthma

August 3, 2015 updated by: Louis-Philippe Boulet, Laval University

Utility of Two Patients Decision Aids About Asthma Inhaled Controller Medication Use in Adult Patients With Asthma

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of shared decision making aids is more effective than usual care in improving asthma knowledge, lessening decisional conflict, and enhancing adherence to treatments and asthma control in adult patients with mild to severe asthma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men or women, aged 18 to 65 years;
  2. Current diagnosis of mild to severe asthma; 2.1) Asthma diagnosis will be made upon one of the following criteria: 2.1.1) Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) increases by at least 12% after the use of a bronchodilator (and a minimum ≥ 200 mL); 2.1.2) Current asthma symptoms and a positive methacholine challenge test (20% fall in FEV1 after inhalation of a provocative dose of methacholine 16 mg/mL); 2.1.3) A respirologist's current diagnosis of asthma found in the patient's medical report. 2.2) Severity of asthma will be assessed according to prescribed pharmacotherapy, as suggested by the 2012 Canadian Thoracic Society Guidelines: 2.2.1) Patients with mild asthma using SABA as well as low doses (≤250 mcg/day beclomethasone or equivalent) of inhaled glucocorticosteroids; 2.2.2) Patients with moderate asthma using SABA as well as low to moderate doses (250mcg/day < dose ≤500 mcg/day beclomethasone or equivalent) of inhaled glucocorticosteroids, with or without additional therapy (LABA or LTRA); 2.2.3) Patients with severe asthma using high doses (>500 mcg/day beclomethasone or equivalent) of inhaled glucocorticosteroids, and additional pharmacotherapy (LABA, LTRA, or Prednisone), and SABA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD);
  2. Education on asthma in the last 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient decision aids
Participants read and fill a patient decision aid before being provided education on asthma.
The patient decision aid is a 12-page A3 size color-printed booklet entitled "Should I take asthma inhaled controller medication to optimize asthma control?"
No Intervention: Usual care
Participants do not read and fill a patient decision aid before being provided education on asthma.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in asthma knowledge at 2 months, measured by QCALF score
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)
Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)
Change from baseline in decisional conflict at 2 months, measured by DCS score
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)
Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in adherence to treatment at 2 months, measured by questionnaire
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)
Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)
Change from baseline in asthma control at 2 months, measured by ACSS score
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)
Visit 1 (baseline) and visit 2 (2-month follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Patient decision aid

Subscribe