Neural Mechanisms of Tactile Priming on Social Perceptions - Pilot Study

August 9, 2016 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
The investigators measure brain responses of healthy participants while they perform evaluation tasks inside the fMRI. For each task the participants were primed with tactile stimuli. Results should demonstrate engagement of sensorimotor brain regions after priming, hence confirming embodiment theories.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Brain responses of healthy participants were recorded with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). While being scanned participants were asked to recommend punishments similar to judges or juries for perpetrators across different scenarios. In addition, participants were primed before reading the scenario by using different materials. Based on recent theories about "embodied cognition" and extralegal factors investigators hypothesize that those primes may influence the harshness of punishments recommended by the participants. If those processes engage sensorimotor cortices, the results would strongly support theories of embodied cognition.

The results would help the investigators to understand the neural correlates of priming processes. These unconscious complex processes of perception may be important for hospital patients. Thus, beneficial haptic experiences during the hospital stay may contribute to successful recovery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12247
        • Medical School Berlin
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, CCM, Charité - University Medicine Berlin
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensvie Care Medicine CVK/CCM, Charité - University Medicine Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy adult male and female subjects

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female healthy participants
  • age 18 - 40 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiac pacemaker
  • metallic implants
  • ferromagnetic parts in / at the body
  • tatoos
  • vessel surgery
  • tinnitus
  • epilepsia
  • claustrophobia
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Healthy participants
Male or female healthy participants

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensorimotor brain activation
Time Frame: The participantes will be followed up for the duration of fMRI-scan, an exspected average of 1 hour
The primary objective of this study is to examine neural correlates for embodied cognitions. We use an fMRI-approach to test if healthy participants are prone to non-conscious tactile priming effects during evaluation processes. Investigators measure the outcome by examining BOLD Response in the sensorimotor cortices (Maximum Peak in Primary somatosensory Cortex, SI). BOLD Responses will be analyzed using the Software SPM 8.
The participantes will be followed up for the duration of fMRI-scan, an exspected average of 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systematic changes for evaluation processes
Time Frame: The participants will be followed up for the duration of fMRI-scan, an exspected average of 1 hour
1. We examine if tactile priming leads to systematic behavioral changes for evaluation processes. During the fMRI participants were asked to read scenarios and subsequently perform evaluation processes on a likert scale 0 to 5 (0 = mild punishment; 5 = hard punishment) .
The participants will be followed up for the duration of fMRI-scan, an exspected average of 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 10, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SozPrime

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

3
Subscribe