Community Point Distribution of Insecticide Treated Bed Nets

August 4, 2015 updated by: IDinsight

Measuring Attendance of Community Point Distribution of Insecticide-treated Bed Nets and the Impact of Community Health Worker Hang-up in Rural Zambia: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Cost Analysis

All households in three zones in Zambia's Eastern Province were invited to attend a community point distribution of insecticide treated bed nets (ITNs). Households were then randomized to different intervals for a community health worker (CHW) hang-up visit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Households were asked to attend a community point distribution of ITNs in one of three zones in Zambia's Eastern Province. Households that had been registered to receive ITNs were then randomized to one of five groups that received a CHW visit at different intervals. Group 1 was visited 1-3 days after distribution, group 2 was visited 5-7 days after, group 3 was visited 10-12 days after, group 4 was visited 15-17 days after, and group 5 did not receive a hang-up visit. Groups 1-4 were categorized as having received a hang-up visit and group 5 was categorized as not having received a hang-up visit. All households in all five groups were visited at 7-11 weeks after the distribution and again at 5-6 months after the distribution to assess short- and medium-term ITN retention and usage.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

560

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Household was pre-registered by the National Malaria Control Centre to receive ITNs ahead of the start of study activities.
  • Household was located in one of the three study areas of Mukonka, Lukwipa, and Chipeketi in Rufunsa District, Zambia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Household was not pre-registered to receive ITNs
  • Household was not located in one of the three study areas

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 - 1-3 days
Community health worker hang-up visit 1-3 days after the community point distribution
Households were invited to a central location in their community (i.e. school, church, etc) where they received their allotment of ITNs (one per sleeping space, as pre-registered ahead of study activities). Households were provided with malaria prevention messaging at the distribution. They were called up one-by-one in front of other members of the community to mitigate misrepresentation of households.
CHWs visited households to take stock of how many ITNs that were distributed during the distribution were hung and to hang any unhung ITNs.
Experimental: Group 2 - 5-7 days
Community health worker hang-up visit 5-7 days after the community point distribution
Households were invited to a central location in their community (i.e. school, church, etc) where they received their allotment of ITNs (one per sleeping space, as pre-registered ahead of study activities). Households were provided with malaria prevention messaging at the distribution. They were called up one-by-one in front of other members of the community to mitigate misrepresentation of households.
CHWs visited households to take stock of how many ITNs that were distributed during the distribution were hung and to hang any unhung ITNs.
Experimental: Group 3 - 10-12 days
Community health worker hang-up visit 10-12 days after the community point distribution
Households were invited to a central location in their community (i.e. school, church, etc) where they received their allotment of ITNs (one per sleeping space, as pre-registered ahead of study activities). Households were provided with malaria prevention messaging at the distribution. They were called up one-by-one in front of other members of the community to mitigate misrepresentation of households.
CHWs visited households to take stock of how many ITNs that were distributed during the distribution were hung and to hang any unhung ITNs.
Experimental: Group 4 - 15-17 days
Community health worker hang-up visit 15-17 days after the community point distribution
Households were invited to a central location in their community (i.e. school, church, etc) where they received their allotment of ITNs (one per sleeping space, as pre-registered ahead of study activities). Households were provided with malaria prevention messaging at the distribution. They were called up one-by-one in front of other members of the community to mitigate misrepresentation of households.
CHWs visited households to take stock of how many ITNs that were distributed during the distribution were hung and to hang any unhung ITNs.
Placebo Comparator: Group 5 - No hang-up visit
Did not receive any hang-up visit after the community point distribution
Households were invited to a central location in their community (i.e. school, church, etc) where they received their allotment of ITNs (one per sleeping space, as pre-registered ahead of study activities). Households were provided with malaria prevention messaging at the distribution. They were called up one-by-one in front of other members of the community to mitigate misrepresentation of households.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Community point distribution attendance
Time Frame: At time 0
The percentage of pre-registered households that collected ITNs at the community point distributions on November 14, 19, and 21, 2013.
At time 0
Self-installation of ITNs
Time Frame: Each group is randomized to receive a community health worker visit after a different duration, an average of 7 days after the point distribution
The percentage of ITNs distributed to a household that the CHW found hanging at his/her visit.
Each group is randomized to receive a community health worker visit after a different duration, an average of 7 days after the point distribution
Household ITN retention
Time Frame: An average of 9 weeks after community point distribution
The percentage of ITNs distributed to a household that were found still in the household at the 7-11 week follow-up.
An average of 9 weeks after community point distribution
Household ITN retention
Time Frame: An average of 5.5 months after community point distribution
The percentage of ITNs distributed to a household that were found still in the household at the 5-6 month follow-up.
An average of 5.5 months after community point distribution
Household percentage of ITNs hung
Time Frame: An average of 9 weeks after community point distribution
The percentage of ITNs distributed to a household that were found hanging during the 7-11 week follow-up.
An average of 9 weeks after community point distribution
Household percentage of ITNs hung
Time Frame: An average of 5.5 months after community point distribution
The percentage of ITNs distributed to a household that were found hanging during the 5-6 month follow-up.
An average of 5.5 months after community point distribution
Household percentage of sleeping spaces covered
Time Frame: An average of 9 weeks after community point distribution
The percentage of sleeping spaces in the household that were covered by an ITN distributed during the community point distribution at the 7-11 week follow-up.
An average of 9 weeks after community point distribution
Household percentage of sleeping spaces covered
Time Frame: An average of 5.5 months after community point distribution
The percentage of sleeping spaces in the household that were covered by an ITN distributed during the community point distribution at the 5-6 month follow-up.
An average of 5.5 months after community point distribution

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 003 (NuSkin International)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on Community point distribution

3
Subscribe