DESIPHER_Speech Degradation as an Indicator of Physiological Degeneration in ALS

August 7, 2020 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

DESIPHER Speech Degradation as an Indicator of Physiological Degeneration in ALS

A disease called Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or ALS), which leads to difficulty swallowing, breathing, and movement, has been found to be higher for those serving in the military than in the general population. There are approximately 4,200 Veterans with ALS and roughly 1,000 new cases each year. When doctors attempt to determine the degree to which an ALS patient is suffering from the disease, they apply tests that are "graded" by experts. However, this approach to testing patients may not be very accurate. Researchers aim to use a system called DESIPHER to "listen" to ALS patients and find speech mistakes related to their condition. Researchers believe that, by detecting different types of errors, DESIPHER serves as a new kind of indicator of medical problems such as difficulty breathing or swallowing, without human "grading". This may also lead to a better system for automatically understanding ALS patients' speech.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In 2008, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or Lou Gehrig's Disease became a presumptively compensable (service connected) disease as the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee stated an association between the development of ALS and military service. According to the IOM report, military service increases life risk of ALS by 1.5 fold. There are approximately 4,200 Veterans with ALS and roughly 1,000 new cases each year. At the Tampa VA, since 2007, there has been a consistent rise in the number of Veterans diagnosed and treated with ALS.

Most physiological assessments that are commonly used to determine the functional status of patients with ALS require trained clinical personnel to administer and interpret the results. The investigators propose to use automatic speech understanding and machine learning software (DESIPHER) to: identify speech pathologies and use them to predict other aspects of physiological degeneration associated with ALS (e.g., respiratory difficulty or inability to swallow), and ultimately improve speech recognition for those with speech impairments. The investigators expect this to improve the ability to appropriately identify and intervene when Veterans with ALS are at risk of serious adverse medical issues such as respiratory failure and aspiration. The investigators postulate that analyzing the overall divergence of (impaired) speech, from a "normal" baseline, will prove to be more robust and a better marker for involvement than others that have been proposed.

Specific research questions to be addressed by this study are: (1) Is it possible to train a speech recognition system to adapt to increasingly more frequent language/speech errors of particular types, to produce an accurate textual transcript that would be readable by an ALS patient's caregiver or physician? (2) Are specific changes in physiological functioning: Forced Vital Capacity, tongue strength, speech velocity, weight (loss), aspiration risk, or psychological distress, reflected in different types of language/speech errors associated with ALS?

By understanding how speech functioning correlates with the degree to which other biophysical functioning has degraded, it is possible to apply a new, non-invasive measure for assessing the functionality of an ALS patient. In addition, the features associated with speech degradation it is possible to adapt existing speech recognition software to a patient's speech as it evolves over time, so that the quality of life for patients may be improved through conversation with a computer.

Respiratory failure is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in ALS patients. The investigators expect that the method of analyzing speech will present an excellent biomarker for respiratory function, as there is an expected increase in pauses during speech due to the necessity of increased frequency of respirations, a decrease in loudness, and decreased overall velocity of speech. A second major cause of death is aspiration. As the articular muscles decline, the investigators expect to note a decrease in the clarity of speech. Speech involvement often precedes swallowing involvement in ALS; thus, the investigators expect that increasing "speech divergence" will indicate potential aspiration risk.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A Cohort of Veteran diagnosed with ALS seen at the Tampa VA

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans will be diagnosed with ALS
  • Native speakers of U.S. English
  • Will have bulbar involvement identified during initial ALS inpatient evaluation
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) of greater than 50% of the expected value for age
  • An Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) Score of 40 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of dementia
  • FVC less than 50%
  • Inability to speak
  • Or inability to follow directions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Veterans With ALS
This Cohort Study will admit all eligible, interested Veterans diagnosed with ALS who meet the inclusion criteria.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Percent of Expected Lung Force Vital Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, and every 3 months up to 24 months
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) measures the ability of the lung to move air. The change in FVC was calculated from the initial time point to either the end of study (24 months) or to final visit due to either death or loss to followup.
Baseline, and every 3 months up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Tongue Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Month intervals up to 24 months, calculated from the initial time point to either the end of study (24 months) or to final visit due to either death or loss to followup
A physiological measurement of tongue muscle strength, in multiple directions. A force measured with Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)
Baseline, 3 Month intervals up to 24 months, calculated from the initial time point to either the end of study (24 months) or to final visit due to either death or loss to followup
Change in Speech - as Measured by Speech Divergence
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Month intervals up to 24 months, calculated from the initial time point to either the end of study (24 months) or to final visit due to either death or loss to followup
A measure looking at changes in vocal characteristics away from standard language. Speech Divergence is a novel calculated measure based on identifying changes to 13 characteristics of speech. The score can range from 0-13. Zero would represent normal speech, while 13 would be distorted speech along all parameters.
Baseline, 3 Month intervals up to 24 months, calculated from the initial time point to either the end of study (24 months) or to final visit due to either death or loss to followup

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Subscribe