Effect of Active-Passive Trainer Cycling on Multiple Sclerosis

August 18, 2017 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

The Effect of Cycling Using Active-passive Trainers on Spasticity, Cardiovascular Fitness, Function and Quality of Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis

This randomised controlled trial aims to explore the effectiveness of a four week programme of exercise using lower limb Active Passive trainer (APT) (MOTOmed trainer) in terms of spasticity in people with moderate to severe Multiple Sclerosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Exercise is beneficial for people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). However, exercise options for those with moderate to high levels of disability are limited. Cycling, delivered with an Active Passive Trainer (APT) is one exercise option often offered within rehabilitation/exercise settings and many pwMS buy APTs for home use. Anecdotally, pwMS report they feel better and their spasticity reduces after APT cycling, however there is a lack of evidence to support this.

30 pwMS will be recruited from the Physical Disability Rehabilitation Unit at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, and randomised to APT + usual care or usual care only. Those in the APT group will receive 30 minutes of APT (2 mins passive warm up, 26 mins active cycling and 2 mins passive cool down), five days per week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures will be cardiovascular fitness measured using the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), spasticity assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88), function assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Timed 25 foot walk test (T25FW), Quality of Life measured by MSQOL-54. Outcome measures will be assessed in both groups before and after the 4 week intervention period. Symmetry, distance cycled and power will be recorded following each cycling session in the intervention group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
        • Physical Disability Rehabilitation Unit (PDRU), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have a confirmed diagnosis of progressive MS
  • are aged over 18 years
  • have an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of between 6.5 (requires two walking aids - pair of canes, crutches, etc - to walk about 20m without resting) and 8.5 (essentially restricted to bed much of day); has some effective use of arms (retains some self care functions) and spasticity in their lower limbs (self reported)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment (cannot understand instructions)
  • other co-morbidities which would preclude them taking part in exercise
  • visual impairment (such that they cannot see the screen on the APT)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Usual care - conventional, personalised in-patient rehabilitation 4 weeks duration
Personalised in-patient rehabilitation programme
Experimental: Intervention group
Usual care - conventional, personalised in-patient rehabilitation - plus APT cycling programme 4 weeks duration
Personalised in-patient rehabilitation programme
APT for 30 minutes per day on 5 days per week for 4 weeks: 2 minute warm up consisting of passive cycling, where the legs of the participant are moved passively by the APT at 10 revolutions per min (rpm). Next, the participant will cycle for up to 26 minutes, at 60rpm. In this phase, the participant is required to actively cycle and to maintain a symmetrical pattern of movement using the feedback on the display. If the participant is unable to actively cycle at any point during the 26 minute exercise period, or if they have a spasm, the MOTOmed APT will revert to the passive mode. The final phase is a cool down where participants again will have 2 minutes of passive cycling at 10rpm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of spasticity on daily life scored on Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Score on Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88)
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spasticity scored on Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Score on Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Cardiovascular fitness calculated using Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Calculated Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES)
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Function - FIM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Score on Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Function - T25FW
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Timed 25-foot walk test (T25FW)
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Score on Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 scale
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
APT cycling performance - symmetry
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Proportion of time when effort of right versus left leg is evenly distributed ie 50%/50%
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
APT cycling performance - distance
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Distance cycled
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
APT cycling performance - power
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks
Overall power (measured in watts)
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorna Paul, BSc MPhil PhD, University of Glasgow

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GN15PY148
  • PRF-15-BO1 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust Award)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Usual care

3
Subscribe