Shared Decision Making to Improve Palliative Care in the Nursing Home

January 15, 2021 updated by: Debra Parker Oliver, Washington University School of Medicine
Twenty-eight percent of Americans over the age of 65 die in a nursing home. Research has found the quality of care of end-of-life care in nursing homes to have many challenges. It has also been documented that family members, especially those living at a distance, want to be involved in the care of their resident and family support can be beneficial to residents. Family members' involvement in decision-making in the nursing home setting improves outcomes for residents with life-limiting illnesses. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process wherein a healthcare choice is jointly made by a healthcare provider and a resident or resident's proxy, often a family member. This proposal seeks to facilitate SDM among family members, residents with life-limiting illnesses (who are not enrolled in hospice), and the nursing home care team. The overall research question (RQ) asks: To what extent are outcomes for family member and residents with life limiting illnesses associated with SDM via web-conferencing in the nursing home? The overall hypothesis (H) is that SDM among family members, residents (when possible), and skilled nursing home staff via web-conferencing will improve outcomes for family members and residents with life-limiting illnesses. This is an exploratory mixed methods randomized clinical trial pilot to test the effect of shared decision making using web-based conferencing on the depression and burden of family members and the pain of nursing home residents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Twenty-eight percent of Americans over the age of 65 die in a nursing home. Research has found that the quality of care at the end of life in these facilities is less than adequate. While some residents improve their care with the use of the Hospice Medicare benefit, considerable barriers remain for the majority of nursing home residents who do not enroll in hospice but have a serious illness. This project focuses on improving palliative care for geriatric nursing home residents who are not receiving hospice care. Two systematic reviews of end-of-life care in nursing homes found challenges in symptom burden, including unmanaged pain, inadequate discussions regarding goals of care and advance directives, poor communication, unmet family expectations, and inadequate staff education.

Residents' values, beliefs, and goals are often unknown by nursing home staff. Dementia, illness, or poor communication may prevent residents from articulating their wishes regarding care. In many cases, family members can act as mediators between the resident and staff as plans of care are developed and decisions are made. Despite the desire to remain involved in care of the nursing home resident, many family members are unable to be physically present in the nursing home and experience loss of control, dis-empowerment, and guilt. As frailty increases and goals of care become increasingly palliative, the frustrations and burdens for families can worsen. Family members, especially those living at a distance, want to be involved in the care of their resident, and their involvement in decision-making can improve outcomes for residents with serious illnesses.

This project facilitates SDM (shared decision making) among family members, residents with serious illnesses (not enrolled in hospice), and the nursing home care team. Based on a family-identified need, this proposal facilitates SDM among family members, residents with serious illnesses (not enrolled in hospice), and the nursing home care team.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65203
        • The Bluffs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Residents: Residents of The Bluffs nursing home, Columbia Missouri, over the age of 65, have at least one family member who agrees to participate, and have a serious life limiting illness. Residents enrolled in hospice or admitted to post hospital short term nursing home stay are excluded from participation.
  • Family Members: Identified family member by a resident or nursing home staff at The Bluffs, over the age of 18, without cognitive impairment, and with access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone device.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents enrolled in hospice can not participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
These family members and residents will use web conferencing technology to attend their quarterly care conferences
Individuals will communicate with the nursing home team via web conferencing during quarterly care conference
No Intervention: Control
These family and residents will receive usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Mean Patient Health Questionaire 9 Score From Baseline
Time Frame: 30 days
9 questions that indicate depression- taken at 30 days-Scale is 0-27 with higher values representing more depression. Measure collected every 30 days. Analysis is a comparison of means between the last measure taken and the baseline scores- with an overall average then computed.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Zarit Burden Interview
Time Frame: 30 days
Family members will report which of their responsibilities are perceived as burdensome. Response options for each item range from 0-4, and total scores range from 0-88, with higher scores indicating greater self-reported burden. Total score computed with an average score response.
30 days
Generalized Anxiety- 7
Time Frame: 30 days
7 questions that measure family member anxiety. It has 7 items and is scored 0-21 with a higher number representing greater anxiety. A total score is computed.
30 days
Caregiver Quality of Life
Time Frame: 30 days
4 questions pertaining to family quality of life. There are 4 items each scored 0-9 with a total score of 0 to 36 and higher scores representing poorer quality of life.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Debra Oliver, PhD, University of Missouri-Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2003012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe