Translation of an Intervention for Violence Among Adolescents in Emergency Departments

August 24, 2018 updated by: Maureen A Walton, University of Michigan
The translation study aims to refine and package intervention and training materials essential to translating an efficacious Emergency Department (ED) based Brief Intervention (BI) for violence (SafERteens) for two delivery methods: by ED staff on site or by therapist remotely. The study will take place in two phases. During the Effectiveness phase, we will determine the effectiveness of the interventions [on-site therapist delivered BI + text messages (n=133); remote therapy delivered BI + text messages (n=133)], as compared to a usual care control (brochure; n=133), on violence outcomes at 3 months. Note that tailored text messages will be delivered daily for the first month post-discharge, and three times per week in the second month post-discharge to the BI groups. During the Implementation phase, components of the RE-AIM model will be assessed over a 4-month period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants who screen positive for the study during the effectiveness phase, will be randomized to either the therapy or control at a rate of 2:1. Whether the participant receives the on-site therapist or the remote therapist will depend on day of week or shift. Over the course of the study, the proportion of shifts covered by on-site verses remote therapists will be balanced for seasonality and time of day (evening vs. day time).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

185

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Health System
      • Flint, Michigan, United States, 48503
        • Hurley Medical Center Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • youth (ages 14-18) presenting to the Hurley Medical Center (HMC) ED who are medically stable. Patients classified by medical staff as having unstable vital signs or "Level 1" trauma (e.g., unconscious, in need of immediate lifesaving procedures such as surgery), will be approached during their inpatient stay after stabilization (4% based on prior work);
  • access to a parent or guardian for consent among adolescents ages 14-17 (over 90% based on our prior work).
  • Positive past 3 month violence screen criteria: Youth will be eligible for the study if they endorse on self-report computer survey past three month violence perpetration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • youth who do not understand English
  • youth deemed unable to provide informed assent/consent by ED or research staff
  • prisoners at time of ED presentation.
  • youth who present to the ED as victims of sexual abuse or child abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: In-person Therapy by ED Staff
Brief 30 minute on-on-one private motivation interviewing intervention during emergency department care delivered by ED staff in-person.
A 30 minute private on-on-one brief motivational interviewing intervention given during emergency department care. The goal of the intervention was to reduce and prevention youth violence using techniques to change behavior in a respectful, non-confrontational, and non-judgmental manner. This one-on one counseling approach emphasizes individual choice and responsibility and differentiates between future goals/values and current behavior
Experimental: Remote Therapy by Research Staff
Brief 30 minute on-on-one private motivation interviewing intervention during emergency department care delivered remotely (over video) by research staff.
A 30 minute private on-on-one brief motivational interviewing intervention given during emergency department care. The goal of the intervention was to reduce and prevention youth violence using techniques to change behavior in a respectful, non-confrontational, and non-judgmental manner. This one-on one counseling approach emphasizes individual choice and responsibility and differentiates between future goals/values and current behavior
No Intervention: Comparison Group
This group will not receive an intervention, but did receive an informational pamphlet of resources in the area (enhanced usual care).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peer violence behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
as assessed with the modified Conflict Tactic Scale
Change from baseline to 3 months
Violence Consequences
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
as assessment with a scale developed in the original SafERteens study
Change from baseline to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Efficacy for non-violence
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
As assessed with the Teen Conflict Survey
Change from baseline to 3 months
Attitude towards viiolence
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
as assessed with the Attitudes Towards Violence Scale
Change from baseline to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R49CE002099 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe