Leukemia Stem Cell Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

April 19, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieve complete remission (CR) following induction chemotherapy. However, a large majority subsequently relapse and succumb to the disease. Currently, cytogenetics and molecular aberrations are the best prognostic indicators; however, these factors cannot prognosticate accurately for individual patients. Overall, the majority of patients with favorable or intermediate-risk AML will experience relapse. Prognosis after relapse is dismal with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. A leukemia stem cell (LSC) paradigm may explain this failure of CR to reliably translate into cure. This study is undertaken to determine whether the presence of LSCs has prognostic value as well as to determine whether the presence of LSCs has predictive value. This study has an observational component, whereby we intent evaluate whether the presence or absence of LSCs is prognostic. This study also has an interventional component in which it uses LSC status to determine whether favorable and intermediate risk AML patients in CR receive consolidation with chemotherapy or allogeneic HCT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Levine Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must have previously signed the specimen procurement protocol consent associated with the leukemia stem cell assay ("Step 1 informed consent") prior to starting AML therapy.
  2. Age 18 years and older
  3. New diagnosis of AML, other than APL, confirmed by bone marrow aspirate/biopsy and reviewed by an institutional hematopathologist
  4. Completion of induction therapy, as defined by the Investigator and post-induction bone marrow biopsy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude ability to follow study procedures.
  2. Indeterminate leukemia stem cell assay results at diagnosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Evaluable Cohort - Transplant Arm

Other - Standard of Care Consolidation (HCT)

Enrolled subjects that will contribute to the population of subjects who are evaluable for the primary and secondary objectives. This will not include any subjects who end up in either observational cohort. To be included in the evaluable cohort, the subject must meet the following requirements:

  1. Complete remission (CR1) from standard cytarabine or HMA-based induction therapy per standard clinical criteria (Cheson Criteria)
  2. Have confirmed presence of CD34+CD38-ALDHint population by flow cytometry at the diagnostic LSC assay (LSC0)
  3. Cytarabine-based induction subjects: Are candidates for (as determined by the investigator) and receive consolidation therapy (cytarabine-based chemotherapy or HCT); HMA-based induction subjects: Are candidates for (as determined by the investigator) and receive HCT
Allogeneic HCT
Other Names:
  • transplant, allo HCT, PBSCT, SCT, BMT
Other: Evaluable Cohort - Consolidation Chemo Arm

Other - Standard of Care Consolidation (cytarabine-based chemo)

Enrolled subjects that will contribute to the population of subjects who are evaluable for the primary and secondary objectives. This will not include any subjects who end up in either observational cohort. To be included in the evaluable cohort, the subject must meet the following requirements:

  1. Complete remission (CR1) from standard cytarabine or HMA-based induction therapy per standard clinical criteria (Cheson Criteria)
  2. Have confirmed presence of CD34+CD38-ALDHint population by flow cytometry at the diagnostic LSC assay (LSC0)
  3. Cytarabine-based induction subjects: Are candidates for (as determined by the investigator) and receive consolidation therapy (cytarabine-based chemotherapy or HCT)
Cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • cytarabine, HiDAc, high dose cytarabine
No Intervention: Observational Cohort 1
Enrolled subjects who do not achieve a CR to induction therapy, regardless of diagnostic phenotype. Following completion of induction therapy and remission bone marrow aspirate, if a subject is determined to not have achieved a complete remission to induction therapy, he or she would be included in observational cohort 1.
No Intervention: Observational Cohort 2

Enrolled subjects who achieve a CR to induction therapy but meet one or more of the following criteria:

  • Lack the immunophenotype of interest,
  • Cytarabine based induction subjects: Are not candidates for [as determined by the investigator (e.g. unfit or refusal)] and do not receive consolidation therapy (cytarabine-based chemotherapy or HCT)
  • HMA-based induction subjects: Are not candidates for [as determined by the investigator (e.g. unfit, lack of donor, refusal)] and do not receive HCT

Final investigator determination of fit-ness can occur at any time until the start of consolidation therapy.

HMA-based induction subjects will not receive consolidation cytarabine-based chemotherapy as part of the evaluable cohort if they do not receive HCT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2 Year Relapse Free Survival (RFS)
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparison of 2 year RFS in patient with detectable LSCs in the marrow at the end of consolidation to the 2 year RFS of patients without detectable LSCs. IWG Criteria (Cheson 2003) was utilized to classify relapse, with relapse defined as ≥ 5% blasts in the marrow or peripheral blood, extramedullary disease, or disease presence determined by a physician upon clinical assessment.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Grunwald, M.D., Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe