The Effect of a Self-rehabilitation Program in Addition to Usual Treatment for Spasticity on Impairment and Activity Limitation in Patients With Spastic Hemiparesis Following Stroke (ADJU-TOX)

March 25, 2020 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of a Self-rehabilitation Program in Addition to Usual Treatment for Spasticity (Repeated Botulinum Toxin Injections and Physiotherapy) on Impairment and Activity Limitation in Patients With Spastic Hemiparesis Following Stroke

The addition of a self-rehabilitation program to repeated Botulinum Toxin Injections (BTI) and usual physiotherapy should increase the proportion of patients who attain their Primary Treatment Goal (impairments and function) more than usual care (involving repeated Botulinum Toxin Injections and conventional physiotherapy), in post stroke out-patients with spasticity.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke affects 150 000 persons in France each year. Most patients have activity limitations because of the resulting motor deficit and spasticity. Autonomy in activities of daily living is reduced.

The principal treatment for focal spasticity is currently intramuscular botulinum toxin injection (BTI).

BTI is classically combined with only 2 to 3 sessions of out-patient physiotherapy per week. This is mainly because of a lack of out-patient therapists. However, this amount of therapy is insufficient and does not follow current literature which shows that the intensity of physiotherapy affects the recovery of impairment and activity. This gap in our health system could be filled by a self-rehabilitation program in addition to physiotherapy.

Recent studies have shown that self-rehabilitation following BTI could significantly improve activity limitation (Roche et al, 2014 ; Sun et al 2010).

The addition of a self-rehabilitation program to BTI and usual out-patient physiotherapy could thus increase the effects of BTI on impairment and activity limitation in patients with spastic hemiparesis following stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

220

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females aged between 18 to 75 years.
  2. Adult patient under guardianship with consent obtained and the legal guardian's authorisation obtained.
  3. Single stroke having occurred more than 6 months before (previous TIA is accepted).
  4. Capable of understanding instructions and participating in the definition of a therapeutic goal (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) < 3).
  5. Having previously undergone BTI. The last injection must have been performed at least 4 months prior to inclusion.
  6. Affiliation to the French social security regime or a similar regime.
  7. Patient (or the legal guardian if under guardian adult patient) has signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are unwilling to participate in the study. For the one under guardianship, the refusal of the patient will be the final decision even if the guardian is willing to participate.
  2. Subjects who are unlikely to adhere to the study an/or poor adherence anticipated by the investigator.
  3. Un-controlled progressive pathology.
  4. Osteoarticular lesion which contraindicates part of the rehabilitation involved in the study.
  5. Patients with other interventions planned prior to the end of the study period (orthosis, surgery etc.).
  6. Surgery to the treated limb less than 6 months previously.
  7. Pregnant woman.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Self-rehabilitation program
Self-rehabilitation program + standard medical care (BTI + conventional physiotherapy)
The self-rehabilitation program will be based on muscle stretching, strengthening and task oriented exercises. For each patient, two exercises will be selected by the therapist for each of these 3 domains (total of 6 exercises) from a list of 50 exercises.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control arm
Arm with standard medical care ( BTI + conventional physiotherapy) without self-rehabilitation program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS).
Time Frame: 6 months
The percentage of patients who attain their Primary Treatment Goal determined using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at each visits and in both groups.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Assessment of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Assessment of Hemispatial neglect
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Assessment of slight deficits according MOCA scale (Montréal Cognitive Assessment)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe