Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as Bridge-to-Candidacy for Obese Left-Ventricular Assist Device Patients (LSG-BTC-LVAD)

December 29, 2016 updated by: Philipp Angleitner
In LVAD (Left-Ventricular Assist Device) patients, evidence is lacking regarding the safety and efficacy of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) as a means to reach a Body Mass Index (BMI) within listing criteria for heart transplantation. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to evaluate laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in LVAD patients as bridge-to-candidacy for heart transplantation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Continuous-flow left-ventricular assist devices are increasingly used for the treatment of acute or chronic end-stage heart failure (Mancini 2015). Three main implantation strategies exist: destination therapy (support until end of life), bridge to transplantation (support until transplantation), and bridge to candidacy (support until transplantation criteria are met). Although LVAD support delivers excellent short-term and long-term results, the current gold standard and last resort of treatment for end-stage heart failure remains orthotopic heart transplantation (Lund 2015).

Obesity increases mortality in heart transplantat recipients and therefore is included in the 2006 transplantation criteria. The heart transplant program of the Medical University of Vienna uses a BMI of 30 kg/m2 as the upper limit to be listed for heart transplantation (Mehra 2016).

Ambulatory patients on CF-LVAD support have a tendency to gain weight because of reduced physical fitness, inability to work, and genetic predisposition. In many cases, binge eating is used as a coping mechanism to alleviate depression and anxiety associated with heart failure and LVAD therapy.

Conservative measures to reduce weight and increase physical fitness fail in many patients. As a result, in many cases these patients remain ineligible for heart transplantation for months or years. For the entire period of ineligibility, they are subject to the constant life-threatening risks of LVAD treatment, most importantly ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, pump thrombosis, infection, right heart failure, and bleeding episodes in the gastrointestinal tract or other organ systems (Kirklin 2015).

Bariatric surgery has been shown to be superior to conservative measures of weight reduction in morbidly obese patients. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, one of the most commonly employed bariatric procedures, reduces body weight by a non-malabsorptive mechanism (Colquitt 2014). Gastric volume reduction is achieved by resection along the stomach's greater curvature and creation of a gastric tube, leading to reduced capacity for ingested food, decreased appetite and earlier satiety. In contrast to malabsorptive bariatric procedures, resorption and efficacy of immunosuppressive drugs, an inevitable feature of post-transplant therapy, are only minimally influenced following sleeve gastrectomy. Furthermore, there is less requirement for substitution of trace elements and vitamins, for example Vitamin B12. Due to the fact that the majority of obese LVAD patients are within a BMI range of 30 to 40 kg/m2, the moderate weight loss achieved by sleeve gastrectomy is expected to be sufficient for reaching the eligibility criterion for heart transplantation.

It is unclear, whether laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is effective and safe in patients on CF-LVAD. The literature is limited to case reports and retrospective series of up to 4 patients. This is the first prospective series including more than 4 patients with the specific aim to enable obese LVAD supported patients to reach a BMI within listing criteria for heart transplantation by the means of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory patients on LVAD-support for end-stage heart failure
  • Bridge-to-Candidacy strategy
  • BMI > 35kg/m2
  • Failure to reach BMI < 30kg/m2 with conservative measures
  • Age > 18 years
  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Absolute contraindications to subsequent heart transplantation other than obesity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BMI (Body-Mass-Index)
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patient weight is measured and BMI is calculated at the time of LSG and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG. The rate of patients with successful weight reduction to a BMI lower than 30kg/m2 is calculated.
12 months post-LSG

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patients' NYHA Class (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IV) is assessed pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG and changes are noted.
12 months post-LSG
6-min Walking Test
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patients are performing the 6-min walking test pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG and changes of the distance walked (m) are assessed.
12 months post-LSG
EQ-5D (EuroQol five dimensions) questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patients are undertaking the EQ-5D quality-of-life questionnaire (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and visual analog scale) pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG to assess changes in the post-operative quality of life.
12 months post-LSG
Work Ability questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patients are undertaking the Work Ability questionnaire including questions about their current or former occupation pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG to assess changes in occupational issues.
12 months post-LSG
WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality of Life) questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patients are undertaking the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire including questions regarding their quality of life pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG to assess changes regarding social, emotional, and health-related issues.
12 months post-LSG
LVEF (Left-Ventricular Ejection Fraction)
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
LVEF (%) is going to be measured by echocardiography pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG to investigate changes of cardiac function.
12 months post-LSG
VO2 max (maximum rate of oxygen consumption)
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Patients are undergoing spiroergometry pre-operatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG to investigate changes of cardiac performance.
12 months post-LSG
Severe adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months post-LSG
Adverse and severe adverse events including death, unplanned hospital readmission, reoperation, major bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia, pericardial fluid collection, device malfunction, hemolysis, hepatic dysfunction, hypertension, major infection, myocardial infarction, neurological dysfunction, psychiatric episodes, renal dysfunction, respiratory failure, right heart failure, arterial non-CNS (central nervous system) thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, wound dehiscence, gastroesophageal reflux disease, vomiting, gastric anastomotic leak, trocar site infection, trocar site hernia, gastric pouch dilation, and others are assessed in the immediately post-operative phase and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LSG.
12 months post-LSG

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Zimpfer, Priv.-Doz. Dr., Medical University of Vienna

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LSG-BTC-LVAD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

3
Subscribe