- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06211699
Effect of Clips Versus Omentopexy on Postoperative Bleeding
The Effect of Omentopexy and Clips on the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Early Postoperative Outcomes: A Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University of Health Science Umraniye Training and Research hospital between July 2023 and November 2023. The Patients who underwent LSG, were between the ages of 18 and 65, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 or BMI ≥ 35 with at least one obesity-related comorbidity were included in the study. Patients who underwent other bariatric surgery procedures, had uncontrolled hypertension, and had preoperative history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were excluded. Approval for the study was received from the ethics committee of tertiary health institution (21.06.2023/218494864). Before the surgery, each of the participants were received comprehensive information about the study, the techniques to be applied were explained, they would be randomly assigned in one of the two groups and the consent form obtained in this context.
Study Groups In the study, patients were divided into two groups: Patients who underwent consecutive clippping along the staple line of the remnant stomach during LSG (clips group) and patients who underwent continuous through-and-through omentopexy of the omentum to the remnant stomach staple line after resection during LSG (omentopexy group).
Data Collection Age, gender, comorbidities, smoking history, preoperative height-weight-BMI values, preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP)-diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values, preoperative hemoglobin-hematocrit values, peroperative SBP-DBP-mean blood pressure (MBP), duration of surgery, postoperative 6th hour and time of discharge hemoglobin-hematocrit values, number of patients transfused erythrocyte suspension (ES) or requiring invasive intervention due to bleeding, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the first postoperative month, and early postoperative complications were recorded. Duration of surgery was determined from the first skin incision to the last skin suture.
Preoperative, peroperative and Postoperative Evaluation Preoperative anesthesia, cardiology and pulmonology evaluations were performed for each patient. Hepatobiliary ultrasound and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy evaluation were performed. Each patient was administered low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 6000 units 1x1 subcutaneously) 12 hours before surgery and was taken to surgery with antiembolism stockings. Intermittant pneumatic compressor device was used perioperatively. Omentopexy was performed with 3-0 V-loc suture (26 mm, V-20 Tapper) and clippping was performed with endo clips II (10 mm, medium/large). Since ERAS protocol was applied in our clinic, no drain was placed in any patient.
At the 4th postoperative hour, all patients were mobilized, intensive respiratory exercise was performed and clear liquid food was started. Complete blood count and C-reactive protein (CRP) laboratory parameters were checked at postoperative 6th, 24th and 48th hour (discharge). Vital parameters were checked every 6 hours postoperatively. Patients who have an acute decrease in hemoglobin value together with a pulse rate of 100 or more per minute and systolic/diastolic blood pressure values below 90/60 mmHg were considered as bleeding and erythrocyte suspension was transfused. Early on the second postoperative day, the patient who could tolerate oral food and did not require additional intervention was discharged.
The primary outcome of the study was to compare the two methods in terms of early postoperative bleeding. The seconder outcome of the study is to compare the groups in terms of duration of surgery, lengh of hospital stay and hospital readmission in the first 30-days postoperatively.
Randomization Patients were numbered according to the order of enrollment and randomly assigned 1:1 to the clips group or the omentopexy group. Allocations were generated using randomly permuted blocks (available at www.randomization.com). All randomization was done by an individual who wasn't included in the study, and the allocations were preserved in sealed envelopes. A research assistant opened the sealed envelope at the beginning of surgery, disclosing the patient's allocation group to the surgeon. The primary surgeon is naturally not blinded to the patient groups and the other surgeon who records and evaluates the data is blinded to the patient groups. All operations were performed laparoscopically by the same surgeon. Since this was a pilot study, no sample size was calculated.
Comparison of Groups The groups were compared in terms of postoperative decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, preoperative and peroperative blood pressure values, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the first 30-days postoperatively, early postoperative complications and number of patients requiring ES transfusion.
Statical Analaysis A meticulous statistical evaluation was performed on the collected baseline clinical data to ensure robust and reliable conclusions. For continuous variables, the analysis employed both t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on the distribution characteristics of the data. Categorical variables, on the other hand, were rigorously examined using either Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test, based on the appropriateness for the dataset at hand.
This analytical process was facilitated by the use of SPSS software, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), which is renowned for its precision and versatility in handling diverse statistical tasks. Care was taken to conduct all tests as two-tailed, providing a comprehensive view of the data. The threshold for statistical significance was set at a p value of less than 0.05, aligning with standard practices in clinical research.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Umraniye
-
Istanbul, Umraniye, Turkey, 34764
- Umraniye Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The Patients who underwent LSG
- Between the ages of 18 and 65,
- A Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 or BMI ≥ 35 with at least one obesity-related comorbidity
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent other bariatric surgery procedures,
- Patients who declined to be participate
- uncontrolled hypertension
- preoperative history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Patients who underwent continuous through-and-through omentopexy of the omentum to the remnant stomach staple line after resection during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (omentopexy group).
|
Patients with omentum sewed to the remnant gastric staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
|
Active Comparator: Clips with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Patients who underwent consecutive clippping along the staple line of the remnant stomach during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (clips group)
|
Patients performed clips to the remnant gastric staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Postoperative Bleeding
Time Frame: up to 3 Months
|
The primary outcome of the study was to compare the two methods in terms of early postoperative bleeding.
This comparison will be made with hemoglobin and hematocrit values measured at postoperative 6th hour, 24th hour and at discharge.
The groups will be compared according to the decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, whether ES displacement is required, and whether intervention is required.
|
up to 3 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Postoperative First Month Readmission
Time Frame: 30-days postoperatively
|
The seconder outcome of the study is to compare the groups in terms of hospital readmission in the first 30-days postoperatively.
Patients readmitted to the hospital in the first postoperative month will be recorded and reasons for readmission will be categorized and groups will be compared.
|
30-days postoperatively
|
The duration of surgery (minutes)
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
The seconder outcome of the study is to compare the groups in terms of duration of surgery (minutes) Surgical time will be calculated based on the time between the first port incision and the last skin suture.
|
Intraoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Muhammed Taha Demirpolat, M.D., Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 218494864
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications
-
Marmara UniversityHacettepe University; Cukurova University; Gazi University; Baskent University; Istanbul... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingComplications, PostoperativeTurkey
-
Syed HusainRecruitingComplications, PostoperativeUnited States
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionRecruitingSurgery | Lung Infection | Complications, PostoperativeSweden
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedSurgery | Surgery--Complications | Perioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCompletedLiver Transplant; Complications | Perioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesTerminatedPerioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsUnited States
-
Technical University of MunichHealth Information Management, BelgiumActive, not recruitingPerioperative/Postoperative Complications
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...CompletedPerioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsTurkey
-
Namigar TurgutCompletedPerioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsTurkey
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedPerioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsTurkey
Clinical Trials on Omentopexy with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
-
Centre Hospitalier Departemental VendeeRecruiting
-
Sengkang General HospitalSingapore General HospitalRecruitingObesity | Gastroesophageal Reflux | Bariatric Surgery Candidate | Esophagus InjurySingapore
-
University of FoggiaCompletedBleeding | Obesity, Morbid | Bariatric Surgery Candidate | Leak, AnastomoticItaly
-
GEM Hospital & Research CenterUnknown
-
King Saud UniversityNew You Medical CenterCompleted
-
Zagazig UniversityUnknown
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityElazig Special Eastern Anatolian HospitalCompletedMorbid Obesity | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy | Post Operative ComplicaitonTurkey
-
Shanghai 10th People's HospitalCompletedPolycystic Ovary Syndrome
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompleted