Evaluation of a Novel Technique to Investigate CAS Piezo Electric Sensors

November 3, 2021 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University
The proposed study is evaluating a novel technology, Carotid Stenotic Scan (CSS), developed by the sponsor, CVR Global. Study Design. This is a prospective cohort study that will compare a new application of a technology, the CSS device, to reference standards for assessment of carotid disease.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overall objectives of this study are to demonstrate that the Carotid Stenotic Scan (CSS) can accurately detect significant carotid artery stenosis.

Secondary objective is to relate changes in CSS signal to different degrees of stenosis. We obtain a "proof of concept" if the device correlates strongly with the established classification of atherosclerotic carotid disease derived various imaging modalities including magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computer tomographic angiography (CTA), conventional angiography, or carotid ultrasound.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

414

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of patients presenting to a Jefferson facility for carotid imaging studies. Subjects scheduled for carotid artery assessments will be identified prior to the day of study using radiology scheduling.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects over 18 referred for carotid duplex ultrasound.
  • Subjects over 18 referred for CT angiography, MR angiography, or conventional angiography of the carotid arteries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stent
  • Previous surgery involving the neck (including thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy)
  • Patients with prosthetic heart valve
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between percent carotid artery stenosis measured by CSS and by carotid ultrasound
Time Frame: CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid ultrasound
CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid ultrasound

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between percent carotid artery stenosis measured by CSS and by carotid CTA
Time Frame: CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid CTA
CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid CTA
Difference between percent carotid artery stenosis measured by CSS and by carotid MRA
Time Frame: CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid MRA
CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid MRA
Difference between percent carotid artery stenosis measured by CSS and carotid angiogram
Time Frame: CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid angiogram
CSS reported percentage of carotid stenosis within 30 days of carotid angiogram

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David J Whellan, MD MHS, Thomas Jefferson University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe