Robot-assisted IVOR-LEWIS Esophagectomy (RAILE)

January 3, 2022 updated by: Hecheng Li M.D., Ph.D, Ruijin Hospital

Robot- Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Short- Term and Long Term Outcomes of a Single-Arm Phase II Trial

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) have become increasingly popular in esophageal cancer. It is generally accepted that comparing to open resections, MIE results in decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery times, and shorter hospital stays with comparable oncologic outcomes. However, MIE poses an important challenge for established thoracic surgeons as it is a difficult technique to become skilled at with an protracted learning curve. Standard laparoscopic and thoracoscopic instruments are rigid and provide a finite freedom of movement with a two dimensional visualization of the operating field. Such a difficulty is increased even more when the Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis is needed.

Robot- assisted surgical system has opened a new era of minimally invasive surgery. Robot- assisted surgery offers some advantages including high- definition three- dimensional visualization and 7 degrees of freedom with the use of its surgical wrists, motion scaling, and tremor filtration, allowing the surgeon to perform complex operations comfortably in the domain of urinary tract, hepatobiliary and gynecological surgery. Although a robot-assisted thoraco- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was initiated from 2003, the published experience with RAMIE remains small, especially for Ivor- Lewis approaches. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- term and long-term outcomes of RAILE to identify any clinical or oncologic benefits of RAILE in esophageal cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This confirmatory, nonrandomized, single-arm trial (phase II) will be conducted to evaluate short-and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted thoraco- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Patients will registered preoperatively. The planned sample size was 51. Preoperative endoscopic biopsy was performed in all patients to confirm the histological diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Staging workup included thorough history and physical examination, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. Patients with histologically proven malignancy were candidates for surgical procedures. Operability criteria were defined according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III. In general, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease. The primary endpoint in the first stage is the short-term postoperative complications, and that in the second stage is overall survival; patients continue to be followed up for this endpoint.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Yajie Zhang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with histologically proven malignancy were candidates for surgical procedures. Operability criteria were defined according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III. In general, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with histologically proven esophageal malignancy
  2. All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III
  3. neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease

Exclusion Criteria:

Cancer located at the cervical esophageal Cancer located at the gastroesophageal junction history of surgery in the right thorax

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
rate of major postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
rate of overall postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery
rate of 30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery
operative time
Time Frame: during the operation
during the operation
rate of conversion
Time Frame: during the operation
during the operation
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery
within 30 days after surgery
rate of R0 resection
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery
within 30 days after surgery
number of harvested lymph nodes
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery
within 30 days after surgery
overall survival
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
3 years after surgery
disease-free survival
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
3 years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe