App Reminder on ASA Adherence

October 21, 2019 updated by: Deborah Wittig-Wells, RN, PhD, Emory University

Impact of a Smartphone App Reminder on Adherence Aspirin Prescribed as Anti-Thrombotic Therapy

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of using a smartphone app reminder on medication adherence twice daily in adults prescribed 81 milligrams of aspirin for 35 days as anti-thrombotic therapy after knee or hip arthroplasty.

This study will randomly assign participants to get usual postoperative care which is teaching with verbal instructions and printed information about taking the aspirin at the time of discharge, or to have an app on your smartphone with preset reminders in addition to usual postoperative discharge teaching after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of using a smartphone application (app) reminder on medication adherence twice daily in 200 adults prescribed 81 milligrams of aspirin (ASA) for 35 days as anti-thrombotic therapy after knee or hip arthroplasty. The aim is to determine if an app downloaded on a smartphone that reminds patients twice a day to take their ASA as prescribed will improve ASA adherence and clinical outcomes for patients after total knee and total hip joint arthroplasty compared to those in the usual care.

This is a two group, randomized control study with random assignment into the control group for usual care or the intervention group to receive a medication reminder app for their smart phone (daily for 35 days) plus usual care. Participants will receive a baseline interview for demographic and other data and 36 day follow-up assessment, both conducted in person.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

195

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30084
        • Emory Orthopedic and Spine Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prescribed aspirin 81 mg twice a day for 35 days
  • Ability to write and speak English
  • Have a smart phone with the capacity to download and set an app
  • Own and use a smart phone for communication purposes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of mental illness
  • Do not own a smart phone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Education
Participants randomized to this arm will receive the standard education provided to patients about the importance of taking aspirin to prevent thromboembolic events after orthopedic surgery.
Participants will receive the usual verbal education and printed information provided to patients about the importance of taking aspirin to prevent thromboembolic events after orthopedic surgery, medication dosage and scheduling.
Experimental: Medication Reminder App + Standard Education
Participants randomized to this arm will use a smartphone app with preset reminders to take aspirin to prevent thromboembolic events after orthopedic surgery in addition to usual postoperative discharge teaching.
Participants will receive the usual verbal education and printed information provided to patients about the importance of taking aspirin to prevent thromboembolic events after orthopedic surgery, medication dosage and scheduling.
Participants will use a medication reminder app that is set in collaboration with the participants for times that fit into their daily lifestyle. The app will alert participants when it is time (selected by the participant) to take their medication.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Pills Taken
Time Frame: Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
The proportion of pills taken is defined as the percentage of pills taken by study participants.
Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Adherence Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
The ACTG Adherence Questionnaire consists of 19 items measuring different aspects of efficacy (or confidence) in the management of one's medication. Each item is rated from 0 ("I cannot do at all") to 10 ("Sure I can do"), with total scores found by summing responses to individual items and dividing by 19. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of medication self-efficacy.
Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
Aspirin (ASA) Self-Efficacy Scale Score
Time Frame: Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
The ASA Self-Efficacy Scale consists of 19 items measuring different aspects of efficacy (or confidence) in the management of one's medication. Each item is rated from 0 ("I cannot do at all") to 10 ("Sure I can do"), with total scores found by summing responses to individual items and dividing by 19. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of medication self-efficacy.
Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
Number of Thromboembolic Events
Time Frame: Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
Clinical outcomes will be assessed at follow-up by self-report questions to ascertain if any thromboembolic events occurred.
Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
Aspirin (ASA) General Adherence Scale Score
Time Frame: Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
The ASA General Adherence Scale measures the ease and ability to adhere to the ASA regimen as prescribed. It is scored by summing responses to the individual items and creating a total score. Higher scores indicate better self-reported adherence.
Post- Operative Visit (Day 36)
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) Survey Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
The UTAUT2 measures antecedents (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, hedonic motivation) and behavioral intent to use mobile apps. Items are scored using a 7-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Survey totals range between 14 and 112. Higher scores are indicative of greater acceptance and intent to adopt the target technology.
Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Performance Expectancy Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
The Performance Expectancy Subscale measures the perceived benefits of mobile app technology to the consumer. Scores range from 4 to 28, with higher totals indicating better perceptions of technology-related benefits.
Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Effort Expectancy Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
The Effort Expectancy Subscale measures the ease with which the consumer can learn and operate an app. Scores range from 4 to 28, with higher totals indicating greater beliefs that the technology is easy and accessible.
Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Hedonic Motivation Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
The Hedonic Motivation subscale measures the enjoyment, the consumer experiences from using an app. Respondents answer each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Absolutely True) to 7 (Absolutely Untrue). Scoring is kept continuous with higher scores indicating greater enjoyment.
Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Behavioral Intent Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
The Behavioral Intent Subscale measures the decision to use a mobile app. Scores range from 3 to 21, with higher totals indicating a greater intent to use or adopt an app.
Baseline (Pre-Intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deborah Wittig-Wells, PhD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00094970

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thromboembolic Event

Clinical Trials on Standard Education

3
Subscribe